IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v91y2006i3p270-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Man Cheol
  • Seong, Poong Hyun

Abstract

Simulation-based human reliability analysis (HRA) methods such as IDAC seem to provide a new direction for the development of advanced HRA methods. In such simulation-based HRA methods, the simulation model for the situation assessment of nuclear power plant (NPP) operators is essential, especially for addressing the issue of errors-of-commission (EOCs). Therefore, we propose an analytic model for the situation assessment of NPP operators based on Bayesian inference. The proposed model is found to be able to address several important features of the situation assessment of NPP operators, and is expected to provide good approximations to some parts of the situation assessment. A comparison with an existing model and identification of several other features of the situation assessment of NPP operators that should be further addressed are also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Man Cheol & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2006. "An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 270-282.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:3:p:270-282
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832005000487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Hyun-Chul & Seong, Poong-Hyun, 2009. "A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1796-1805.
    2. Naderpour, Mohsen & Lu, Jie & Zhang, Guangquan, 2015. "An abnormal situation modeling method to assist operators in safety-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 33-47.
    3. Kim, Man Cheol & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2008. "A method for identifying instrument faults in nuclear power plants possibly leading to wrong situation assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 316-324.
    4. Mkrtchyan, L. & Podofillini, L. & Dang, V.N., 2015. "Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-16.
    5. Lee, Seung Jun & Kim, Man Cheol & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2008. "An analytical approach to quantitative effect estimation of operation advisory system based on human cognitive process using the Bayesian belief network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 567-577.
    6. Ha, Jun Su & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2009. "A human–machine interface evaluation method: A difficulty evaluation method in information searching (DEMIS)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1557-1567.
    7. You, Qidong & Guo, Jianbin & Zeng, Shengkui & Che, Haiyang, 2024. "A dynamic Bayesian network based reliability assessment method for short-term multi-round situation awareness considering round dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:3:p:270-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.