IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7670-d1141177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Environmental Impact of Natural and Synthetic Fibers: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Gonzalez

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

  • Xingqiu Lou

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

  • Ting Chi

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the environmental impact of six fibers in the textile industry: conventional and organic cotton, silk, jute, flax, and polyester. The study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology with a cradle-to-gate system boundary and analyzed the stages of agriculture, spinning, weaving, and dyeing. In agriculture production, five impact categories (i.e., fossil resource scarcity, global warming, land use, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and water consumption) have the most significant differences across these fibers. Polyester production significantly impacted the terrestrial ecotoxicity impact category, while stratospheric ozone depletion had a minor impact. In yarn preparation and spinning, silk has the most significant impact in most categories, followed by conventional cotton, while jute had the most minimal impact. In weaving, the most visible differences were in fossil resource scarcity, global warming, land use, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and water consumption. Conventional cotton dyeing showed significant impacts on global warming potential and terrestrial ecotoxicity. This study contributes to the limited literature on existing LCA research in the textile industry. Adding updated information will help increase the comprehension of LCA research and guide stakeholders in transitioning fashion supply chains more sustainably.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Gonzalez & Xingqiu Lou & Ting Chi, 2023. "Evaluating Environmental Impact of Natural and Synthetic Fibers: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7670-:d:1141177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Mara Bortoloto Damasceno Barcelos & Rodrigo Salvador & Maria da Graça Guedes & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2020. "Opportunities for Improving the Environmental Profile of Silk Cocoon Production under Brazilian Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Yelin Deng & Yajun Tian, 2015. "Assessing the Environmental Impact of Flax Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite from a Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Baydar, G. & Ciliz, N. & Mammadov, A., 2015. "Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 213-223.
    4. Mrill Ingram, 2002. "Producing the natural fiber naturally: Technological change and the US organic cotton industry," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 19(4), pages 325-336, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Isabella Bianco & Alice De Bona & Mariachiara Zanetti & Deborah Panepinto, 2023. "Environmental Impacts in the Textile Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of a Woolen Undershirt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Ting Chi & Victoria Gonzalez & Justin Janke & Mya Phan & Weronika Wojdyla, 2023. "Unveiling the Soaring Trend of Fashion Rental Services: A U.S. Consumer Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Andi Mehmeti & Ahmed Abdelwahab M. Abdelhafez & Pierre Ellssel & Mladen Todorovic & Generosa Calabrese, 2024. "Performance and Sustainability of Organic and Conventional Cotton Farming Systems in Egypt: An Environmental and Energy Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Amiri, Hamid & Lam, Su Shiung & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of bioenergy systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Nicole Bamber & Ian Turner & Baishali Dutta & Mohammed Davoud Heidari & Nathan Pelletier, 2023. "Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Grain and Oilseed Crops: Review and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Shuang Chen & Fangli Chen & Lisha Zhu & Qizheng Li & Xiaopeng Wang & Laili Wang, 2023. "A Spatial Water Footprint Assessment of Recycled Cotton T-Shirts: Case of Local Impacts in Selected China Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. & de la Guardia, M., 2017. "Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 107-115.
    7. Toshiro Semba & Ryuzo Furukawa & Norihiro Itsubo, 2024. "Carbon Footprint for Jeans’ Circular Economy Model Using Bagasse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. R. R. L. (Rick) van Loon & Ester Pujadas-Gispert & S. P. G. (Faas) Moonen & Rijk Blok, 2019. "Environmental Optimization of Precast Concrete Beams Using Fibre Reinforced Polymers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Roberto Aguado & Francesc Xavier Espinach & Fabiola Vilaseca & Quim Tarrés & Pere Mutjé & Marc Delgado-Aguilar, 2022. "Approaching a Zero-Waste Strategy in Rapeseed ( Brassica napus ) Exploitation: Sustainably Approaching Bio-Based Polyethylene Composites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Baydar, G. & Ciliz, N. & Mammadov, A., 2015. "Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 213-223.
    11. Shi, Lei & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2017. "Improving corporate sustainable development by using an interdependent closed-loop hierarchical structure," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 24-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7670-:d:1141177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.