IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v103y2019icp399-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of water stress on renewable energy from sugarcane biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Coelho, Rubens Duarte
  • Lizcano, Jonathan Vásquez
  • da Silva Barros, Timóteo Herculino
  • da Silva Barbosa, Fernando
  • Leal, Daniel Philipe Veloso
  • da Costa Santos, Lucas
  • Ribeiro, Nathalia Lopes
  • Júnior, Eusímio Felisbino Fraga
  • Martin, Derrel L.

Abstract

The higher heating value (HHV) of sugarcane biomass components has been well documented; however, the effect of different soil water levels (abiotic stress) during the growing season on HHV has not been assessed for this energy crop. Drip irrigation in sugarcane production presents a potential to be a disruptive technology for sugarcane mills in terms of water-energy-nexus, making this inextricable relationship more efficient. The objective of this article was to quantify the higher heating value and useful energy from biomass partitions of different sugarcane varieties (Saccharum spp.) drip irrigated at four water levels and four maturation processes (drying off intensity prior to harvesting time); this information is not available in literature to date. The contribution of this article to the state of the art of knowledge are: a) the heating values for sugarcane partitions: bagasse, leaves and pointers did not vary significantly for varieties, water stress levels under drip irrigation and maturation processes; conversely, the heating value for the sheath biomass partition vary significantly for varieties. The average heating values for all treatments for the bagasse, sheaths, leaves and pointers were 18.16, 17.21, 17.64 and 17.84 MJ kg−1 respectively; b) the useful energy in sugarcane is almost totally dependent on the biomass produced per unit of area; drip irrigation levels and sugarcane variety traits are important in establishing the bioenergy productivity per area; the average value obtained for all treatments was 660.29 GJ ha−1 year−1 (36.90 Mg dry mass ha−1 year−1). Drip irrigated sugarcane crops at higher water levels in the soil, resulted a higher intensive land use and less deforestation pressure at sugarcane bioenergy production areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Coelho, Rubens Duarte & Lizcano, Jonathan Vásquez & da Silva Barros, Timóteo Herculino & da Silva Barbosa, Fernando & Leal, Daniel Philipe Veloso & da Costa Santos, Lucas & Ribeiro, Nathalia Lopes & J, 2019. "Effect of water stress on renewable energy from sugarcane biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 399-407.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:399-407
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118308207
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. García, Carlos A. & Manzini, Fabio & Islas, Jorge M., 2017. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol production from two crops in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1199-1207.
    2. Cai, Junmeng & He, Yifeng & Yu, Xi & Banks, Scott W. & Yang, Yang & Zhang, Xingguang & Yu, Yang & Liu, Ronghou & Bridgwater, Anthony V., 2017. "Review of physicochemical properties and analytical characterization of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 309-322.
    3. Botha, Tyron & von Blottnitz, Harro, 2006. "A comparison of the environmental benefits of bagasse-derived electricity and fuel ethanol on a life-cycle basis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2654-2661, November.
    4. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2010. "Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1419-1427, June.
    5. Shareef, Muhammad & Gui, Dongwei & Zeng, Fanjiang & Waqas, Muhammad & Zhang, Bo & Iqbal, Hassan, 2018. "Water productivity, growth, and physiological assessment of deficit irrigated cotton on hyperarid desert-oases in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Alamilla-Magaña, J.C. & Carrillo-Ávila, E. & Obrador-Olán, J.J. & Landeros-Sánchez, C. & Vera-Lopez, J. & Juárez-López, J.F., 2016. "Soil moisture tension effect on sugar cane growth and yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 264-273.
    7. Nogueira Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo & Perrella Balestieri, José Antônio, 2015. "Exploring the water-energy nexus in Brazil: The electricity use for water supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 415-432.
    8. Lopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido & Delai, Ivete & Delgado Montes, Mary Laura & Roberto Ometto, Aldo, 2014. "Life cycle assessment of the sugarcane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 532-547.
