IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v92y2007i9p1231-1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA): A new method for improved fault tree analysis (FTA), reliability and safety calculations

Author

Listed:
  • Shalev, Dan M.
  • Tiran, Joseph

Abstract

Condition-based maintenance methods have changed systems reliability in general and individual systems in particular. Yet, this change does not affect system reliability analysis. System fault tree analysis (FTA) is performed during the design phase. It uses components failure rates derived from available sources as handbooks, etc. Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA) starts with the known FTA. Condition monitoring (CM) methods applied to systems (e.g. vibration analysis, oil analysis, electric current analysis, bearing CM, electric motor CM, and so forth) are used to determine updated failure rate values of sensitive components. The CBFTA method accepts updated failure rates and applies them to the FTA. The CBFTA recalculates periodically the top event (TE) failure rate (λTE) thus determining the probability of system failure and the probability of successful system operation—i.e. the system's reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalev, Dan M. & Tiran, Joseph, 2007. "Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA): A new method for improved fault tree analysis (FTA), reliability and safety calculations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1231-1241.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:9:p:1231-1241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832006001645
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & Amyotte, Paul, 2012. "Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 36-44.
    2. Luo, Pengcheng & Hu, Yang, 2013. "System risk evolution analysis and risk critical event identification based on event sequence diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 36-44.
    3. Jibiao Zhou & Xinhua Mao & Yiting Wang & Minjie Zhang & Sheng Dong, 2019. "Risk Assessment in Urban Large-Scale Public Spaces Using Dempster-Shafer Theory: An Empirical Study in Ningbo, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Liu, Aihua & Chen, Ke & Huang, Xiaofei & Li, Didi & Zhang, Xiaochun, 2021. "Dynamic risk assessment model of buried gas pipelines based on system dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. He, Zhichao & Wang, Yanhui & Xia, Weifu & Shen, Yue & Hao, Yucheng & Ren, Qiuyang, 2023. "A method for reliability assessment of complex electromechanical system based on improved network connectivity entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    6. Zhang, Yimin & Shortle, John & Sherry, Lance, 2015. "Methodology for collision risk assessment of an airspace flow corridor concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 444-455.
    7. Babaleye, Ahmed O. & Kurt, Rafet Emek & Khan, Faisal, 2019. "Safety analysis of plugging and abandonment of oil and gas wells in uncertain conditions with limited data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 133-141.
    8. He, Rui & Zhu, Jingyu & Chen, Guoming & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "A real-time probabilistic risk assessment method for the petrochemical industry based on data monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Yılmaz, Emre & German, Brian J. & Pritchett, Amy R., 2023. "Optimizing resource allocations to improve system reliability via the propagation of statistical moments through fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & Amyotte, Paul, 2011. "Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 925-932.
    11. Darwish, Molham & Almouahed, Shaban & de Lamotte, Florent, 2017. "The integration of expert-defined importance factors to enrich Bayesian Fault Tree Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 81-90.
    12. Kim, Jaehoon & Jeong, Hyun- Yong, 2013. "Evaluation of the adequacy of maintenance tasks using the failure consequences of railroad vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 30-39.
    13. Xing, Jinduo & Zeng, Zhiguo & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "A framework for dynamic risk assessment with condition monitoring data and inspection data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Xingyu Xiao & Jingang Liang & Jiejuan Tong & Haitao Wang, 2024. "Emergency Decision Support Techniques for Nuclear Power Plants: Current State, Challenges, and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-35, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:9:p:1231-1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.