IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v187y2023ics1364032123005956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated application of morphological, anatomical, biochemical and physico-chemical methods to identify superior, lignocellulosic grass feedstocks for bioenergy purposes

Author

Listed:
  • Rahaman, Touhidur
  • Biswas, Subhadeep
  • Ghorai, Shubhankar
  • Bera, Sudeshna
  • Dey, Sonali
  • Guha, Suman
  • Maity, Debabrata
  • De, Sukanta
  • Ganguly, Jhuma
  • Das, Malay

Abstract

Grasses have sufficient potential to be used in the biofuel industry due to many reasons. Hence, systematic assessments of the lignocellulosic biomass obtained from six grasses namely Arundo donax, Chrysopogon zizanioides, Coix lacryma-jobi, Pennisetum purpureum, Saccharum spontaneum, and Sorghum bicolor have been performed to assess their potential for bioethanol production. Selected morphological (height, internode diameter, number of internodes, fresh biomass, dry biomass, total volatile matter), anatomical (vascular bundle, stain intensity), analytical (crystallinity index of cellulose, thermal stability, hemicellulose, moisture content) and biochemical (α-cellulose, acid insoluble lignin) parameters were investigated and statistically analysed to detect the superior grass species. The study indicates that S. spontaneum harbours promising biofuel potential by having high dry biomass (56.33 g), α-cellulose (55.88–67.76%), but lower thermal stability (Tmax: 344.37 °C). Comparable ligno-cellulose properties with respect to dry biomass (54.60 g), α-cellulose content (45.95–64.14%), Tmax (360.51 °C) have been observed for A. donax. However, relatively higher lignin contents (∼17–23%) and crystalline cellulose (43.63%–46.96%) in S. spontaneum and A. donax might have resulted into lesser saccharification yield (216.04–230.08 mg/g). On that aspect, S. bicolor and C. lacryma-jobi might be useful since they possessed lower lignin (14.03–16.56%) and crystalline cellulose (32.51–33.02%) leading to higher glucose yield (263–420.06 mg/g). Taken together, this study indicates that integration of morphological, biochemical, and analytical properties of biomasses are complex, yet useful to predict a ‘superior donor plant’ for bioenergy purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahaman, Touhidur & Biswas, Subhadeep & Ghorai, Shubhankar & Bera, Sudeshna & Dey, Sonali & Guha, Suman & Maity, Debabrata & De, Sukanta & Ganguly, Jhuma & Das, Malay, 2023. "Integrated application of morphological, anatomical, biochemical and physico-chemical methods to identify superior, lignocellulosic grass feedstocks for bioenergy purposes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123005956
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123005956
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaurav, N. & Sivasankari, S. & Kiran, GS & Ninawe, A. & Selvin, J., 2017. "Utilization of bioresources for sustainable biofuels: A Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 205-214.
    2. Ullah, Kifayat & Kumar Sharma, Vinod & Dhingra, Sunil & Braccio, Giacobbe & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Sofia, Sofia, 2015. "Assessing the lignocellulosic biomass resources potential in developing countries: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 682-698.
    3. Isah Y. Mohammed & Yousif A. Abakr & Feroz K. Kazi & Suzana Yusup & Ibraheem Alshareef & Soh A. Chin, 2015. "Comprehensive Characterization of Napier Grass as a Feedstock for Thermochemical Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Ahmad Dar, Rouf & Ahmad Dar, Eajaz & Kaur, Ajit & Gupta Phutela, Urmila, 2018. "Sweet sorghum-a promising alternative feedstock for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4070-4090.
    5. Qureshi, Fazil & Yusuf, Mohammad & Kamyab, Hesam & Vo, Dai-Viet N. & Chelliapan, Shreeshivadasan & Joo, Sang-Woo & Vasseghian, Yasser, 2022. "Latest eco-friendly avenues on hydrogen production towards a circular bioeconomy: Currents challenges, innovative insights, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Mohapatra, Sonali & Mishra, Chinmaya & Behera, Sudhansu S. & Thatoi, Hrudayanath, 2017. "Application of pretreatment, fermentation and molecular techniques for enhancing bioethanol production from grass biomass – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1007-1032.
