IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v53y2009i9p513-528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Basic petrochemicals from natural gas, coal and biomass: Energy use and CO2 emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Tao
  • Patel, Martin K.

Abstract

While high-value basic petrochemicals (HVCs) are mostly produced through conventional naphtha and ethane-based process routes, it is also possible to produce them through coal and biomass-based routes. In this paper, we compared these routes in terms of energy use and CO2 emissions per ton of HVCs. (The term ton and abbreviation t should be read in this paper as a metric ton or 1000kg.) Within the cradle-to-grave system boundary, we found the following:•The total energy use of the conventional routes is the lowest (about 60GJ/t HVCs, of which 50GJ is the calorific value of HVCs) whereas that of the methane-based routes is 30% higher, and that of the coal and biomass-based routes is about 60–150% higher.•The total CO2 emissions of conventional and methane-based routes are about 4–5tons CO2/t HVCs whereas those from the biomass-based routes range from 2tons CO2/t HVCs (a maize-based ethanol related route) to 4tons CO2 avoided per ton HVCs (a lignocellulosic biomass-based Fischer–Tropsch route). Avoided CO2 emissions are due to electricity co-generation. The total CO2 emissions of coal-based routes are by far the highest (8–11tons CO2/t HVCs). An exception is a coal-based route with CO2 capture and sequestration features, for which CO2 emissions are similar to those of the conventional routes. It is technically possible to add CO2 capture and sequestration features to any of the routes mentioned above.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Tao & Patel, Martin K., 2009. "Basic petrochemicals from natural gas, coal and biomass: Energy use and CO2 emissions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 513-528.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:513-528
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909000603
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delucchi, Mark A., 2003. "Appendix Z: References to the Main Report: An Appendix to the Report, “A Lifecycle Emissions Model (LEM): Lifecycle Emissions From Transportation Fuels, Motor Vehicles, Transportation Modes, Electrici," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8m39k1fp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211.
    3. Ogden, Joan M. & Williams, Robert H. & Larson, Eric D., 2004. "Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 7-27, January.
    4. Gielen, D. J. & Yagita, H., 2002. "The long-term impact of GHG reduction policies on global trade: A case study for the petrochemical industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 665-681, June.
    5. Ren, Tao & Patel, Martin & Blok, Kornelis, 2006. "Olefins from conventional and heavy feedstocks: Energy use in steam cracking and alternative processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 425-451.
    6. Ren, Tao & Patel, Martin K. & Blok, Kornelis, 2008. "Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy use, CO2 emissions and production costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 817-833.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Keren & Qammar, Rabia & Quddus, Abdul & Lyu, Ning & Alnafrah, Ibrahim, 2024. "Interlinking dynamics of natural resources, financial development, industrialization, and energy intensity: Implications for natural resources policy in emerging seven countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Mooktzeng Lim & Ee Sann Tan, 2023. "Techno-Economic Feasibility Study for Organic and Plastic Waste Pyrolysis Pilot Plant in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Zahra Gholami & Fatemeh Gholami & Zdeněk Tišler & Mohammadtaghi Vakili, 2021. "A Review on the Production of Light Olefins Using Steam Cracking of Hydrocarbons," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Ren, Tao & Daniëls, Bert & Patel, Martin K. & Blok, Kornelis, 2009. "Petrochemicals from oil, natural gas, coal and biomass: Production costs in 2030–2050," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 653-663.
    5. Taisuke Umesaki & Shoki Kosai & Shunsuke Kashiwakura & Eiji Yamasue, 2024. "Resource Intensity Analysis of Producing 21 Types of Plastic in Terms of Mining Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Tao & Daniëls, Bert & Patel, Martin K. & Blok, Kornelis, 2009. "Petrochemicals from oil, natural gas, coal and biomass: Production costs in 2030–2050," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 653-663.
    2. Oskar Lecuyer & Adrien Vogt-Schilb, 2013. "Assessing and ordering investments in polluting fossil-fueled and zero-carbon capital," CIRED Working Papers hal-00850680, HAL.
    3. Talaei, Alireza & Ahiduzzaman, Md. & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "Assessment of long-term energy efficiency improvement and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potentials in the chemical sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 231-247.
    4. Xu, Zhongming & Fang, Chenhao & Ma, Tieju, 2020. "Analysis of China’s olefin industry using a system optimization model considering technological learning and energy consumption reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Rebekka Volk & Christoph Stallkamp & Justus J. Steins & Savina Padumane Yogish & Richard C. Müller & Dieter Stapf & Frank Schultmann, 2021. "Techno‐economic assessment and comparison of different plastic recycling pathways: A German case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1318-1337, October.
    6. Jalid, Fatima & Khan, Tuhin Suvra & Haider, M. Ali, 2021. "Exploring bimetallic alloy catalysts of Co, Pd and Cu for CO2 reduction combined with ethane dehydrogenation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Sofia Russo & Alicia Valero & Antonio Valero & Marta Iglesias-Émbil, 2021. "Exergy-Based Assessment of Polymers Production and Recycling: An Application to the Automotive Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Borba, Bruno S.M.C. & Lucena, André F.P. & Rathmann, Régis & Costa, Isabella V.L. & Nogueira, Larissa P.P. & Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Castelo Branco, David A. & Júnior, Mauricio F.H. & Szklo, Alexandre &, 2012. "Energy-related climate change mitigation in Brazil: Potential, abatement costs and associated policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 430-441.
    9. Lechtenböhmer, Stefan & Nilsson, Lars J. & Åhman, Max & Schneider, Clemens, 2016. "Decarbonising the energy intensive basic materials industry through electrification – Implications for future EU electricity demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1623-1631.
    10. repec:hal:journl:hal-00850680 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2014. "Has Medical Innovation Reduced Cancer Mortality?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 60(1), pages 135-177.
    12. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    13. Cowling, Marc & Ughetto, Elisa & Lee, Neil, 2018. "The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 166-176.
    14. Alhassan Abdul-Wakeel Karakara & Evans Osabuohien, 2020. "ICT adoption, competition and innovation of informal firms in West Africa: a comparative study of Ghana and Nigeria," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 397-414, June.
    15. Bharat Diwakar & Gilad Sorek, 2016. "Dynamics of Human Capital Accumulation, IPR Policy, and Growth," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2016-11, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    16. Dana Benešová & Miroslav Hušek, 2019. "Factors for efficient use of information and communication technologies influencing sustainable position of service enterprises in Slovakia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1182-1194, March.
    17. Marina Rybalka, 2015. "The innovative input mix. Assessing the importance of R&D and ICT investments for firm performance in manufacturing and services," Discussion Papers 801, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    18. ManYing Kang & Marcel Ausloos, 2017. "An Inverse Problem Study: Credit Risk Ratings as a Determinant of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Xuebing Tang, 2012. "The Assessment on Environmental Value of Thermal Power in China," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 115-120, March.
    20. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    21. Galasso, Alberto & Schankerman, Mark, 2013. "Patents and Cumulative Innovation:Causal Evidence from the Courts," IIR Working Paper 13-16, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:513-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.