IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v104y2015ipap213-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Baydar, G.
  • Ciliz, N.
  • Mammadov, A.

Abstract

Cotton textile and clothing industry is a complex and multi-tiered system that consists of cotton cultivation and harvesting, fiber production, yarn manufacturing, fabric preparation, fabric processing that includes bleaching and dying sub-processes among others and fabrication of the final product. An array of environmental concerns are associated with this sector, the most significant of which are issues related to use of agrochemicals in the cultivation of cotton and water, energy and chemical consumption in the fabric processing stage. Textile industry is a significant contributor to the Turkish economy constituting 18% of total export volume in 2013 according to Turkish Statistical Institute. In the study, environmental impacts of Eco T-shirts produced from organically grown cotton and processed with green dyeing recipe were compared to that of conventional T-shirts, in terms of their contributions to global warming, acidification, aquatic and terrestrial eutrophication and photochemical ozone formation using life cycle assessment methodology. The results reveal that Eco T-shirts have lower impact potentials across all inspected categories, with the most dramatic reduction in aquatic eutrophication potential (up to 97%) due to elimination of nitrogen and phosphorus containing chemical based fertilizers. The results also show that global warming potential is by far the largest environmental impact for both conventional and Eco T-shirts with the main impact coming from use phase, followed by cultivation and harvesting and fabric processing phases. The results of the analysis underline the importance of utilizing sustainable raw materials in all life cycle stages of cotton textile products and the necessity of focusing on the consumer behavior and sustainable practices in the use phase of the products as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Baydar, G. & Ciliz, N. & Mammadov, A., 2015. "Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 213-223.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:104:y:2015:i:pa:p:213-223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300677
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salem Y. Lakhal & Hamadoun Sidibe & Souad H'Mida, 2008. "Comparing conventional and certified organic cotton supply chains: the case of Mali," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 243-255.
    2. Woolridge, Anne C. & Ward, Garth D. & Phillips, Paul S. & Collins, Michael & Gandy, Simon, 2006. "Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 94-103.
    3. Mrill Ingram, 2002. "Producing the natural fiber naturally: Technological change and the US organic cotton industry," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 19(4), pages 325-336, December.
    4. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Akcaoz, Handan & Ozkan, Burhan, 2005. "An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 145-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuang Chen & Fangli Chen & Lisha Zhu & Qizheng Li & Xiaopeng Wang & Laili Wang, 2023. "A Spatial Water Footprint Assessment of Recycled Cotton T-Shirts: Case of Local Impacts in Selected China Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Victoria Gonzalez & Xingqiu Lou & Ting Chi, 2023. "Evaluating Environmental Impact of Natural and Synthetic Fibers: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Shi, Lei & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2017. "Improving corporate sustainable development by using an interdependent closed-loop hierarchical structure," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 24-35.
    4. Toshiro Semba & Ryuzo Furukawa & Norihiro Itsubo, 2024. "Carbon Footprint for Jeans’ Circular Economy Model Using Bagasse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. & de la Guardia, M., 2017. "Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 107-115.
    7. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salim Almaliki & Nasim Monjezi, 2021. "Using new computer based techniques to optimise energy consumption in agricultural land levelling," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 149-163.
    2. Pahlavan, Reza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2011. "Energy use efficiency in greenhouse tomato production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6714-6719.
    3. Mutu Tantrige Osada Vishvajith Peiris & Gileemalege Lalithri Navodya Dayarathne, 2023. "Application of Life Cycle Framework for Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Circular Economy Perspective from Developing Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 899-918, June.
    4. Ghatrehsamani, Shirin & Ebrahimi, Rahim & Kazi, Salim Newaz & Badarudin Badry, Ahmad & Sadeghinezhad, Emad, 2016. "Optimization model of peach production relevant to input energies – Yield function in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 315-321.
    5. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    6. Caroline Ignell & Peter Davies & Cecilia Lundholm, 2013. "Swedish Upper Secondary School Students’ Conceptions of Negative Environmental Impact and Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Manda, B. M. Krishna & Worrell, Ernst & Patel, Martin K., 2015. "Prospective life cycle assessment of an antibacterial T-shirt and supporting business decisions to create value," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 47-57.
    8. Kaur, Navneet & Vashist, Krishan Kumar & Brar, A.S., 2021. "Energy and productivity analysis of maize based crop sequences compared to rice-wheat system under different moisture regimes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Unakıtan, Gökhan & Aydın, Başak, 2018. "A comparison of energy use efficiency and economic analysis of wheat and sunflower production in Turkey: A case study in Thrace Region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 279-285.
    10. Yaolin Wang & Chenyang Liu & Xi Zhang & Shaoting Zeng, 2023. "Research on Sustainable Furniture Design Based on Waste Textiles Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Jéssica Bárbara da Silva & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & João Gabriel Távora Pedrosa & Aldo Torres Sales & Everardo Valadares de Sa Barretto Sampaio & Rômulo Simões Cezar Menezes & Emmanuel Damilano, 2022. "Energetic and Economic Analysis of Spineless Cactus Biomass Production in the Brazilian Semi-arid Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Muhammad AKBAR & Abdul JABBAR, 2017. "Impact of macroeconomic policies on national food security in Pakistan: simulation analyses under a simultaneous equations framework," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(10), pages 471-488.
    13. Chandel, Rupinder & Raj, Ritu & Kaur, Arpandeep & Singh, Kuldeep & Kataria, Sanjeev Kumar, 2024. "Energy and yield optimization of field and vegetable crops in heavy crop residue for Indian conditions-climate smart techniques for food security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    14. Ozkan, Burhan & Ceylan, R. Figen & Kizilay, Hatice, 2011. "Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1639-1644.
    15. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Keyhani, Alireza & Mostofi-Sarkari, Mohammad Reza & Jafari, Ali, 2012. "Energy and economic analysis of different seed corn harvesting systems in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 469-476.
    16. Sara Ilahi & Yongchang Wu & Muhammad Ahsan Ali Raza & Wenshan Wei & Muhammad Imran & Lyankhua Bayasgalankhuu, 2019. "Optimization Approach for Improving Energy Efficiency and Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emission of Wheat Crop using Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Pritpal Singh & Gurdeep Singh & G. P. S. Sodhi, 2022. "Data envelopment analysis based optimization for improving net ecosystem carbon and energy budget in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivation: methods and a case study of north-western India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2079-2119, February.
    18. Bozoğlu, Mehmet & Ceyhan, Vedat, 2009. "Energy conversion efficiency of trout and sea bass production in the Black Sea, Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 199-204.
    19. Iosvany López-Sandin & Guadalupe Gutiérrez-Soto & Adriana Gutiérrez-Díez & Nancy Medina-Herrera & Edgar Gutiérrez-Castorena & Francisco Zavala-García, 2019. "Evaluation of the Use of Energy in the Production of Sweet Sorghum ( Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench) under Different Production Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Patrick Grüning & Justina Banionienė & Lina Dagilienė & Michael Donadelli & Marcus Jüppner & Renatas Kizys & Kai Lessmann, 2021. "The Quadrilemma of a Small Open Circular Economy Through a Prism of the 9R Strategies," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 96, Bank of Lithuania.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:104:y:2015:i:pa:p:213-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.