IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v230y2024ics0960148124008711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improved prediction model for in-stream water wheel performance

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon-Toole, Matthew
  • Birzer, Cristian
  • Kelso, Richard

Abstract

As global efforts to decarbonise industries continue, there is increasing pressure to identify and proliferate sustainable methods of generating electricity, in-line with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 7. The in-stream water wheel is a pico-hydropower technology that generates electricity using only the kinetic energy in the fluid, rather than both potential and kinetic, like most forms of pico-hydropower. Current methods of estimating the power output of these turbines lack validation, robustness and proper justification for their assumptions. This study has developed a new method for predicting the power output of in-stream water wheels, based on fluid dynamics principles, and has been compared with a range of experimental results to confirm its robustness. The new model identifies novel characteristics of the power stroke of the turbine blade, including unsteady effects and negative torque production at certain blade angles. In addition, the model can be tuned to match experimental data, improving its accuracy in specific applications. The better prediction of power output aims to encourage the use of in-stream water wheels as part of the global decarbonisation strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon-Toole, Matthew & Birzer, Cristian & Kelso, Richard, 2024. "An improved prediction model for in-stream water wheel performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:230:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124008711
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124008711
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cleynen, Olivier & Kerikous, Emeel & Hoerner, Stefan & Thévenin, Dominique, 2018. "Characterization of the performance of a free-stream water wheel using computational fluid dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1392-1400.
    2. Waddell, R. & Bryce, P., 1999. "Micro-hydro systems for small communities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1257-1261.
    3. Paudel, Shakun & Linton, Nick & Zanke, Ulrich C.E. & Saenger, Nicole, 2013. "Experimental investigation on the effect of channel width on flexible rubber blade water wheel performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-7.
    4. Williamson, S.J. & Stark, B.H. & Booker, J.D., 2014. "Low head pico hydro turbine selection using a multi-criteria analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 43-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saber, Mohamed & Abdelall, Gamal & Ezzeldin, Riham & AbdelGawad, Ahmed Farouk & Ragab, Reda, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of the dethridge waterwheel under sluice gates in a novel design for pico hydropower generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Yang, Chunxia & Li, Qian & Hu, Xueyuan & Zheng, Yuan & Wu, Jiawei & Su, Shengzhi & Yu, An, 2023. "Fish injury analysis and flip-blade type optimization design of an undershot waterwheel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    3. Muhammad Asim & Shoaib Muhammad & Muhammad Amjad & Muhammad Abdullah & M. A. Mujtaba & M. A. Kalam & Mohamed Mousa & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar, 2022. "Design and Parametric Optimization of the High-Speed Pico Waterwheel for Rural Electrification of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Viktor Sebestyén & Mátyás Horváth & Viola Somogyi & Endre Domokos & Róbert Koch, 2022. "Network-Analysis-Supported Design Aspects and Performance Optimization of Floating Water Wheels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Jiaxin Yu & Jun Wang, 2020. "Optimization Design of a Rain-Power Utilization System Based on a Siphon and Its Application in a High-Rise Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Anilkumar, T.T. & Simon, Sishaj P. & Padhy, Narayana Prasad, 2017. "Residential electricity cost minimization model through open well-pico turbine pumped storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 23-35.
    7. Cleynen, Olivier & Engel, Sebastian & Hoerner, Stefan & Thévenin, Dominique, 2021. "Optimal design for the free-stream water wheel: A two-dimensional study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Ludovic Cassan & Guilhem Dellinger & Pascal Maussion & Nicolas Dellinger, 2021. "Hydrostatic Pressure Wheel for Regulation of Open Channel Networks and for the Energy Supply of Isolated Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Brandon-Toole, Matthew & Birzer, Cristian & Kelso, Richard, 2024. "An exploration of the wake of an in-stream water wheel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    10. Nishi, Yasuyuki & Mori, Nozomi & Yamada, Naoki & Inagaki, Terumi, 2022. "Study on the design method for axial flow runner that combines design of experiments, response surface method, and optimization method to one-dimensional design method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 96-110.
    11. Auth, Trevor L. & Wackerman, Grace E. & Garcia, Marcelo H. & Stillwell, Ashlynn S., 2021. "Low-head hydropower as a reserve power source: A case study of Northeastern Illinois," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 980-989.
    12. Lisicki, Michal & Lubitz, William & Taylor, Graham W., 2016. "Optimal design and operation of Archimedes screw turbines using Bayesian optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1404-1417.
    13. Jawahar, C.P. & Michael, Prawin Angel, 2017. "A review on turbines for micro hydro power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 882-887.
    14. Rudimar Caricimi & Géremi Gilson Dranka & Dalmarino Setti & Paula Ferreira, 2022. "Reframing the Selection of Hydraulic Turbines Integrating Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy VIKOR Multi-Criteria Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Lavrič, Henrik & Rihar, Andraž & Fišer, Rastko, 2018. "Simulation of electrical energy production in Archimedes screw-based ultra-low head small hydropower plant considering environment protection conditions and technical limitations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 87-98.
    16. Alejandro Tapia Córdoba & Daniel Gutiérrez Reina & Pablo Millán Gata, 2019. "An Evolutionary Computational Approach for Designing Micro Hydro Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Keyun Zhuang & Chaodan Gao & Ze Li & Donglin Yan & Xiangqian Fu, 2018. "Dynamic Analyses of the Hydro-Turbine Generator Shafting System Considering the Hydraulic Instability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Qian, Zhongdong & Wang, Fan & Guo, Zhiwei & Lu, Jie, 2016. "Performance evaluation of an axial-flow pump with adjustable guide vanes in turbine mode," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1146-1152.
    19. Gerardo Alcalá & Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Jose Javier Muñoz-Criollo & J. D. Revuelta-Acosta, 2021. "SHP Assessment for a Run-of-River (RoR) Scheme Using a Rectangular Mesh Sweeping Approach (MSA) Based on GIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Paudel, Shakun & Saenger, Nicole, 2018. "Effect of channel geometry on the performance of the Dethridge water wheel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 175-182.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:230:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124008711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.