IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i8p1208-1217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spurious activation of safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry: Basic concepts and formulas

Author

Listed:
  • Lundteigen, Mary Ann
  • Rausand, Marvin

Abstract

Spurious activation of safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry may lead to production loss, stress on affected components and systems, and hazards during system restoration. This article defines and clarifies concepts related to spurious activation. A clear distinction is made between spurious operation, spurious trip, and spurious shutdown. The causes and effects of spurious activation are discussed and related to the concepts used in IEC 61508, IEC 61511, and OREDA. A new set of formulas for calculating the spurious activation rate is presented, and compared with formulas that are frequently used in the oil and gas industry. The new approach is illustrated in a simple case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin, 2008. "Spurious activation of safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry: Basic concepts and formulas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1208-1217.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:8:p:1208-1217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007001974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Lixuan & Jiang, Jin, 2007. "Analysis of on-line maintenance strategies for k-out-of-n standby safety systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 144-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer, 2009. "Integrating RAMS engineering and management with the safety life cycle of IEC 61508," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1894-1903.
    2. Fu, Jianmin & Li, Honghao & Chi, Yajuan & Zhen, Jia & Xu, Xiangfeng, 2021. "nSIL Evaluation and Sensitivity Study of Diverse Redundant Structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Azizpour, Hooshyar & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Analysis of simplification in Markov-based models for performance assessment of Safety Instrumented System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 252-260.
    4. Longhi, Antonio Eduardo Bier & Pessoa, Artur Alves & Garcia, Pauli Adriano de Almada, 2015. "Multiobjective optimization of strategies for operation and testing of low-demand safety instrumented systems using a genetic algorithm and fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 525-538.
    5. Wu, Shengnan & Zhang, Laibin & Zheng, Wenpei & Liu, Yiliu & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Reliability modeling of subsea SISs partial testing subject to delayed restoration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Innal, Fares & Dutuit, Yves & Chebila, Mourad, 2015. "Safety and operational integrity evaluation and design optimization of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 32-50.
    7. Torres-Echeverría, A.C. & Martorell, S. & Thompson, H.A., 2009. "Modelling and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 838-854.
    8. Qi, Meng & Kan, Yufeng & Li, Xun & Wang, Xiaoying & Zhao, Dongfeng & Moon, Il, 2020. "Spurious activation and operational integrity evaluation of redundant safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Meng, Huixing & Kloul, Leïla & Rauzy, Antoine, 2018. "Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 111-123.
    10. Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin, 2009. "Architectural constraints in IEC 61508: Do they have the intended effect?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 520-525.
    11. Innal, Fares & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Liu, Yiliu & Barros, Anne, 2016. "PFDavg generalized formulas for SIS subject to partial and full periodic tests based on multi-phase Markov models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 160-170.
    12. Jin, Hui & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin, 2011. "Reliability performance of safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low- and high-demand mode of operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 365-373.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Meng & Kan, Yufeng & Li, Xun & Wang, Xiaoying & Zhao, Dongfeng & Moon, Il, 2020. "Spurious activation and operational integrity evaluation of redundant safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2016. "Clustering condition-based maintenance for systems with redundancy and economic dependencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 531-540.
    3. Torres-Echeverría, A.C. & Martorell, S. & Thompson, H.A., 2011. "Modeling safety instrumented systems with MooN voting architectures addressing system reconfiguration for testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 545-563.
    4. Torres-Echeverría, A.C. & Martorell, S. & Thompson, H.A., 2012. "Multi-objective optimization of design and testing of safety instrumented systems with MooN voting architectures using a genetic algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 45-60.
    5. Guo, Linhan & Li, Ruiyang & Wang, Yu & Yang, Jun & Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Zhang, Jianguo, 2023. "Availability for multi-component k-out-of-n: G warm-standby system in series with shut-off rule of suspended animation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Son, Kwang Seop & Seong, Seung Hwan & Kang, Hyun Gook & Jang, Gwi Sook, 2020. "Development of state-based integrated dependability model of RPS in NPPs considering CCF and periodic testing effects at the early design phase," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Shin, Sung Min & Jeon, In Seop & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2015. "Surveillance test and monitoring strategy for the availability improvement of standby equipment using age-dependent model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 100-106.
    8. Qi, Faqun & Yang, Huaqing & Wei, Lai & Shu, Xinting, 2024. "Preventive maintenance policy optimization for a weighted k-out-of-n: G system using the survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    9. Uit Het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and load-sharing optimization for two-unit systems with economic dependency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1119-1131.
    10. Zhou, Xiaojun & Lu, Zhiqiang & Xi, Lifeng, 2012. "Preventive maintenance optimization for a multi-component system under changing job shop schedule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 14-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:8:p:1208-1217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.