IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v253y2025ics095183202400591x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient risk-based inspection framework: Balancing safety and budgetary constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Javid, Y.

Abstract

Efficient equipment maintenance is paramount across various industries to mitigate energy wastage and avert potential disasters such as hazardous emissions, fires, and explosions. Within this context, the adoption of risk-based inspection strategies has emerged as a crucial method for assessing equipment integrity. This study integrates the principles of Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) with a novel two-objective mathematical model, resulting in a comprehensive framework for equipment inspection programs. The primary aim of this framework is to reduce overall risk exposure while optimizing inspection expenditures. Unlike conventional approaches, this methodology eliminates the necessity to define threshold risk levels. By integrating inspection costs into the model, the assessment of Failure Consequences, and thereby, the decision-making process has been streamlined. This innovative algorithm effectively balances the reduction of failure likelihood with the minimization of inspection costs, enhancing decision-making capabilities. Importantly, this approach offers significant protection against energy wastage and the occurrence of leaks through robust risk management strategies. The algorithm employs specialized operators to expedite the discovery of optimal solutions. Empirical validation through a case study conducted at a Petrochemical Plant highlights the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Javid, Y., 2025. "Efficient risk-based inspection framework: Balancing safety and budgetary constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:253:y:2025:i:c:s095183202400591x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202400591X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chien, Chi-Hui & Chen, Chun-Hung & Chao, Yuh J., 2009. "A strategy for the risk-based inspection of pressure safety valves," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 810-818.
    2. Chiron, Marie & Genest, Christian & Morio, Jérôme & Dubreuil, Sylvain, 2023. "Failure probability estimation through high-dimensional elliptical distribution modeling with multiple importance sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Rezende, Filipe A. & Videiro, Paulo M. & Sagrilo, Luis V.S. & Oliveira, Mauro C., 2024. "Reliability-based fatigue inspection planning for mooring chains of floating systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Zhang, Wei-Heng & Qin, Jianjun & Lu, Da-Gang & Liu, Min & Faber, Michael H., 2023. "Quantification of the value of condition monitoring system with time-varying monitoring performance in the context of risk-based inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Rusin, Andrzej & Wojaczek, Adam, 2019. "Improving the availability and lengthening the life of power unit elements through the use of risk-based maintenance planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 28-35.
    6. Guo, Chunhui & Liang, Zhenglin, 2022. "A predictive Markov decision process for optimizing inspection and maintenance strategies of partially observable multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Kallen, M.J. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2005. "Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 177-185.
    8. Morato, P.G. & Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Rigo, P., 2023. "Inference and dynamic decision-making for deteriorating systems with probabilistic dependencies through Bayesian networks and deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E. & Laakso, T., 2016. "Risk-based optimization of pipe inspections in large underground networks with imprecise information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 228-238.
    10. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique López & Soares, Rodrigo Ferreira & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2015. "A Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for determining efficient Risk-Based Inspection programs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 253-265.
    11. Rachman, Andika & Ratnayake, R.M. Chandima, 2019. "Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 518-532.
    12. Peiravi, Abdossaber & Ardakan, Mostafa Abouei & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "A new Markov-based model for reliability optimization problems with mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing, Qi & Yu, Lin & Lan, Fengyi & Li, Yuntao, 2024. "Quantitative assessment rules and models for dynamic disaster risk in high-density gas gathering stations: Practical application in a largest CBM gathering station," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    2. Campari, Alessandro & Ustolin, Federico & Alvaro, Antonio & Paltrinieri, Nicola, 2024. "Inspection of hydrogen transport equipment: A data-driven approach to predict fatigue degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. Syan, Chanan S. & Ramsoobag, Geeta, 2019. "Maintenance applications of multi-criteria optimization: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Chen, Thomas Ying-Jeh & Riley, Connor Thomas & Van Hentenryck, Pascal & Guikema, Seth David, 2020. "Optimizing inspection routes in pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Arcieri, Giacomo & Hoelzl, Cyprien & Schwery, Oliver & Straub, Daniel & Papakonstantinou, Konstantinos G. & Chatzi, Eleni, 2023. "Bridging POMDPs and Bayesian decision making for robust maintenance planning under model uncertainty: An application to railway systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Wang, Chaonan & Wang, Xiaolei & Xing, Liudong & Guan, Quanlong & Yang, Chunhui & Yu, Min, 2021. "A Fast and Accurate Reliability Approximation Method for Heterogeneous Cold Standby Sparing Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Ling, Chunyan & Yang, Lechang & Feng, Kaixuan & Kuo, Way, 2023. "Survival signature based robust redundancy allocation under imprecise probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Nguyen, Phong T.T. & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification in low-probability response estimation using sliced inverse regression and polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    11. Peiravi, Abdossaber & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi, 2022. "Universal redundancy strategy for system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Liu, Xingheng & Matias, José & Jäschke, Johannes & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Gibbs sampler for noisy Transformed Gamma process: Inference and remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Marlow, David R. & Beale, David J. & Mashford, John S., 2012. "Risk-based prioritization and its application to inspection of valves in the water sector," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 67-74.
    14. Bragatto, Paolo A. & Pittiglio, Paolo & Ansaldi, Silvia, 2009. "The management of mechanical integrity inspections at small-sized “Seveso†facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 412-417.
    15. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    16. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2024. "Preventive maintenance for the constrained multi-attempt minimal repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Zhong, Yuanfu & Ren, Kezhou & Zhang, Yingchao, 2024. "Deep reinforcement learning-based resilience enhancement strategy of unmanned weapon system-of-systems under inevitable interferences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. M D Pandey & T Cheng & J A M van der Weide, 2011. "Finite-time maintenance cost analysis of engineering systems affected by stochastic degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 241-250, June.
    19. Li, Shuai & Chi, Xuefen & Yu, Baozhu, 2022. "An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for the reliability–redundancy allocation problem with global reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    20. Wang, Changxi & Elsayed, Elsayed A., 2020. "Stochastic modeling of corrosion growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:253:y:2025:i:c:s095183202400591x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.