IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v224y2024ics0960148124001642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate, water, hydropower, wind speed and wind energy potential resources assessments using weather time series data, downscaled regional circulation models: A case study for Mono River Basin in the Gulf of Guinea region

Author

Listed:
  • Batablinlè, Lamboni
  • Bazyomo, Serge Dimitri
  • Badou, Félicien D.
  • Jean, Hounkpè
  • Hodabalo, Kamou
  • Zakari, Djibib
  • Banna, Magolmeena
  • Lawin, Agnidé Emmanuel

Abstract

Hydropower and wind energy are important renewable energies source in Gulf Guinea region, but they are sensitive to climate change, because the changing climate may alter atmospheric and hydrological conditions. In this study, firstly we analyzed the historical hydro-climate data in connection with changes in Mono river of Gulf Guinea region discharge and their associated impacts on hydropower generation and assessed the future hydropower availability in different climate scenarios. Secondly, statistical methods are used to examine past and future wind speed (WS) and wind energy potential. We used historical data (1981–2010) obtained from the National Meteorology Agency in Togo and Benin and a multi-model ensemble for future projections data (2021–2050) of eight selected Regional Climate Models (RCMs) under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) under scenarios 4.5 and 8.5. We found in the recent past years that the temperature and evaporation increase during dry season, while flows and hydropower generation decreased. The multi-model ensemble used have announced that in general, the decreasing trend of the rainfall and increasing trend of temperature is projected to be higher in RCP 8.5 than RCP 4.5, in the near future (2021–2050). Overall, the annual hydropower potential the hydropower will decrease between 8 and 19.3% under the RCP4.5 and 9 and 29% under the RCP8.5 while the monthly hydropower potential is projected to decrease by 4–41% under the RCP4.5 and by 6–47% under the RCP8.5 in the same period. Concerning the wind speed and the potential wind power, the observed results show that both the Weibull and Rayleigh approximations provided a better fit for the wind speed data. The projected of wind speed and wind power density (2021–2050) at an annual timescale is similar to the monthly timescale of wind speed and wind power density at 90 m height. The multi-model ensemble indicate that projected wind speeds (WS) are between 5 and 10 m/s under the RCP4.5 and, between 3 and 12 m/s under the RCP8.5 while wind power density is projected by 15–250 w/m2, and by 13–357 w/m2 under the RCP4.5 and under the RCP8.5, respectively. South and North of Mono basin, have higher WPD and are promising for installing wind turbines for small-scale power generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Batablinlè, Lamboni & Bazyomo, Serge Dimitri & Badou, Félicien D. & Jean, Hounkpè & Hodabalo, Kamou & Zakari, Djibib & Banna, Magolmeena & Lawin, Agnidé Emmanuel, 2024. "Climate, water, hydropower, wind speed and wind energy potential resources assessments using weather time series data, downscaled regional circulation models: A case study for Mono River Basin in the ," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124001642
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124001642
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Celik, Ali Naci, 2004. "A statistical analysis of wind power density based on the Weibull and Rayleigh models at the southern region of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 593-604.
    2. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Davy, Richard & Gnatiuk, Natalia & Pettersson, Lasse & Bobylev, Leonid, 2018. "Climate change impacts on wind energy potential in the European domain with a focus on the Black Sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1652-1659.
    4. Safari, Bonfils, 2011. "Modeling wind speed and wind power distributions in Rwanda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 925-935, February.
    5. Jarosław Brodny & Magdalena Tutak, 2020. "Analyzing Similarities between the European Union Countries in Terms of the Structure and Volume of Energy Production from Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-37, February.
    6. Breslow, Paul B. & Sailor, David J., 2002. "Vulnerability of wind power resources to climate change in the continental United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 585-598.
    7. Mentis, Dimitrios & Hermann, Sebastian & Howells, Mark & Welsch, Manuel & Siyal, Shahid Hussain, 2015. "Assessing the technical wind energy potential in Africa a GIS-based approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 110-125.
    8. Chang, Tian Pau, 2011. "Performance comparison of six numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 272-282, January.
    9. Kwami Senam A. Sedzro & Adekunlé Akim Salami & Pierre Akuété Agbessi & Mawugno Koffi Kodjo, 2022. "Comparative Study of Wind Energy Potential Estimation Methods for Wind Sites in Togo and Benin (West Sub-Saharan Africa)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    10. Isabelle Tobin & Robert Vautard & Irena Balog & François-Marie Bréon & Sonia Jerez & Paolo Ruti & Françoise Thais & Mathieu Vrac & Pascal Yiou, 2015. "Assessing climate change impacts on European wind energy from ENSEMBLES high-resolution climate projections," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 99-112, January.
