IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v36y2011i5p1639-1644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production

Author

Listed:
  • Ozkan, Burhan
  • Ceylan, R. Figen
  • Kizilay, Hatice

Abstract

The study examines energy use patterns and the relationship between energy inputs and yield for double crop (fall and summer) glasshouse tomato production in Antalya province, where is one of the most important greenhouse centres in Turkey. The data of the study was retrieved from 37 fall and 25 summer glasshouse tomato producers via face to face survey in 2007. The research findings revealed energy use values for inputs such as manure, electricity, chemical fertilizer and fuel. While the average yield per hectare is 25025.4 kg for enterprises involved in tomato production in fall, it is 22392.9 kg for summer production. The overall energy consumption is higher in fall production with 81362.2 MJ ha−1 in comparison to summer production 63023.2 MJ ha−1. In addition, the specific energy requirement is 3521.2 MJ t−1 and 2814.4 MJ t−1 for fall and summer production in order and the energy efficiency was found out to be 0.31 kg MJ−1 and 0.36 kg MJ−1 respectively. Finally, the energy relationship was tested using the production relationship. The findings indicated that direct energy sources are effective in tomato yield for both of the two seasons. More clearly, the most significant energy input was electrical energy for summer production and a combination of electrical energy, human power and machinery for fall production. Yet, excess and unconscious use of chemical ingredients in glasshouse tomato production was confirmed as energy derived from chemical drugs leaded a declination in the yield for fall season. Therefore, the paper revealed energy relationship for double crop glasshouse tomato production in Antalya, being a reference for similar production methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozkan, Burhan & Ceylan, R. Figen & Kizilay, Hatice, 2011. "Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1639-1644.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:1639-1644
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148110005355
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozkan, Burhan & Akcaoz, Handan & Fert, Cemal, 2004. "Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 39-51.
    2. Hatirli, Selim Adem & Ozkan, Burhan & Fert, Cemal, 2006. "Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 427-438.
    3. Tzilivakis, J. & Warner, D.J. & May, M. & Lewis, K.A. & Jaggard, K., 2005. "An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 101-119, August.
    4. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Akcaoz, Handan & Ozkan, Burhan, 2005. "An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 145-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raveena Kargwal & Yadvika & Vijay Kumar Singh & Anil Kumar, 2023. "Energy Use Patterns of Pearl Millet ( Pennisetumglaucum (L.)) Production in Haryana, India," World, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Elsoragaby, Suha & Yahya, Azmi & Mahadi, Muhammad Razif & Nawi, Nazmi Mat & Mairghany, Modather, 2019. "Energy utilization in major crop cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1285-1303.
    3. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza, 2012. "Energy consumption flow and econometric models of two plum cultivars productions in Tehran province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 211-216.
    4. Rana Shahzad Noor & Fiaz Hussain & Muhammad Umair & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Abu Saad & Yong Sun, 2020. "Silage Corn Production Under Different Planting Methods In Rainfed Agriculture System: An Energy Analysis," Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 32-35:2, August.
    5. Ghatrehsamani, Shirin & Ebrahimi, Rahim & Kazi, Salim Newaz & Badarudin Badry, Ahmad & Sadeghinezhad, Emad, 2016. "Optimization model of peach production relevant to input energies – Yield function in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 315-321.
    6. Soltanali, Hamzeh & Nikkhah, Amin & Rohani, Abbas, 2017. "Energy audit of Iranian kiwifruit production using intelligent systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 646-654.
    7. Muazu, A. & Yahya, A. & Ishak, W.I.W. & Khairunniza-Bejo, S., 2015. "Energy audit for sustainable wetland paddy cultivation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 182-191.
    8. Kuswardhani, Nita & Soni, Peeyush & Shivakoti, Ganesh P., 2013. "Comparative energy input–output and financial analyses of greenhouse and open field vegetables production in West Java, Indonesia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 83-92.
    9. Mohammadshirazi, Ahmad & Akram, Asadolah & Rafiee, Shahin & Mousavi Avval, Seyyed Hashem & Bagheri Kalhor, Elnaz, 2012. "An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield in tangerine production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4515-4521.
    10. Naseri, Hakim & Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami & Ranjbar, Iraj & Zamani, Davood Mohammad, 2021. "Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Yano, Akira & Cossu, Marco, 2019. "Energy sustainable greenhouse crop cultivation using photovoltaic technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 116-137.
