IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v217y2022ics095183202100555x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SLIM based methodology for human error probability calculation of bunker spills in maritime operations

Author

Listed:
  • Kayisoglu, Gizem
  • Gunes, Bunyamin
  • Besikci, Elif Bal

Abstract

System reliability assessment is among the main acts in the operation and maintenance of every industrial and service sector, which also applies to maritime transportation system. Safety is an important parameter for system reliability assessment and a top priority for maritime transportation sector due to its direct effects on the environment, human life, and goods transported. Because human factor plays a very critical role on improving safety onboard, reliability assessment becomes vital for researchers and decision makers. The human factor also has an important role in bunkering operations. Bunkering is a routine operation on a ship which has been the cause of several accidental oil spills in the past. To prevent environmental damages caused by oil spill, bunkering operation requires careful planning, utmost care and high performance of the ship's crew. In this regard, the prediction of human error probabilities offers an advantage to prevent environmental pollution at sea and also provides a high level of safety in maritime industry. Therefore, the aim of this study is to calculate human error probabilities in bunkering operation by using Success Likelihood Index Method (SLIM). This study can also be used as a decision-making tool by ship's crew for improving safety at sea and preventing ship-based oil spill through providing a strategic and effective approach in bunkering operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kayisoglu, Gizem & Gunes, Bunyamin & Besikci, Elif Bal, 2022. "SLIM based methodology for human error probability calculation of bunker spills in maritime operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:217:y:2022:i:c:s095183202100555x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202100555X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Ladan, S.B. & Turan, O., 2012. "Human reliability analysis—Taxonomy and praxes of human entropy boundary conditions for marine and offshore applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 43-54.
    2. Editors, 2019. "Software updates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(3), pages 748-751, September.
    3. ., 2017. "Lessons from the CARIFORUM EPA," Chapters, in: North-South Regional Trade Agreements as Legal Regimes, chapter 9, pages 268-301, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Filip, Ondrej & Janda, Karel & Kristoufek, Ladislav & Zilberman, David, 2019. "Food versus fuel: An updated and expanded evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 152-166.
    5. Kathryn Kinuyo Yamamoto & Rhonda S. Black & JoAnn W. L. Yuen, 2017. "Lessons Learned from a Culturally Responsive Case Study," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(3), pages 210-228, September.
    6. Park, Kyung S. & Lee, Jae in, 2008. "A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP–SLIM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 578-587.
    7. Luuk P.A. Simons & Maurits P.J. Hafkamp & David Van Bodegom & Adrie Dumaij & Catholijn M. Jonker, 2017. "Improving employee health; lessons from an RCT," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 341-353.
    8. Editors, 2019. "Software updates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(1), pages 260-260, March.
    9. Kirwan, Barry & Gibson, W. Huw & Hickling, Brian, 2008. "Human error data collection as a precursor to the development of a human reliability assessment capability in air traffic management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 217-233.
    10. He, Xuhong & Wang, Yao & Shen, Zupei & Huang, Xiangrui, 2008. "A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 298-306.
    11. Editors, 2019. "Software updates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(2), pages 497-497, June.
    12. Anders Åslund, 2017. "Lessons from the Collapse of the Ruble Zone," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(04), pages 12-18, January.
    13. Junjie Zhang & Zhenxuan Wang & Xinming Du, 2017. "Lessons learned from Chinas regional carbon market pilots," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Shen & Xiaoxue Ma & Weiliang Qiao, 2022. "A Model to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Maritime Shipping Risk Mitigation System by Entropy-Based Capability Degradation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-34, July.