    11. Nguyen, Kim Hanh & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2019. "Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: Some evidence from panel cointegration analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1049-1057.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. deCastro, M. & Rusu, L. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Ribeiro, A. & Costoya, X. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2024. "Different approaches to analyze the impact of future climate change on the exploitation of wave energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Katopodis, Theodoros & Markantonis, Iason & Vlachogiannis, Diamando & Politi, Nadia & Sfetsos, Athanasios, 2021. "Assessing climate change impacts on wind characteristics in Greece through high resolution regional climate modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 427-444.
    3. Kwami Senam A. Sedzro & Adekunlé Akim Salami & Pierre Akuété Agbessi & Mawugno Koffi Kodjo, 2022. "Comparative Study of Wind Energy Potential Estimation Methods for Wind Sites in Togo and Benin (West Sub-Saharan Africa)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Usta, Ilhan, 2016. "An innovative estimation method regarding Weibull parameters for wind energy applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 301-314.
    5. Rusu, Eugen, 2020. "An evaluation of the wind energy dynamics in the Baltic Sea, past and future projections," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 350-362.
    6. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Justė Jankevičienė & Arvydas Kanapickas, 2021. "Projected Near-Surface Wind Speed Trends in Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Vu Dinh, Quang & Doan, Quang-Van & Ngo-Duc, Thanh & Nguyen Dinh, Van & Dinh Duc, Nguyen, 2022. "Offshore wind resource in the context of global climate change over a tropical area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    10. Akintayo T. Abolude & Wen Zhou & Akintomide Afolayan Akinsanola, 2020. "Evaluation and Projections of Wind Power Resources over China for the Energy Industry Using CMIP5 Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Mehr Gul & Nengling Tai & Wentao Huang & Muhammad Haroon Nadeem & Moduo Yu, 2019. "Assessment of Wind Power Potential and Economic Analysis at Hyderabad in Pakistan: Powering to Local Communities Using Wind Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    12. He, J.Y. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W. & Zhao, X.D., 2023. "Assessment of future wind resources under climate change using a multi-model and multi-method ensemble approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    13. Abul Kalam Azad & Mohammad Golam Rasul & Talal Yusaf, 2014. "Statistical Diagnosis of the Best Weibull Methods for Wind Power Assessment for Agricultural Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, May.
    14. Gao, Yang & Ma, Shaoxiu & Wang, Tao & Miao, Changhong & Yang, Fan, 2022. "Distributed onshore wind farm siting using intelligent optimization algorithm based on spatial and temporal variability of wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    15. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Devrim, Yilser, 2019. "Theoretical derivation of wind plant power distribution with the consideration of wind turbine reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 192-197.
    16. Allouhi, A. & Zamzoum, O. & Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Kousksou, T. & Jamil, A. & Derouich, A., 2017. "Evaluation of wind energy potential in Morocco's coastal regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 311-324.
    17. Wen, Jun & Okolo, Chukwuemeka Valentine & Ugwuoke, Ifeanyi Celestine & Kolani, Kibir, 2022. "Research on influencing factors of renewable energy, energy efficiency, on technological innovation. Does trade, investment and human capital development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Russell McKenna & Stefan Pfenninger & Heidi Heinrichs & Johannes Schmidt & Iain Staffell & Katharina Gruber & Andrea N. Hahmann & Malte Jansen & Michael Klingler & Natascha Landwehr & Xiaoli Guo Lars', 2021. "Reviewing methods and assumptions for high-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy potential assessments," Papers 2103.09781, arXiv.org.
    19. Avazkhodjaev S. Shakhabiddinovich & Noor Azuddin bin Yakob & Lau Wee Yeap, 2022. "Asymmetric Effect of Renewable Energy Generation and Clean Energy on Green Economy Stock Price: ANonlinear ARDL Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 407-415.
    20. Sergei Kolesnik & Yossi Rabinovitz & Michael Byalsky & Asher Yahalom & Alon Kuperman, 2023. "Assessment of Wind Speed Statistics in Samaria Region and Potential Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-35, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124001642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.