    12. Hossein Jargan & Abbas Rohani & Armaghan Kosari-Moghaddam, 2022. "Application of modeling techniques for energy analysis of fruit production systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2616-2639, February.
    13. Taheri-Rad, Alireza & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Rohani, Abbas & Khoramdel, Surur & Nikkhah, Amin, 2017. "Energy flow modeling and predicting the yield of Iranian paddy cultivars using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 405-412.
    14. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 7-12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Keyhani, Alireza & Mostofi-Sarkari, Mohammad Reza & Jafari, Ali, 2012. "Energy and economic analysis of different seed corn harvesting systems in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 469-476.
    2. Hafeez, Mohsin & Bundschuh, Jochen & Mushtaq, Shahbaz, 2014. "Exploring synergies and tradeoffs: Energy, water, and economic implications of water reuse in rice-based irrigation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 889-900.
    3. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 7-12.
    4. Kizilaslan, Halil, 2009. "Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1354-1358, July.
    5. Ozkan, Burhan & Ceylan, R. Figen & Kizilay, Hatice, 2011. "Energy inputs and crop yield relationships in greenhouse winter crop tomato production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3217-3221.
    6. Mushtaq, Shahbaz & Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Maroulis, Jerry & Hafeez, Mohsin, 2009. "Energy and water tradeoffs in enhancing food security: A selective international assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3635-3644, September.
    7. Beheshti Tabar, Iman & Keyhani, Alireza & Rafiee, Shaheen, 2010. "Energy balance in Iran's agronomy (1990-2006)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 849-855, February.
    8. Rajabi Hamedani, Sara & Keyhani, Alireza & Alimardani, Reza, 2011. "Energy use patterns and econometric models of grape production in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6345-6351.
    9. R. Fadavi & A. Keyhani & S.S. Mohtasebi, 2011. "An analysis of energy use, input costs and relation between energy inputs and yield of apple orchard," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 88-96.
    10. Pahlavan, Reza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2011. "Energy use efficiency in greenhouse tomato production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6714-6719.
    11. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.
    12. Ghatrehsamani, Shirin & Ebrahimi, Rahim & Kazi, Salim Newaz & Badarudin Badry, Ahmad & Sadeghinezhad, Emad, 2016. "Optimization model of peach production relevant to input energies – Yield function in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 315-321.
    13. Unakıtan, Gökhan & Aydın, Başak, 2018. "A comparison of energy use efficiency and economic analysis of wheat and sunflower production in Turkey: A case study in Thrace Region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 279-285.
    14. Jackson, Tamara M. & Khan, Shahbaz & Hafeez, Mohsin, 2010. "A comparative analysis of water application and energy consumption at the irrigated field level," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1477-1485, October.
    15. Władysław Szempliński & Bogdan Dubis & Krzysztof Michał Lachutta & Krzysztof Józef Jankowski, 2021. "Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    16. Chandel, Rupinder & Raj, Ritu & Kaur, Arpandeep & Singh, Kuldeep & Kataria, Sanjeev Kumar, 2024. "Energy and yield optimization of field and vegetable crops in heavy crop residue for Indian conditions-climate smart techniques for food security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    17. Houshyar, Ehsan & Azadi, Hossein & Almassi, Morteza & Sheikh Davoodi, Mohammad Javad & Witlox, Frank, 2012. "Sustainable and efficient energy consumption of corn production in Southwest Iran: Combination of multi-fuzzy and DEA modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 672-681.
    18. Bozoğlu, Mehmet & Ceyhan, Vedat, 2009. "Energy conversion efficiency of trout and sea bass production in the Black Sea, Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 199-204.
    19. Kumar, Adarsh & Rana, K.S. & Choudhary, Anil K. & Bana, R.S. & Sharma, V.K. & Prasad, Shiv & Gupta, Gaurendra & Choudhary, Mukesh & Pradhan, Amaresh & Rajpoot, Sudhir K. & Kumar, Abhishek & Kumar, Ami, 2021. "Energy budgeting and carbon footprints of zero-tilled pigeonpea–wheat cropping system under sole or dual crop basis residue mulching and Zn-fertilization in a semi-arid agro-ecology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Burak Saltuk & Barbara Jagosz & Osman Gökdoğan & Roman Rolbiecki & Atılgan Atilgan & Stanisław Rolbiecki, 2022. "An Investigation on the Energy Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Orange Production in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:1639-1644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.