    7. Bogusława Waliszewska & Mieczysław Grzelak & Eliza Gaweł & Agnieszka Spek-Dźwigała & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Wojciech Czekała, 2021. "Chemical Characteristics of Selected Grass Species from Polish Meadows and Their Potential Utilization for Energy Generation Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Zhang, Ke & Johnson, Loretta & Prasad, P.V. Vara & Pei, Zhijian & Yuan, Wenqiao & Wang, Donghai, 2015. "Comparison of big bluestem with other native grasses: Chemical composition and biofuel yield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 358-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łukasz Sobol & Karol Wolski & Adam Radkowski & Elżbieta Piwowarczyk & Maciej Jurkowski & Henryk Bujak & Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2022. "Determination of Energy Parameters and Their Variability between Varieties of Fodder and Turf Grasses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Piotr Banaszuk, 2021. "Specific Methane Yield of Wetland Biomass in Dry and Wet Fermentation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Raud, M. & Kikas, T. & Sippula, O. & Shurpali, N.J., 2019. "Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 44-56.
    4. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    5. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Pan, Junting & Peng, Wanxi & Wang, Yajing & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "The potential of aquatic weed as a resource for sustainable bioenergy sources and bioproducts production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    6. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    7. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Romero-García, Juan Miguel & Martínez-Patiño, Juan Carlos & Ruiz-Ramos, Encarnación & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio & Cardona-Alzate, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Acid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for energy vectors production: A review focused on operational conditions and techno-economic assessment for bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 587-601.
    8. Sergio Paniagua & Alba Prado-Guerra & Ana Isabel Neto & Teresa Nunes & Luís Tarelho & Célia Alves & Luis Fernando Calvo, 2020. "Influence of Varieties and Organic Fertilizer in the Elaboration of a New Poplar-Straw Pellet and Its Emissions in a Domestic Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Dastan Bamwesigye & Petr Kupec & Georges Chekuimo & Jindrich Pavlis & Obed Asamoah & Samuel Antwi Darkwah & Petra Hlaváčková, 2020. "Charcoal and Wood Biomass Utilization in Uganda: The Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    11. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Chen, Dengyu & Cen, Kehui & Cao, Xiaobing & Chen, Fan & Zhang, Jie & Zhou, Jianbin, 2021. "Insight into a new phenolic-leaching pretreatment on bamboo pyrolysis: Release characteristics of pyrolytic volatiles, upgradation of three phase products, migration of elements, and energy yield," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Severo, Ihana Aguiar & Siqueira, Stefania Fortes & Deprá, Mariany Costa & Maroneze, Mariana Manzoni & Zepka, Leila Queiroz & Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo, 2019. "Biodiesel facilities: What can we address to make biorefineries commercially competitive?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 686-705.
    14. Morenike Ajike Peters & Carine Tondo Alves & Jude Azubuike Onwudili, 2023. "A Review of Current and Emerging Production Technologies for Biomass-Derived Sustainable Aviation Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-40, August.
    15. Đặng, Tấn-Hiệp & Nguyễn, Xuân-Hoàn & Chou, Chi-Lin & Chen, Bing-Hung, 2021. "Preparation of cancrinite-type zeolite from diatomaceous earth as transesterification catalysts for biodiesel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 347-358.
    16. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Yang, Chunlei & Dong, Lifeng & Gao, Yanhua & Jia, Peng & Diao, Qiyu, 2021. "Engineering acetogens for biofuel production: From cellular biology to process improvement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    18. De Corato, Ugo & De Bari, Isabella & Viola, Egidio & Pugliese, Massimo, 2018. "Assessing the main opportunities of integrated biorefining from agro-bioenergy co/by-products and agroindustrial residues into high-value added products associated to some emerging markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 326-346.
    19. Qatan, Hesham Sadeq Obaid & Wan Ab Karim Ghani, Wan Azlina & Md Said, Mohamad Syazarudin, 2023. "Prediction and optimization of syngas production from Napier grass air gasification via kinetic modelling and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    20. Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Agata Borowik & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2023. "Calorific Value of Zea mays Biomass Derived from Soil Contaminated with Chromium (VI) Disrupting the Soil’s Biochemical Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123005956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.