IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v262y2023ics0925527323001354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rearticulating supply chain design and operation principles to mitigate uncertainty in the Norwegian engineer-to-order shipbuilding sector

Author

Listed:
  • Alfnes, Erlend
  • Gosling, Jonathan
  • Naim, Mohamed
  • Dreyer, Heidi C.

Abstract

Engineering-to-order (ETO) systems are especially prone to high levels of uncertainty in demand, as well as from internal processes, supply side sources and their own control systems. Understanding and categorising the causes of uncertainty provides an opportunity for organisations to determine the principles and tactics for their mitigation. Previous scholars have developed a framework for ETO uncertainty reduction by the extension of the established ‘FORRIDGE’ principles from general manufacturing management. Although such a framework is claimed to be generic, it has only previously been applied in the UK construction industry. The aim of this paper is to determine—via a replication study—the reproducibility, reliability and validity of the ETO uncertainty reduction framework and extend it. A conceptual replication research study was undertaken involving a different population sample: the Norwegian shipbuilding sector. Based on previous research, we categorise ETO into two forms: innovate to order (ITO) and redesign to order (RTO). Targeting 10 Norwegian first-tier ship equipment manufacturers, the respondents were questioned regarding their sources of uncertainty and measures they adopted to mitigate these. Supply chain tactics for shipbuilding have been identified and mapped against the ETO uncertainty reduction principles and uncertainty sources for RTO and ITO types of ETO. Our study has highlighted the reliability of the FORRIDGE principles. We extend the original set of tactics established in the construction sector so that the ETO uncertainty reduction principles can be used in another sector, and we indicate the significance of different tactics for ITO and RTO types of ETO. We make a methodological contribution by showing the application of a conceptual replication research design in an operations management context. Further research is required to test the principles in other ETO-intensive sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfnes, Erlend & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed & Dreyer, Heidi C., 2023. "Rearticulating supply chain design and operation principles to mitigate uncertainty in the Norwegian engineer-to-order shipbuilding sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:262:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323001354
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323001354
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thanos E. Goltsos & Borja Ponte & Shixuan Wang & Ying Liu & Mohamed M. Naim & Aris A. Syntetos, 2019. "The boomerang returns? Accounting for the impact of uncertainties on the dynamics of remanufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(23), pages 7361-7394, December.
    2. Childerhouse, Paul & Towill, Denis R., 2003. "Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 17-27, February.
    3. Alfnes, Erlend & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed & Dreyer, Heidi C., 2021. "Exploring systemic factors creating uncertainty in complex engineer-to-order supply chains: Case studies from Norwegian shipbuilding first tier suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Sadikoglu, Esin & Zehir, Cemal, 2010. "Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 13-26, September.
    5. Geary, S. & Disney, S.M. & Towill, D.R., 2006. "On bullwhip in supply chains--historical review, present practice and expected future impact," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 2-18, May.
    6. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    7. Telles, Eduardo Santos & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Morandi, Maria Isabel Wolf Motta & Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori, 2020. "Drum-buffer-rope in an engineering-to-order system: An analysis of an aerospace manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Carl F. Rehn & Sigurd S. Pettersen & Jose J. Garcia & Per O. Brett & Stein O. Erikstad & Bjørn E. Asbjørnslett & Adam M. Ross & Donna H. Rhodes, 2019. "Quantification of changeability level for engineering systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 80-94, January.
    10. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Kaut, Michal & Wallace, Stein W., 2017. "The impact of design uncertainty in engineer-to-order project planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1098-1109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Love, Peter E.D. & Matthews, Jane & Ika, Lavagnon A., 2024. "Rework in relational engineer-to-order production systems: An ‘error-as-process’ archetype," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neumann, Anas & Hajji, Adnene & Rekik, Monia & Pellerin, Robert, 2022. "A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    2. Alexander Rokoss & Marius Syberg & Laura Tomidei & Christian Hülsing & Jochen Deuse & Matthias Schmidt, 2024. "Case study on delivery time determination using a machine learning approach in small batch production companies," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(8), pages 3937-3958, December.
    3. Prajogo, Daniel & Olhager, Jan, 2012. "Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 514-522.
    4. Neumann, Anas & Hajji, Adnene & Rekik, Monia & Pellerin, Robert, 2024. "Integrated planning and scheduling of engineer-to-order projects using a Lamarckian Layered Genetic Algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    5. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    7. Şahika Simsek-Cetinkaya & Simge Evrenol Ocal, 2023. "“Psychological Injuries Are Not Visible†: Experiences and Perceptions of Midwives and Nurses about Domestic Violence during Pregnancy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(8), pages 1115-1123, November.
    8. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    10. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    11. Annette Peart & Virginia Lewis & Chris Barton & Grant Russell, 2020. "Healthcare professionals providing care coordination to people living with multimorbidity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2317-2328, July.
    12. Soo-Yong Shin & Eun-Ju Lim, 2021. "Clinical Work and Life of Mid-Career Male Nurses: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    13. Fatoumata Fofana & Pat Bazeley & Antoine Regnault, 2020. "Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Nuchjarin Intalar & Yasushi Ueki & Chawalit Jeenanunta, 2024. "Enhancing Competitiveness: Driving and Facilitating Factors for Industry 4.0 Adoption in Thai Manufacturing," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Thomas Dax & Oliver Tamme, 2023. "Attractive Landscape Features as Drivers for Sustainable Mountain Tourism Experiences," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Dimitrios Gouglas & Kendall Hoyt & Elizabeth Peacocke & Aristidis Kaloudis & Trygve Ottersen & John-Arne Røttingen, 2019. "Setting Strategic Objectives for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations: An Exploratory Decision Analysis Process," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 430-446, November.
    17. Matthys, Marie-Luise & Acharya, Sushant & Khatri, Sanjaya, 2021. "“Before cardamom, we used to face hardship”: Analyzing agricultural commercialization effects in Nepal through a local concept of the Good Life," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Radomska Joanna & Hajdas Monika & Wołczek Przemysław & Glinka Beata, 2023. "Wide open? Creative industries and open strategizing challenges," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(2), pages 117-136, June.
    19. Stephanie W. Lee & Jing Xu & Tai-Ming Wut & Yui-Yip Lau & Joseph H. L. Chan & Tin-Shing Liu & Louis W. Y. Mok & Jason K. Y. Chan, 2024. "Aging in Place in Hong Kong and Its Implications for Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Needs, Beliefs, Behaviors, and Well-Being of Older Adults through Self-Determination The," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Shailaja Tetali & Sureshkumar Kamalakannan & Shilpa Sadanand & Melissa Glenda Lewis & Sara Varughese & Annie Hans & G. V. S. Murthy, 2022. "Evaluation of the Impact of the First Wave of COVID-19 and Associated Lockdown Restrictions on Persons with Disabilities in 14 States of India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:262:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323001354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.