IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v188y2023ics1364032123006974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritisation of biomass-derived products for biorefineries based on economic feasibility: A review on the comparability of techno-economic assessment results

Author

Listed:
  • Louw, Jeanne
  • Dogbe, Eunice S.
  • Yang, Bin
  • Görgens, Johann F.

Abstract

Biorefineries are critical components for industrial conversion of sustainably sourced plant biomass into fuels, chemicals and materials. Cascading of potential products from highest to lowest economic value is required to allocate limited global biomass potentials to preferred products with higher economic feasibility. Therefore, techno-economic assessments (TEAs) of individual products for biorefineries have to be compared to each other. Reported economic feasibilities for individual products from a wide range of TEA studies were reviewed, in the context of 1st and 2nd generation biorefineries, to prioritise the allocation of biomass resources to preferred products. Substantial variabilities exist in methodologies and input assumptions to reported TEA results, which affects the comparativeness of individual products. Key factors affecting the economic feasibility of products include feedstock type, composition and cost, plant location, operational time, production scale and process integration strategies. Despite such variability, current reviewed TEAs indicate that chemical, bioplastic and food products such as adipic acid, 1,4-butanediol, citric acid, ethanol, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid, fructooligosaccharides, glutamic acid, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, (poly)lactic acid, levulinic acid, polybutylene succinate and succinic acid are preferred options for allocation of limited global biomass resources, considering current technology performances and market prices. Improvements to the prioritisation of bioproducts on a global scale will require a standardised approach for biorefinery TEAs, similar to the requirements for comparison of environmental impacts between different products and associated life cycles. Developments in global agreements, policies, and market-related regulations are likely to continue to alter the economic feasibility of different products, in lieu of their perceived environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Louw, Jeanne & Dogbe, Eunice S. & Yang, Bin & Görgens, Johann F., 2023. "Prioritisation of biomass-derived products for biorefineries based on economic feasibility: A review on the comparability of techno-economic assessment results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:188:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123006974
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123006974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunukula, Sampath & Klein, Sharon J.W. & Pendse, Hemant P. & DeSisto, William J. & Wheeler, M. Clayton, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of thermal deoxygenation based biorefineries for the coproduction of fuels and chemicals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 16-23.
    2. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Frazer Musonda & Markus Millinger & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement Potentials and Economics of Selected Biochemicals in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Hernández, Valentina & Romero-García, Juan M. & Dávila, Javier A. & Castro, Eulogio & Cardona, Carlos A., 2014. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of an olive stone based biorefinery," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 145-150.
    5. Tanmay Chaturvedi & Ana I. Torres & George Stephanopoulos & Mette Hedegaard Thomsen & Jens Ejbye Schmidt, 2020. "Developing Process Designs for Biorefineries—Definitions, Categories, and Unit Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Khatiwada, Dilip & Leduc, Sylvain & Silveira, Semida & McCallum, Ian, 2016. "Optimizing ethanol and bioelectricity production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 371-386.
    7. Stafford, W. & De Lange, W. & Nahman, A. & Chunilall, V. & Lekha, P. & Andrew, J. & Johakimu, J. & Sithole, B. & Trotter, D., 2020. "Forestry biorefineries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 461-475.
    8. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2017. "High-value low-volume bioproducts coupled to bioenergies with potential to enhance business development of sustainable biorefineries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 793-804.
    9. Usmani, Zeba & Sharma, Minaxi & Awasthi, Abhishek Kumar & Lukk, Tiit & Tuohy, Maria G. & Gong, Liang & Nguyen-Tri, Phuong & Goddard, Alan D. & Bill, Roslyn M. & Nayak, S.Chandra & Gupta, Vijai Kumar, 2021. "Lignocellulosic biorefineries: The current state of challenges and strategies for efficient commercialization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Therese Bennich & Salim Belyazid, 2017. "The Route to Sustainability—Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Vandenberghe, L.P.S. & Valladares-Diestra, K.K. & Bittencourt, G.A. & Zevallos Torres, L.A. & Vieira, S. & Karp, S.G. & Sydney, E.B. & de Carvalho, J.C. & Thomaz Soccol, V. & Soccol, C.R., 2022. "Beyond sugar and ethanol: The future of sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Machado, R.L. & Abreu, M.R., 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of the first and second-generation ethanol supply chain in Brazil using the water-energy-food-land nexus approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    6. Gilani, H. & Sahebi, H. & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2020. "Sustainable sugarcane-to-bioethanol supply chain network design: A robust possibilistic programming model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Rodrigo Salvador & Reinalda Blanco Pereira & Gabriel Fernandes Sales & Vanessa Campana Vergani Oliveira & Anthony Halog & Antonio C. Francisco, 2022. "Current Panorama, Practice Gaps, and Recommendations to Accelerate the Transition to a Circular Bioeconomy in Latin America and the Caribbean," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    10. d'Amore, Federico & Bezzo, Fabrizio, 2017. "Managing technology performance risk in the strategic design of biomass-based supply chains for energy in the transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 563-574.
    11. Constantine Iliopoulos & Vladislav Valentinov, 2018. "Member Heterogeneity in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Systems-Theoretic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Sadeghi Darvazeh, Saeed & Mansoori Mooseloo, Farzaneh & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Amiri, Maghsoud & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Data-driven robust optimization to design an integrated sustainable forest biomass-to-electricity network under disjunctive uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    13. Iliopoulos, Constantine & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2018. "Member heterogeneity in agricultural cooperatives: A systems-theoretic perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22.
    14. Kim, Kyeongsu & Suh, Young-Woong & Ha, Jeong-Myeong & An, Jinjoo & Lee, Ung, 2023. "A comprehensive analysis of biphasic reaction system for economical biodiesel production process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Baharam Roy & Peter Kleine-Möllhoff & Antoine Dalibard, 2022. "Superheated Steam Torrefaction of Biomass Residues with Valorisation of Platform Chemicals Part—2: Economic Assessment and Commercialisation Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Albarracín E., Eva Susana & Gamboa, Juan C. Rodríguez & Marques, Elaine C.M. & Stosic, Tatijana, 2019. "Complexity analysis of Brazilian agriculture and energy market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 933-941.
    17. Galán-Martín, Ángel & Contreras, María del Mar & Romero, Inmaculada & Ruiz, Encarnación & Bueno-Rodríguez, Salvador & Eliche-Quesada, Dolores & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio, 2022. "The potential role of olive groves to deliver carbon dioxide removal in a carbon-neutral Europe: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    18. Fumi Harahap & Sylvain Leduc & Sennai Mesfun & Dilip Khatiwada & Florian Kraxner & Semida Silveira, 2019. "Opportunities to Optimize the Palm Oil Supply Chain in Sumatra, Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    19. de Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Freire, Fausto, 2016. "Economic-energy-environment analysis of prospective sugarcane bioethanol production in Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 514-526.
    20. Aguirre-Fierro, Arelí & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Cerqueira, Miguel A. & Ramos-González, Rodolfo & Rodríguez-Jasso, Rosa M. & Marques, Susana & Lukasik, Rafal M., 2020. "Sustainable approach of high-pressure agave bagasse pretreatment for ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1347-1354.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:188:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123006974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.