    2. Liu, Hu-Chen & Wang, Jing-Hui & Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Qi-Zhen, 2022. "New success likelihood index model for large group human reliability analysis considering noncooperative behaviors and social network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Zhou, Jian-Lan & Yu, Ze-Tai & Xiao, Ren-Bin, 2022. "A large-scale group Success Likelihood Index Method to estimate human error probabilities in the railway driving process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Tao, Longlong & Chen, Liwei & Ge, Daochuan & Yao, Yuantao & Ruan, Fang & Wu, Jie & Yu, Jie, 2022. "An integrated probabilistic risk assessment methodology for maritime transportation of spent nuclear fuel based on event tree and hydrodynamic model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Busquet, Milande & Bosma, Niels & Hummels, Harry, 2021. "A multidimensional perspective on child labor in the value chain: The case of the cocoa value chain in West Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Patriarca, Riccardo & Ramos, Marilia & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Massaiu, Salvatore & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Boring, Ronald Laurids, 2020. "Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Sun, Zhiqiang & Li, Zhengyi & Gong, Erling & Xie, Hongwei, 2012. "Estimating Human Error Probability using a modified CREAM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 28-32.
    4. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Kyriakidis, Miltos & Majumdar, Arnab & Ochieng, Washington Y., 2018. "The human performance railway operational index—a novel approach to assess human performance for railway operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 226-243.
    7. Ondřej Filip & Karel Janda & Ladislav Krištoufek, 2018. "Ceny biopaliv a souvisejících komodit: analýza s použitím metod minimální kostry grafu a hierarchických stromů [Prices of Biofuels and Related Commodities: an Analysis Using Methods of Minimum Span," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(2), pages 218-239.
    8. Andreas Löschel & Jiansuo Pei & Ran Wang & Bodo Sturm & Wolfgang Buchholz & Zhongxiu Zhao, 2021. "The Demand for Global and Local Environmental Protection: Experimental Evidence from Climate Change Mitigation in Beijing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 97(1), pages 137-154.
    9. Gabriela N. Tenea & Fabricio Veintimilla, 2021. "Potential Use of Native Yeasts to Produce Bioethanol and Other Byproducts from Black Sugarcane, an Alternative to Increment the Subsistence Farming in Northern Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Deepayan Debnath & Madhu Khanna & Deepak Rajagopal & David Zilberman, 2019. "The Future of Biofuels in an Electrifying Global Transportation Sector: Imperative, Prospects and Challenges," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 563-582, December.
    11. Baraldi, Piero & Podofillini, Luca & Mkrtchyan, Lusine & Zio, Enrico & Dang, Vinh N., 2015. "Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in Bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 176-193.
    12. Abas, Naeem & Kalair, Ali Raza & Khan, Nasrullah & Haider, Aun & Saleem, Zahid & Saleem, Muhammad Shoaib, 2018. "Natural and synthetic refrigerants, global warming: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 557-569.
    13. Patel, Leila & Graham, Lauren & Chowa, Gina, 2020. "Evidence of non-economic indicators as markers of success for youth in youth employability programs: Insights from a South African study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Peng Liu & Zhizhong Li, 2014. "Human Error Data Collection and Comparison with Predictions by SPAR‐H," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1706-1719, September.
    15. Qiao, Yidan & Zhang, Xian & Wang, Hanyu & Chen, Dengkai, 2024. "Dynamic assessment method for human factor risk of manned deep submergence operation system based on SPAR-H and SD," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Guo, Jin & Tanaka, Tetsuji, 2022. "Energy security versus food security: An analysis of fuel ethanol- related markets using the spillover index and partial wavelet coherence approaches," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Pandya, Dhruv & Podofillini, Luca & Emert, Frank & Lomax, Antony J. & Dang, Vinh N. & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2020. "Quantification of a human reliability analysis method for radiotherapy applications based on expert judgment aggregation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Luca Podofillini & Vinh Dang & Enrico Zio & Piero Baraldi & Massimo Librizzi, 2010. "Using Expert Models in Human Reliability Analysis—A Dependence Assessment Method Based on Fuzzy Logic," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(8), pages 1277-1297, August.
    19. Francis Declerck & Jean-Pierre Indjehagopian & Frédéric Lantz, 2020. "Dynamics of Biofuel Prices on the European Market : Impact of the EU Environmental policy on the resources markets," Working Papers hal-03193880, HAL.
    20. Ji, Qiang & Bouri, Elie & Roubaud, David & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2019. "Information interdependence among energy, cryptocurrency and major commodity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1042-1055.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:217:y:2022:i:c:s095183202100555x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.