IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v221y2024ics0960148123016841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the prediction of extreme wind speed events with generative data augmentation techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Vega-Bayo, M.
  • Pérez-Aracil, J.
  • Prieto-Godino, L.
  • Salcedo-Sanz, S.

Abstract

Extreme Wind Speed events (EWS) are responsible for the worst damages caused by wind in wind farms. An accurate estimation of the frequency and intensity of EWS is essential to avoid wind turbine damage and to minimize cut-out events in these facilities. In this paper we discuss how generative Data Augmentation (DA) techniques improve the performance of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms in EWS prediction problems. These problems are usually tackled as classification tasks, which are highly unbalanced due to the small number of EWS events in wind farms. Different versions of Variational AutoEncoders (VAE) are proposed and analysed in this work (VAEs, Conditional VAEs (CVAEs) and Class-Informed VAEs (CI-VAE)) as generative DA techniques to balance the data in EWS problems, leading to better performance of the prediction systems. The proposed generative DA techniques have been compared against traditional DA algorithms in a real problem of EWS prediction in Spain, considering ERA5 reanalysis data as predictive variables. The results showed that the CI-VAE with a Convolutional Neural Network approach obtained the best results, with values of Precision 0.62, Recall 0.74 and F1 score 0.67, improving up to 4% the results of the method without data augmentation techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Vega-Bayo, M. & Pérez-Aracil, J. & Prieto-Godino, L. & Salcedo-Sanz, S., 2024. "Improving the prediction of extreme wind speed events with generative data augmentation techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123016841
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123016841
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Rebecca & Lazakis, Iraklis & Barbouchi, Sami & Johanning, Lars, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of offshore wind farm operation and maintenance cost and availability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1226-1236.
    2. Peláez-Rodríguez, C. & Pérez-Aracil, J. & Fister, D. & Prieto-Godino, L. & Deo, R.C. & Salcedo-Sanz, S., 2022. "A hierarchical classification/regression algorithm for improving extreme wind speed events prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 157-178.
    3. Cannon, D.J. & Brayshaw, D.J. & Methven, J. & Coker, P.J. & Lenaghan, D., 2015. "Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics: A 33 year case study in Great Britain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 767-778.
    4. Zhang, Kequan & Qu, Zongxi & Dong, Yunxuan & Lu, Haiyan & Leng, Wennan & Wang, Jianzhou & Zhang, Wenyu, 2019. "Research on a combined model based on linear and nonlinear features - A case study of wind speed forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 814-830.
    5. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Iniyan, S. & Sreevalsan, E. & Rajapandian, S., 2007. "A review of wind energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 1117-1145, August.
    6. Yeh, Tsu-Ming & Huang, Yu-Lang, 2014. "Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 159-169.
    7. Pes, Marcelo P. & Pereira, Enio B. & Marengo, Jose A. & Martins, Fernando R. & Heinemann, Detlev & Schmidt, Michael, 2017. "Climate trends on the extreme winds in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 110-120.
    8. Wang, Jianzhou & Qin, Shanshan & Jin, Shiqiang & Wu, Jie, 2015. "Estimation methods review and analysis of offshore extreme wind speeds and wind energy resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 26-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peláez-Rodríguez, C. & Pérez-Aracil, J. & Fister, D. & Prieto-Godino, L. & Deo, R.C. & Salcedo-Sanz, S., 2022. "A hierarchical classification/regression algorithm for improving extreme wind speed events prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 157-178.
    2. Zuo, Yangjie & Montesano, John & Singh, Chandra Veer, 2018. "Assessing progressive failure in long wind turbine blades under quasi-static and cyclic loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 754-766.
    3. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2018. "On the inter-annual variability of wind energy generation – A case study from Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 845-854.
    4. Bracale, Antonio & Carpinelli, Guido & De Falco, Pasquale, 2017. "A new finite mixture distribution and its expectation-maximization procedure for extreme wind speed characterization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1366-1377.
    5. Christopher Jung & Dirk Schindler & Alexander Buchholz & Jessica Laible, 2017. "Global Gust Climate Evaluation and Its Influence on Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Russell McKenna & Stefan Pfenninger & Heidi Heinrichs & Johannes Schmidt & Iain Staffell & Katharina Gruber & Andrea N. Hahmann & Malte Jansen & Michael Klingler & Natascha Landwehr & Xiaoli Guo Lars', 2021. "Reviewing methods and assumptions for high-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy potential assessments," Papers 2103.09781, arXiv.org.
    7. McKenna, Russell & Pfenninger, Stefan & Heinrichs, Heidi & Schmidt, Johannes & Staffell, Iain & Bauer, Christian & Gruber, Katharina & Hahmann, Andrea N. & Jansen, Malte & Klingler, Michael & Landwehr, 2022. "High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 659-684.
    8. Yuyang Gao & Chao Qu & Kequan Zhang, 2016. "A Hybrid Method Based on Singular Spectrum Analysis, Firefly Algorithm, and BP Neural Network for Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Liang, Tao & Zhao, Qing & Lv, Qingzhao & Sun, Hexu, 2021. "A novel wind speed prediction strategy based on Bi-LSTM, MOOFADA and transfer learning for centralized control centers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Pan, Jeh-Nan & Nguyen, Hung Thi Ngoc, 2015. "Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 179-190.
    11. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Vassilis M. Charitopoulos & Mathilde Fajardy & Chi Kong Chyong & David M. Reiner, 2022. "The case of 100% electrification of domestic heat in Great Britain," Working Papers EPRG2206, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    13. Ahmed Al-Ajmi & Yingzhao Wang & Siniša Djurović, 2021. "Wind Turbine Generator Controller Signals Supervised Machine Learning for Shaft Misalignment Fault Detection: A Doubly Fed Induction Generator Practical Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Leijon, Mats & Skoglund, Annika & Waters, Rafael & Rehn, Alf & Lindahl, Marcus, 2010. "On the physics of power, energy and economics of renewable electric energy sources – Part I," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1729-1734.
    17. Chang, Yue & Jia, Yulong & Hong, Tan, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis and multi-objective optimization of an innovative power generation system using biomass gasification and LNG regasification processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    18. Laura Canale & Anna Rita Di Fazio & Mario Russo & Andrea Frattolillo & Marco Dell’Isola, 2021. "An Overview on Functional Integration of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Multi-Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    19. Moura Carneiro, F.O. & Barbosa Rocha, H.H. & Costa Rocha, P.A., 2013. "Investigation of possible societal risk associated with wind power generation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 30-36.
    20. Ramirez Camargo, Luis & Gruber, Katharina & Nitsch, Felix, 2019. "Assessing variables of regional reanalysis data sets relevant for modelling small-scale renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1468-1478.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123016841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.