IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v154y2020icp461-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forestry biorefineries

Author

Listed:
  • Stafford, W.
  • De Lange, W.
  • Nahman, A.
  • Chunilall, V.
  • Lekha, P.
  • Andrew, J.
  • Johakimu, J.
  • Sithole, B.
  • Trotter, D.

Abstract

All materials, chemicals and fuels made from fossil fuels can be made from sustainably sourced biomass. Biorefineries are key infrastructure developments needed to unlock the value from biomass and accelerate the transition to a Bioeconomy. The Forestry, Timber, Pulp & Paper industry produces lumber, pulp and paper bulk commodities to market. However, there are notable value-adding opportunities for Forestry biorefineries, since about 50% of the harvested tree biomass ends up as residues and waste. In order to assess the opportunity for Forestry biorefineries, this paper reviewed the various processing pathways, technologies and products that can be produced from wood residues and wastes from the FTPP industry (sawdust & offcuts, bark, leaves, sludge, black liquor, dregs and ash). A total of 129 chemical, thermochemical, biological and mechanical processing pathways were identified to generate 78 different unique products. We assessed the technical maturity of these processing pathways in terms of the technology readiness level and evaluated the market potential of these products to identify and classify Forestry biorefinery products as: true commodities, pseudo-commodities, fine chemicals and speciality chemicals. This study provides strategic focus for the development of Forestry biorefineries by distinguishing between un-established markets and lack of technology or innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stafford, W. & De Lange, W. & Nahman, A. & Chunilall, V. & Lekha, P. & Andrew, J. & Johakimu, J. & Sithole, B. & Trotter, D., 2020. "Forestry biorefineries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 461-475.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:461-475
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120301828
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Nanda, Sonil & Azargohar, Ramin & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2015. "An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 925-941.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Liu, Xu & Guo, Yang & Dasgupta, Anish & He, Haoran & Xu, Donghai & Guan, Qingqing, 2022. "Algal bio-oil refinery: A review of heterogeneously catalyzed denitrogenation and demetallization reactions for renewable process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 627-650.
    4. Louw, Jeanne & Dogbe, Eunice S. & Yang, Bin & Görgens, Johann F., 2023. "Prioritisation of biomass-derived products for biorefineries based on economic feasibility: A review on the comparability of techno-economic assessment results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Xie, Xinyu & Song, Kai & Wang, Jing & Hu, Jinguang & Wu, Shufang & Chu, Qiulu, 2024. "Efficient ethanol production from masson pine sawdust by various organosolv pretreatment and modified pre-hydrolysis simultaneous saccharification and fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    2. Brizga, Janis & Räty, Tarmo, 2024. "Production, consumption and trade-based forest land and resource footprints in the Nordic and Baltic countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Erika Palmer & Robert Burton & Cecilia Haskins, 2020. "A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Faubert, Patrick & Barnabé, Simon & Bouchard, Sylvie & Côté, Richard & Villeneuve, Claude, 2016. "Pulp and paper mill sludge management practices: What are the challenges to assess the impacts on greenhouse gas emissions?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-133.
    5. Proestou, Maria & Schulz, Nicolai & Feindt, Peter, 2023. "Resilience Orientation in National Bioeconomy Policies: A Global Comparative Analysis," SocArXiv 5xzwf, Center for Open Science.
    6. Sven Wydra, 2019. "Value Chains for Industrial Biotechnology in the Bioeconomy-Innovation System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Amit Kumar Basukala & Martin Bruckner & Jan Börner, 2018. "Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Xie, Wei & Ren, Yanjing & Jiang, Fan & Liang, Jibao & Du, Shuang-kui, 2020. "Pretreatment of quinoa straw with 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride and physiochemical characterization of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1364-1371.
    9. George B. Frisvold & Steven M. Moss & Andrea Hodgson & Mary E. Maxon, 2021. "Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Xuezhou Wen & Daniel Quacoe & Dinah Quacoe & Kingsley Appiah & Bertha Ada Danso, 2019. "Analysis on Bioeconomy’s Contribution to GDP: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Jarre, Matteo & Petit-Boix, Anna & Priefer, Carmen & Meyer, Rolf & Leipold, Sina, 2020. "Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy - What can we learn from wood cascading?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Julio Berbel & Alejandro Posadillo, 2018. "Review and Analysis of Alternatives for the Valorisation of Agro-Industrial Olive Oil By-Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, January.
    14. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    15. Lühmann, Malte & Vogelpohl, Thomas, 2023. "The bioeconomy in Germany: A failing political project?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Nora Szarka & Laura García Laverde & Daniela Thrän & Orest Kiyko & Mykhailo Ilkiv & Danka Moravčíková & Eva Cudlínová & Miloslav Lapka & Nóra Hatvani & Ákos Koós & Aleksandra Luks & Ignacio Martín Jim, 2023. "Stakeholder Engagement in the Co-Design of Regional Bioeconomy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-37, April.
    17. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Biogas from Agri-Food and Agricultural Waste Can Appreciate Agro-Ecosystem Services: The Case Study of Emilia Romagna Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Chimphango, Annie, 2021. "Assessing the potential of integrating cassava residues-based bioenergy into national energy mix using long-range Energy Alternatives Planning systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Manuel Hafner & Lukas Fehr & Jan Springorum & Artur Petkau & Reinhard Johler, 2020. "Perceptions of Bioeconomy and the Desire for Governmental Action: Regional Actors’ Connotations of Wood-Based Bioeconomy in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:461-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.