    9. Li, Xiaojie & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Xiaotao & Li, Fusheng & Lu, Hongna, 2018. "Deficit irrigation provokes more pronounced responses of maize photosynthesis and water productivity to elevated CO2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 71-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yahui & Li, Sien & Qin, Shujing & Guo, Hui & Yang, Danni & Lam, Hon-Ming, 2020. "How can drip irrigation save water and reduce evapotranspiration compared to border irrigation in arid regions in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. de Moraes Barbosa, Alexandrius & Rebes Zilliani, Rafael & Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio & Maia Souza, Gustavo & de Almeida Silva, Marcelo, 2021. "Energy conversion efficiency in sugarcane cultivars as a function of production environments in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Farias-Ramírez, Asdrubal Jesus & Duarte, Sergio Nascimento & Moreno-Pizani, Maria Alejandra & de Oliveira Costa, Jéfferson & da Silva Barros, Timóteo Herculino & Coelho, Rubens Duarte, 2024. "Combined effect of silicon and nitrogen doses applied to planting furrows on sugar, biomass and energy water productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pazuch, Felix Augusto & Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo Camargo & Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari & Micuanski, Viviane Cavaler & Friedrich, Leandro & Lenz, Anderson Miguel, 2017. "Economic evaluation of the replacement of sugar cane bagasse by vinasse, as a source of energy in a power plant in the state of Paraná, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-42.
    2. Lopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido & Delai, Ivete & Delgado Montes, Mary Laura & Roberto Ometto, Aldo, 2014. "Life cycle assessment of the sugarcane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 532-547.
    3. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Giulio Allesina & Simone Pedrazzi, 2021. "Barriers to Success: A Technical Review on the Limits and Possible Future Roles of Small Scale Gasifiers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Liu, Liwei & Ye, Junhong & Zhao, Yufei & Zhao, Erdong, 2015. "The plight of the biomass power generation industry in China – A supply chain risk perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 680-692.
    6. White, David J. & Hubacek, Klaus & Feng, Kuishuang & Sun, Laixiang & Meng, Bo, 2018. "The Water-Energy-Food Nexus in East Asia: A tele-connected value chain analysis using inter-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 550-567.
    7. Giulio Sperandio & Mauro Pagano & Andrea Acampora & Vincenzo Civitarese & Carla Cedrola & Paolo Mattei & Roberto Tomasone, 2022. "Deficit Irrigation for Efficiency and Water Saving in Poplar Plantations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Xiao He & Anthony K. Lau & Shahab Sokhansanj, 2019. "Effect of Moisture on Gas Emissions from Stored Woody Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Holmatov, B. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & Krol, M.S., 2019. "Land, water and carbon footprints of circular bioenergy production systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 224-235.
    12. Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Anne Rödl & Martin Kaltschmitt, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioethanol Production: A Review of Feedstock, Technology and Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Xuejun Qian & Jingwen Xue & Yulai Yang & Seong W. Lee, 2021. "Thermal Properties and Combustion-Related Problems Prediction of Agricultural Crop Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Ana Luiza Fontenelle & Erik Nilsson & Ieda Geriberto Hidalgo & Cintia B. Uvo & Drielli Peyerl, 2022. "Temporal Understanding of the Water–Energy Nexus: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    17. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    18. Luo, Laipeng & Zhang, Zhiyi & Li, Chong & Nishu, & He, Fang & Zhang, Xingguang & Cai, Junmeng, 2021. "Insight into master plots method for kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Hafiz Shahzad Ahmad & Muhammad Imran & Fiaz Ahmad & Shah Rukh & Rao Muhammad Ikram & Hafiz Muhammad Rafique & Zafar Iqbal & Abdulaziz Abdullah Alsahli & Mohammed Nasser Alyemeni & Shafaqat Ali & Tanve, 2021. "Improving Water Use Efficiency through Reduced Irrigation for Sustainable Cotton Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:399-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.