IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reacre/v25y2013i2p157-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The persistence of current and proposed measures of operating cash flow

Author

Listed:
  • Francis, Rick N.
  • Glandon, Sid
  • Olsen, Lori

Abstract

The measurement of operating cash flow using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) currently requires deductions for interest and income tax payments, and prohibits deductions for capital expenditures. In contrast, the IASB and the FASB are jointly proposing a new measure of operating cash flow which prohibits deductions for interest and income tax payments, and requires deductions for capital expenditures. This study compares the persistence of the current and proposed measures of operating cash flow, and the industry-specific results indicate that there is no significant difference between the persistence of the two measures for more than three-fourths of the industries in the sample. Moreover, the Boards’ constituents are recommending the use of a subtotal of operating cash flow prior to capital expenditures, and the results of this study suggest that this subtotal is more persistent for a limited number of industries than the current measure. Overall, the results of this study suggest that the predictive ability of operating cash flow will not change significantly for most industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis, Rick N. & Glandon, Sid & Olsen, Lori, 2013. "The persistence of current and proposed measures of operating cash flow," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 157-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:25:y:2013:i:2:p:157-168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2013.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045713000179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.racreg.2013.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bauman, Mark P. & Francis, Rick, 2008. "An examination of supplemental disclosure requirements for development stage enterprises," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 155-174.
    2. Schmalensee, Richard, 1985. "Do Markets Differ Much?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 341-351, June.
    3. Nelson, Karen K. & Barth, Mary E. & Cram, Donald, 2001. "Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows," Research Papers 1594r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Mintchik, Natalia, 2009. "The impact of SFAS No. 141 on earnings predictability of merging firms: Evidence from the initial year of implementation," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 89-99.
    5. C. Cheng & Dana Hollie, 2008. "Do core and non-core cash flows from operations persist differentially in predicting future cash flows?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 29-53, July.
    6. Mark E. Doms & Timothy Dunne, 1998. "Capital Adjustment Patterns in Manufacturing Plants," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(2), pages 409-429, April.
    7. Patricia M. Fairfield & Sundaresh Ramnath & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2009. "Do Industry‐Level Analyses Improve Forecasts of Financial Performance?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 147-178, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bauman, Mark P. & Shaw, Kenneth W., 2016. "Harmonizing pension accounting: Income statement effects of applying IAS19R to U.S. firms," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10.
    2. Nugroho, Dwiyanjana Santyo & Pertiwi, Meilani Intan, 2021. "Stock Price Reaction when Covid -19 Exist: Moderating by Firm’s Operating Cash Flow," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 55(1), pages 71-85.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Kent & Jacqueline Birt, 2021. "IAS 7 and value relevance: the direct method versus the indirect method," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1532-1586, December.
    2. De Andrés Fazio, Salvador & Urquía Grande, Elena & Pérez Estébanez, Raquel, 2022. "The “secret life” of the Statement of Cash Flow: A bibliometric analysis," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    3. Baljit K. Sidhu & CHUAN YU, 2021. "Direct Method Operating Cash Flow Disclosures: Determinants and Incremental Usefulness," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 421-467, September.
    4. Andrew B. Jackson & Marlene A. Plumlee & Brian R. Rountree, 2018. "Decomposing the market, industry, and firm components of profitability: implications for forecasts of profitability," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1071-1095, September.
    5. Amor-Tapia, Borja & Tascón Fernández, María T., 2014. "Estimation of future levels and changes in profitability: The effect of the relative position of the firm in its industry and the operating-financing disaggregation," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 30-46.
    6. Sompong Pornupatham & Hun-Tong Tan & Thanyaluk Vichitsarawong & G-Song Yoo, 2023. "The Effect of Cash Flow Presentation Method on Investors’ Forecast of Future Cash Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1877-1900, March.
    7. Elio Alfonso & Dana Hollie & Shaokun Carol Yu, 2019. "Cash Flow Restatements: Stock Market Reaction to Overstated versus Understated Restatements," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-1, August.
    8. Noury, Benjamin & Hammami, Helmi & Ousama, A.A. & Zeitun, Rami, 2020. "The prediction of future cash flows based on operating cash flows, earnings and accruals in the French context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    9. Demmer, Matthias, 2015. "Improving profitability forecasts with information on earnings quality," Discussion Papers 2015/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    10. Yang Pang & Shimeng Shi & Yukun Shi & Yang Zhao, 2022. "A nonlinear dynamic approach to cash flow forecasting," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 205-237, July.
    11. Brett W. Cantrell & Victoria Dickinson, 2020. "Conditional Life Cycle: An Examination of Operating Performance for Leaders and Laggards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 433-451, January.
    12. Monterrey Mayoral, Juan & Sánchez Segura, Amparo, 2017. "Una evaluación empírica de los métodos de predicción de la rentabilidad y su relación con las características corporativas," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 95-106.
    13. Jing Jia & Zhongtian Li, 2022. "Corporate sustainability, earnings persistence and the association between earnings and future cash flows," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 299-336, March.
    14. Farshadfar, Shadi & Monem, Reza, 2013. "Further Evidence on the Usefulness of Direct Method Cash Flow Components for Forecasting Future Cash Flows," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 111-133.
    15. Richard Anthony Kent & Di Bu, 2020. "The importance of cash flow disclosure and cost of capital," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 877-908, April.
    16. Pütter, Jonas, 2023. "Is Cash (the only) King? – Eine kritische Analyse der Aussagekraft von Kapitalflussrechnungen nach IAS 7 [Is Cash (the only) King? – A critical analysis of the relevance of Cashflow figures accordi," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(1), pages 219-236.
    17. Frederico Belo & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2010. "Cross-sectional Tobin's Q," NBER Working Papers 16336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Bradley Blaylock & Bradley P. Lawson & Michael A. Mayberry, 2020. "Taxable income, future profitability, and stock returns," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 858-881, July.
    19. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Boone, J., 2004. "Balance of Power," Other publications TiSEM d3f8cd4b-eaf0-4c1c-aed4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:25:y:2013:i:2:p:157-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-accounting-regulation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.