IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v14y2011i1p29-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Bohdan W. Oppenheim
  • Earll M. Murman
  • Deborah A. Secor

Abstract

Systems Engineering (SE) is regarded as a sound practice but not always delivered effectively, as documented in recent NASA, GAO, and DoD studies. Lean Thinking is the holistic work system credited for the extraordinary rise of Toyota to the most profitable and the largest auto company in the world. Lean Thinking has been successfully applied in other work fields such as general manufacturing, aerospace, healthcare, and service industries. The emerging field of Lean Systems Engineering (LSE) is the application of Lean principles, practices, and tools to SE and to the related aspects of enterprise management (EM) in order to enhance the delivery of value (which is defined as flawless delivery of product or mission with satisfaction of all stakeholders) while reducing waste. This paper contains four parts: (1) historical background of the new field of LSE and a review of the fundamental concepts of Lean Thinking; (2) the development process of a new product called “Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering”; (3) a list of the Enablers organized into six Lean principles; (4) summary and conclusions. The Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering is a comprehensive checklist of nonmandatory practices and recommendations formulated as “do's” and “don't's” of SE, and containing tacit knowledge (collective wisdom) on how to prepare for, plan, execute, and practice SE and EM using Lean Thinking. Each enabler has the potential to enhance program value and reduce waste. The Enablers are formulated as a web‐based addendum to the current SE Handbook published by the International Council for Systems Engineering (INCOSE), and do not repeat the practices made therein, which are regarded as sound. They should be an equally valuable addendum to other SE handbooks such as NASA, DoD, or company manuals. The enablers' development followed a classical process: Concept, Alpha, Beta, Prototype, and Version 1.0. This paper reports on Version 1.0 of the enablers, which are regarded as mature enough for dissemination, but which are intended to be a living online document to be continuously improved by interested practitioners as new knowledge and experience are acquired. The enablers were evaluated by surveys in the Beta and Prototype phases. The Prototype version has also been benchmarked with recent NASA and GAO studies. This project has been carried out by two core teams involving 14 volunteers from the LSE Working Group of INCOSE. The teams included representatives from industry, academia, and governments from United States, Israel, and the United Kingdom, with cooperation from the LSE Working Group membership at large. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 14: 29–55, 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Bohdan W. Oppenheim & Earll M. Murman & Deborah A. Secor, 2011. "Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 29-55, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:14:y:2011:i:1:p:29-55
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20161
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Earll Murman & Thomas Allen & Kirkor Bozdogan & Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld & Hugh McManus & Deborah Nightingale & Eric Rebentisch & Tom Shields & Fred Stahl & Myles Walton & Joyce Warmkessel & Stanley W, 2002. "Lean Enterprise Value," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-4039-0750-9, December.
    2. Bohdan W. Oppenheim, 2004. "Lean product development flow," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghadir I. Siyam & David C. Wynn & P. John Clarkson, 2015. "Review of Value and Lean in Complex Product Development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 192-207, March.
    2. Muhammad Shafiq & Adeel Akhtar & Muhammad Ismail & Muhammad Awais, 2021. "Lean Management Readiness Assessment Framework For Humanitarian Organizations Supply Chain Management," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 151-171.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avner Engel & Shalom Shachar, 2006. "Measuring and optimizing systems' quality costs and project duration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 259-280, September.
    2. Tyson R. Browning & Eric C. Honour, 2008. "Measuring the life‐cycle value of enduring systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 187-202, September.
    3. Tan Ching Ng & Morteza Ghobakhloo, 2018. "What Determines Lean Manufacturing Implementation? A CB-SEM Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Halil Ibrahim Cebeci & Shahryar Ghorbani & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "An Integrated Approach for Evaluating Lean Innovation Practices in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Carol Ann McDevitt & Eric C Cahill & Craig Stambaugh, 2004. "System‐level application of the evolutionary product development process to manufactured goods," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 144-152.
    6. A. M. M. Sharif Ullah & Jun'ichi Tamaki, 2011. "Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 154-172, June.
    7. Romulo B. Magnaye & Brian J. Sauser & Jose E. Ramirez‐Marquez, 2010. "System development planning using readiness levels in a cost of development minimization model," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 311-323, December.
    8. Samantha M. Brainard & Zoe Szajnfarber, 2019. "How government oversight adds time to contractor engineering work," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 54-65, January.
    9. Francis Vanek & Peter Jackson & Richard Grzybowski, 2008. "Systems engineering metrics and applications in product development: A critical literature review and agenda for further research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 107-124, June.
    10. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    11. Aaron A Tucker & Cihan H Dagli, 2009. "Design of experiments as a means of lean value delivery to the flight test enterprise," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 201-217, September.
    12. Aleksander Buczacki & Piotr Piątek, 2021. "Proposal for an Integrated Framework for Electronic Control Unit Design in the Automotive Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel, 2003. "Lean Transformation in the U.S. Aerospace Industry: Appreciating Interdependent Social and Technical Systems," Working papers 4299-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    14. Tyagi, Satish & Cai, Xianming & Yang, Kai & Chambers, Terrence, 2015. "Lean tools and methods to support efficient knowledge creation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 204-214.
    15. Rachman, Andika & Ratnayake, R.M. Chandima, 2019. "Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 518-532.
    16. Tyson R. Browning, 2003. "On customer value and improvement in product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 49-61.
    17. Ghadir I. Siyam & David C. Wynn & P. John Clarkson, 2015. "Review of Value and Lean in Complex Product Development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 192-207, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:14:y:2011:i:1:p:29-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.