IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2024i1p50-d1554213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Autonomous Multi-UAV Path Planning for Inspection Missions: A Comparative Study of Genetic and Stochastic Hill Climbing Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Faten Aljalaud

    (Computer Science Department, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
    Computer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yousef Alohali

    (Computer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Efficient path planning is vital for multi-UAV inspection missions, yet the comparative effectiveness of different optimization strategies has not received much attention. This paper introduces the first application of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Hill Climbing (HC) to multi-UAV inspection of indoor pipelines, providing a unique comparative analysis. GA exemplifies the global search strategy, while HC illustrates an enhanced stochastic local search. This comparison is impactful as it highlights the trade-offs between exploration and exploitation—two key challenges in multi-UAV path optimization. It also addresses practical concerns such as workload balancing and energy efficiency, which are crucial for the successful implementation of UAV missions. To tackle common challenges in multi-UAV operations, we have developed a novel repair mechanism. This mechanism utilizes problem-specific repair heuristics to ensure feasible and valid solutions by resolving redundant or missed inspection points. Additionally, we have introduced a penalty-based approach in HC to balance UAV workloads. Using the Crazyswarm simulation platform, we evaluated GA and HC across key performance metrics: energy consumption, travel distance, running time, and maximum tour length. The results demonstrate that GA achieves a 22% reduction in travel distance and a 23% reduction in energy consumption compared to HC, which often converges to suboptimal solutions. Additionally, GA outperforms HC, Greedy, and Random strategies, delivering at least a 13% improvement in workload balancing and other metrics. These findings establish a novel and impactful benchmark for comparing global and local optimization strategies in multi-UAV tasks, offering researchers and practitioners critical insights for selecting efficient and sustainable approaches to UAV operations in complex inspection environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Faten Aljalaud & Yousef Alohali, 2024. "Optimizing Autonomous Multi-UAV Path Planning for Inspection Missions: A Comparative Study of Genetic and Stochastic Hill Climbing Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:50-:d:1554213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faten Aljalaud & Heba Kurdi & Kamal Youcef-Toumi, 2023. "Autonomous Multi-UAV Path Planning in Pipe Inspection Missions Based on Booby Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique López & Soares, Rodrigo Ferreira & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2015. "A Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for determining efficient Risk-Based Inspection programs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 253-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    2. Syan, Chanan S. & Ramsoobag, Geeta, 2019. "Maintenance applications of multi-criteria optimization: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Jiayi Xu & Mario Di Nardo & Shi Yin, 2024. "Improved Swarm Intelligence-Based Logistics Distribution Optimizer: Decision Support for Multimodal Transportation of Cross-Border E-Commerce," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Pombo, A. Vieira & Murta-Pina, João & Pires, V. Fernão, 2015. "Multiobjective planning of distribution networks incorporating switches and protective devices using a memetic optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 101-108.
    5. Compare, M. & Martini, F. & Zio, E., 2015. "Genetic algorithms for condition-based maintenance optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 611-623.
    6. Rachman, Andika & Ratnayake, R.M. Chandima, 2019. "Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 518-532.
    7. Chuanyue Wang & Lei Zhang & Yifan Gao & Xiaoyuan Zheng & Qianling Wang, 2023. "A Cooperative Game Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Applied to UAV Inspection Path Planning in Urban Pipe Corridors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:50-:d:1554213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.