IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v180y2021icp691-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microaerophilic treatment enhanced organic matter removal and methane production rates during swine wastewater treatment: A long-term engineering evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Guimarães de Oliveira, Maurício
  • Marques Mourão, José Marcos
  • Marques de Oliveira, Ana Katherinne
  • Bezerra dos Santos, André
  • Lopes Pereira, Erlon

Abstract

Anaerobic biotechnology has been widely used for swine wastewater (SWW) treatment. However, its organic loading rate (OLR) is far lower than expected, mainly because of the low rate of hydrolysis. In this study, the comparative process performance and efficiency of an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor (R1) and an up-flow microaerobic sludge blanket (UMSB) reactor (R2) were evaluated for SWW treatment, operating for 264 days under higher OLRs and lower hydraulic retention times than those found in the literature. The R2 was subjected to the three different air doses: 0.09 (stage I), 0.17 (stage II), and 0.25 (stage III) LO2 Lfeed−1 d−1 aiming at enhancing the hydrolysis step of the anaerobic digestion (AD). The overall results showed that 0.17 LO2 Lfeed−1 d−1 was the best experimental condition evaluated, which provided volatile suspended solids, total chemical oxygen demand, and particulate chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies of 85.0 ± 1.9%, 83.8 ± 2.5%, and 82.1 ± 4.8%, respectively. This performance was due to the higher organic matter hydrolysis, resulting in higher methane production. Therefore, the UMSB reactor treatment was demonstrated to be a feasible alternative for SWW, although some strategies to control biomass washout must be investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Guimarães de Oliveira, Maurício & Marques Mourão, José Marcos & Marques de Oliveira, Ana Katherinne & Bezerra dos Santos, André & Lopes Pereira, Erlon, 2021. "Microaerophilic treatment enhanced organic matter removal and methane production rates during swine wastewater treatment: A long-term engineering evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 691-699.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:180:y:2021:i:c:p:691-699
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014812101288X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajendran, Karthik & Mahapatra, Durgamadhab & Venkatraman, Arun Venkatesh & Muthuswamy, Shanmugaprakash & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, 2020. "Advancing anaerobic digestion through two-stage processes: Current developments and future trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2012. "Formation and impact of granules in fostering clean energy production and wastewater treatment in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1696-1708.
    3. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    4. Yang, Hongnan & Deng, Liangwei & Wang, Lan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Wang, Shuang & Huang, Fangyu, 2019. "Comparison of three biomass-retaining reactors of the ASBR, the UBF and the USR treating swine wastewater for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 521-530.
    5. Couras, C.S. & Louros, V.L. & Grilo, A.M. & Leitão, J.H. & Capela, M.I. & Arroja, L.M. & Nadais, M.H., 2014. "Effects of operational shocks on key microbial populations for biogas production in UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 866-874.
    6. Kothari, Richa & Pandey, A.K. & Kumar, S. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2014. "Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bio-energy: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 174-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Yang, Min & Watson, Jamison & Wang, Zixin & Si, Buchun & Jiang, Weizhong & Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2022. "Understanding and design of two-stage fermentation: A perspective of interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Mahmudul, H.M. & Rasul, M.G. & Akbar, D. & Narayanan, R. & Mofijur, M., 2022. "Food waste as a source of sustainable energy: Technical, economical, environmental and regulatory feasibility analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Wang, Zhongzhong & Hu, Yuansheng & Wang, Shun & Wu, Guangxue & Zhan, Xinmin, 2023. "A critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Zhao, Jiamin & Hou, Tingting & Wang, Qian & Zhang, Zhenya & Lei, Zhongfang & Shimizu, Kazuya & Guo, Wenshan & Ngo, Huu Hao, 2021. "Application of biogas recirculation in anaerobic granular sludge system for multifunctional sewage sludge management with high efficacy energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    7. Tian, Wenjing & Li, Jianhao & Zhu, Lirong & Li, Wen & He, Linyan & Gu, Li & Deng, Rui & Shi, Dezhi & Chai, Hongxiang & Gao, Meng, 2021. "Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1321-1332.
    8. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Noor, Zainura Zainon & Chong, Chun Shiong & Stringer, Lindsay C & Glew, David, 2020. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Capson-Tojo, G. & Moscoviz, R. & Astals, S. & Robles, Á. & Steyer, J.-P., 2020. "Unraveling the literature chaos around free ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    11. Tang, Shuai & Wang, Zixin & Lu, Haifeng & Si, Buchun & Wang, Chaoyuan & Jiang, Weizhong, 2023. "Design of stage-separated anaerobic digestion: Principles, applications, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Nie, Erqi & He, Pinjing & Zhang, Hua & Hao, Liping & Shao, Liming & Lü, Fan, 2021. "How does temperature regulate anaerobic digestion?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Shen, Liang & Zhao, Qingchuan & Wu, Xuee & Li, Xiangzhen & Li, Qingbiao & Wang, Yuanpeng, 2016. "Interspecies electron transfer in syntrophic methanogenic consortia: From cultures to bioreactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1358-1367.
    15. Zang, Xiaoya & Wang, Jing & He, Yong & Zhou, Xuebing & Liang, Deqing, 2022. "Experimental investigation of hydrate formation kinetics and microscopic properties by a synthesized ternary gas mixture with combination additives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    17. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Herrera Adarme, Oscar Fernando & Baêta, Bruno Eduardo Lobo & Alves Gurgel, Leandro Vinícius & de Ávila Rodrigues, Fabio & Aquino, Sérgio Francisco de, 2022. "Is anaerobic co-digestion the missing link to integrate sugarcane biorefinery?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 488-496.
    19. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    20. Feng, Qunjie & Lin, Yunqin, 2017. "Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1272-1287.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:180:y:2021:i:c:p:691-699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.