IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v225y2024ics0960148124003690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of a renewable hydrogen production system by coordinating multiple PV arrays and multiple electrolyzers

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jing
  • Kang, Lixia
  • Liu, Yongzhong

Abstract

In the design of a renewable hydrogen production system (RHPS), it is of great significance to coordinate the power generation and electrolyzers for efficient and stable hydrogen production. To investigate the coordination and complementary characteristics of multiple PV arrays and multiple electrolyzers in the optimal design of RHPS, a coordinated design approach based on mathematical optimization for the optimal RHPS with multiple PV arrays and multiple electrolyzers was proposed, which features comprehensive considerations of different characteristics of power generation and economy of different types of PV arrays, and the dynamic operating characteristics and economy of various types and capacity of electrolyzers to adapt to fluctuating hydrogen demand. The optimal configuration of the RHPS with minimal total cost can be obtained by combining multiple PV arrays with multiple electrolyzers. Furthermore, the impacts of power generation on the economy of the system are systematically explored, and electrolyzer types are optimally deployed. The influence of different PV array types on the economics of the system is analyzed. An example of the RHPS was employed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Results show that for the RHPS, the selection of the type of electrolyzers is mainly affected by the characteristics of power generation. In the system with only PV arrays for power supply, the total cost of the system with proton exchange membrane electrolyzers (PEMEL) is 11.2% lower than that of the system with alkaline electrolyzers (AEL). In the system with simple wind turbines for power generation, the total cost of the system with AEL is lower than that of the system with PEMEL. The selections of type and capacity of the electrolyzers in the system are affected by the minimal power limit of the AEL. The total cost of the system can be effectively reduced by coordinating the power generation and electrolyzers and combining AEL and PEMEL in the system. The selection of PV types is related to the unit cost and the seasonal changes in the capacity factor of different PV arrays, which is also influenced by the hydrogen demand and the curtailment rate. When the variations of power generation align with hydrogen demands, the total cost can be reduced by lowering seasonal energy storage capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Liu, Yongzhong, 2024. "Optimal design of a renewable hydrogen production system by coordinating multiple PV arrays and multiple electrolyzers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003690
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124003690
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bailera, Manuel & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M. & Espatolero, Sergio, 2017. "Power to Gas projects review: Lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 292-312.
    2. Hren, Robert & Vujanović, Annamaria & Van Fan, Yee & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Krajnc, Damjan & Čuček, Lidija, 2023. "Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Mohammadi, Amin & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2018. "A comprehensive review on coupling different types of electrolyzer to renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 632-655.
    4. Lin, Haiyang & Wu, Qiuwei & Chen, Xinyu & Yang, Xi & Guo, Xinyang & Lv, Jiajun & Lu, Tianguang & Song, Shaojie & McElroy, Michael, 2021. "Economic and technological feasibility of using power-to-hydrogen technology under higher wind penetration in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 569-580.
    5. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    6. Buttler, Alexander & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2440-2454.
    7. Lewandowska-Bernat, Anna & Desideri, Umberto, 2018. "Opportunities of power-to-gas technology in different energy systems architectures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 57-67.
    8. Bhandari, Ramchandra & Shah, Ronak Rakesh, 2021. "Hydrogen as energy carrier: Techno-economic assessment of decentralized hydrogen production in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 915-931.
    9. Gabrielli, Paolo & Gazzani, Matteo & Mazzotti, Marco, 2018. "Electrochemical conversion technologies for optimal design of decentralized multi-energy systems: Modeling framework and technology assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 557-575.
    10. Nghitevelekwa, K. & Bansal, R.C., 2018. "A review of generation dispatch with large-scale photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 615-624.
    11. Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Huang, Xiankun & Liu, Yongzhong, 2021. "An analysis framework for quantitative evaluation of parametric uncertainty in a cooperated energy storage system with multiple energy carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Karakurt, Izzet & Aydin, Gokhan, 2023. "Development of regression models to forecast the CO2 emissions from fossil fuels in the BRICS and MINT countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    13. Hurtubia, Byron & Sauma, Enzo, 2021. "Economic and environmental analysis of hydrogen production when complementing renewable energy generation with grid electricity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    14. Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Liu, Yongzhong, 2022. "A multi-objective approach to determine time series aggregation strategies for optimal design of multi-energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Iva Ridjan Skov & Noémi Schneider & Gerald Schweiger & Josef-Peter Schöggl & Alfred Posch, 2021. "Power-to-X in Denmark: An Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Corey Duncan & Robin Roche & Samir Jemei & Marie-Cécile Péra, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Post-Print hal-03692975, HAL.
    5. Hermesmann, M. & Grübel, K. & Scherotzki, L. & Müller, T.E., 2021. "Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Schlund, David & Theile, Philipp, 2022. "Simultaneity of green energy and hydrogen production: Analysing the dispatch of a grid-connected electrolyser," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Daniarta, S. & Sowa, D. & Błasiak, P. & Imre, A.R. & Kolasiński, P., 2024. "Techno-economic survey of enhancing Power-to-Methane efficiency via waste heat recovery from electrolysis and biomethanation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Petkov, Ivalin & Gabrielli, Paolo, 2020. "Power-to-hydrogen as seasonal energy storage: an uncertainty analysis for optimal design of low-carbon multi-energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    10. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and thermoeconomic analysis of a power to gas system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Schlund, David & Theile, Philipp, 2021. "Simultaneity of green energy and hydrogen production: Analysing the dispatch of a grid-connected electrolyser," EWI Working Papers 2021-10, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    12. Duncan, Corey & Roche, Robin & Jemei, Samir & Pera, Marie-Cécile, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    13. Gorre, Jachin & Ortloff, Felix & van Leeuwen, Charlotte, 2019. "Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized Power-to-Gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    15. David Borge-Diez & Enrique Rosales-Asensio & Emin Açıkkalp & Daniel Alonso-Martínez, 2023. "Analysis of Power to Gas Technologies for Energy Intensive Industries in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Klöckner, Kai & Letmathe, Peter, 2020. "Is the coherence of coal phase-out and electrolytic hydrogen production the golden path to effective decarbonisation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    17. Martin Thema & Tobias Weidlich & Manuel Hörl & Annett Bellack & Friedemann Mörs & Florian Hackl & Matthias Kohlmayer & Jasmin Gleich & Carsten Stabenau & Thomas Trabold & Michael Neubert & Felix Ortlo, 2019. "Biological CO 2 -Methanation: An Approach to Standardization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-32, May.
    18. Lee, Boreum & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of H2 energy storage system based on renewable energy certificate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 91-98.
    19. Zhao, Meng-Jie & He, Qian & Xiang, Ting & Ya, Hua-Qin & Luo, Hao & Wan, Shanhong & Ding, Jun & He, Jian-Bo, 2023. "Automatic operation of decoupled water electrolysis based on bipolar electrode," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 583-591.
    20. Superchi, Francesco & Papi, Francesco & Mannelli, Andrea & Balduzzi, Francesco & Ferro, Francesco Maria & Bianchini, Alessandro, 2023. "Development of a reliable simulation framework for techno-economic analyses on green hydrogen production from wind farms using alkaline electrolyzers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 731-742.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.