IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v185y2019icp518-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Rachman, Andika
  • Ratnayake, R.M. Chandima

Abstract

Risk-based inspection (RBI) screening assessment is used to identify equipment that makes a significant contribution to the system's total risk of failure (RoF), so that the RBI detailed assessment can focus on analyzing higher-risk equipment. Due to its qualitative nature and high dependency on sound engineering judgment, screening assessment is vulnerable to human biases and errors, and thus subject to output variability and threatens the integrity of the assets. This paper attempts to tackle these challenges by utilizing a machine learning approach to conduct screening assessment. A case study using a dataset of RBI assessment for oil and gas production and processing units is provided, to illustrate the development of an intelligent system, based on a machine learning model for performing RBI screening assessment. The best performing model achieves accuracy and precision of 92.33% and 84.58%, respectively. A comparative analysis between the performance of the intelligent system and the conventional assessment is performed to examine the benefits of applying the machine learning approach in the RBI screening assessment. The result shows that the application of the machine learning approach potentially improves the quality of the conventional RBI screening assessment output by reducing output variability and increasing accuracy and precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachman, Andika & Ratnayake, R.M. Chandima, 2019. "Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 518-532.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:185:y:2019:i:c:p:518-532
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018301662
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bohdan W. Oppenheim, 2004. "Lean product development flow," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1.
    2. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique López & Soares, Rodrigo Ferreira & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2015. "A Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for determining efficient Risk-Based Inspection programs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 253-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Lu & Lu, Pan & Ren, Yihao, 2021. "A deep learning approach for imbalanced crash data in predicting highway-rail grade crossings accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Zhou, Xiaoyi & Lu, Pan & Zheng, Zijian & Tolliver, Denver & Keramati, Amin, 2020. "Accident Prediction Accuracy Assessment for Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Using Random Forest Algorithm Compared with Decision Tree," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Rabcan, Jan, 2023. "A new method for analysis of Multi-State systems based on Multi-valued decision diagram under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    6. Chen, Xi & Bose, Neil & Brito, Mario & Khan, Faisal & Thanyamanta, Bo & Zou, Ting, 2021. "A Review of Risk Analysis Research for the Operations of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre & Qazi, Abroon & Alalami, Mohammad Amjad & Ellahham, Samer & Ozonoff, Al, 2020. "Evaluation of patient safety culture using a random forest algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Salvatore Antonio Biancardo & Francesco Abbondati & Francesca Russo & Rosa Veropalumbo & Gianluca Dell’Acqua, 2020. "A Broad-Based Decision-Making Procedure for Runway Friction Decay Analysis in Maintenance Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avner Engel & Shalom Shachar, 2006. "Measuring and optimizing systems' quality costs and project duration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 259-280, September.
    2. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    3. Bohdan W. Oppenheim & Earll M. Murman & Deborah A. Secor, 2011. "Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 29-55, March.
    4. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Halil Ibrahim Cebeci & Shahryar Ghorbani & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "An Integrated Approach for Evaluating Lean Innovation Practices in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, October.
    5. A. M. M. Sharif Ullah & Jun'ichi Tamaki, 2011. "Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 154-172, June.
    6. Romulo B. Magnaye & Brian J. Sauser & Jose E. Ramirez‐Marquez, 2010. "System development planning using readiness levels in a cost of development minimization model," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 311-323, December.
    7. Francis Vanek & Peter Jackson & Richard Grzybowski, 2008. "Systems engineering metrics and applications in product development: A critical literature review and agenda for further research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 107-124, June.
    8. Aleksander Buczacki & Piotr Piątek, 2021. "Proposal for an Integrated Framework for Electronic Control Unit Design in the Automotive Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Syan, Chanan S. & Ramsoobag, Geeta, 2019. "Maintenance applications of multi-criteria optimization: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Tyagi, Satish & Cai, Xianming & Yang, Kai & Chambers, Terrence, 2015. "Lean tools and methods to support efficient knowledge creation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 204-214.
    11. Pombo, A. Vieira & Murta-Pina, João & Pires, V. Fernão, 2015. "Multiobjective planning of distribution networks incorporating switches and protective devices using a memetic optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 101-108.
    12. Compare, M. & Martini, F. & Zio, E., 2015. "Genetic algorithms for condition-based maintenance optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 611-623.
    13. Ghadir I. Siyam & David C. Wynn & P. John Clarkson, 2015. "Review of Value and Lean in Complex Product Development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 192-207, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:185:y:2019:i:c:p:518-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.