IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v242y2021ics0925527321002723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated Delphi-MCDM-Bayesian Network framework for production system selection

Author

Listed:
  • Dohale, Vishwas
  • Gunasekaran, Angappa
  • Akarte, Milind
  • Verma, Priyanka

Abstract

Several attempts are needed to choose the most compatible production system for achieving the desired manufacturing outputs. The significant role of manufacturing strategy deployment is selecting the production system best suited for a manufacturing firm. The appropriately chosen production system (strategic process choice) facilitates a firm to produce “order winning” outputs and provides a production competence to achieve business success. This research presents a novel framework to determine the compatible production system for a manufacturing firm. An integrated three-stage Delphi-MCDM-Bayesian Network (BN) framework has been proposed. The process choice criteria (PCC) considered for deciding production systems are identified through an in-depth literature review and then validated by experts through a Delphi method in the first stage. It resulted in the determination of twenty-six PCC. In the second stage, the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) based voting analytical hierarchy process (VAHP) method is adopted to determine each criterion's relative importance for a firm. The relative weights obtained are then used as input for the machine learning (ML) technique- Bayesian network (BN) in the third stage. The BN model quantifies the selection probability of production systems. The proposed Delphi-MCDM-BN framework is demonstrated using a real-life case of a “hydraulic and pneumatic valve” manufacturing firm to select a suitable production system. The three-stage framework is a novel contribution to the literature, which can be used by researchers, practitioners, and manufacturing strategists to choose an appropriate production system for any manufacturing firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Dohale, Vishwas & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akarte, Milind & Verma, Priyanka, 2021. "An integrated Delphi-MCDM-Bayesian Network framework for production system selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:242:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321002723
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527321002723
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders & Berlin, Cecilia & Stahre, Johan, 2017. "Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 154-169.
    2. Ikuobase Emovon & Rosemary A. Norman & Alan J. Murphy, 2018. "Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 519-531, March.
    3. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2006. "Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 113-124, November.
    4. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    5. M. Hossein Safizadeh & Larry P. Ritzman & Deven Sharma & Craig Wood, 1996. "An Empirical Analysis of the Product-Process Matrix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(11), pages 1576-1591, November.
    6. Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin & Hai, Hui Lin, 2005. "The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 308-317, September.
    7. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash, 2016. "A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 68-87.
    8. Jan Olhager & Andreas Feldmann, 2018. "Distribution of manufacturing strategy decision-making in multi-plant networks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 692-708, January.
    9. Miltenburg, John, 2008. "Setting manufacturing strategy for a factory-within-a-factory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 307-323, May.
    10. von der Gracht, Heiko A., 2012. "Consensus measurement in Delphi studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 1525-1536.
    11. Partovi, Fariborz Y., 2007. "An analytical model of process choice in the chemical industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 213-227, January.
    12. Terry J. Hill & Rafael Menda & David M. Dilts, 1998. "Using Product Profiling to Illustrate Manufacturing-Marketing Misalignment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 47-63, August.
    13. S. G. Deshmukh & Abid Haleem, 0. "Framework for Manufacturing in Post-COVID-19 World Order: An Indian Perspective," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-12.
    14. S. G. Deshmukh & Abid Haleem, 2020. "Framework for Manufacturing in Post-COVID-19 World Order: An Indian Perspective," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 49-60, June.
    15. Alejandro Bello-Pintado & Teresa García Marco & Ferdaous Zouaghi, 2019. "Product/process definition, technology adoption and workforce qualification: impact on performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 200-215, January.
    16. Parhizkar, Tarannom & Vinnem, Jan Erik & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer & Mosleh, Ali, 2021. "Supervised Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Complex Systems, Part 1: General Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Sheng-Wei & Lu, Wen-Min, 2024. "Using inverse DEA and machine learning algorithms to evaluate and predict suppliers’ performance in the apple supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    2. Rukiye Kaya & Said Salhi & Virginia Spiegler, 2023. "A novel integration of MCDM methods and Bayesian networks: the case of incomplete expert knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 205-234, January.
    3. Saporiti, Nicolò & Cannas, Violetta Giada & Pozzi, Rossella & Rossi, Tommaso, 2023. "Challenges and countermeasures for digital twin implementation in manufacturing plants: A Delphi study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kemppainen, Katariina & Vepsalainen, Ari P.J. & Tinnila, Markku, 2008. "Mapping the structural properties of production process and product mix," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 713-728, February.
    2. Tiago Afonso & Anabela C. Alves & Paula Carneiro, 2021. "Lean Thinking, Logistic and Ergonomics: Synergetic Triad to Prepare Shop Floor Work Systems to Face Pandemic Situations," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 62-76, December.
    3. Christoph Markmann & Alexander Spickermann & Heiko A. von der Gracht & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Improving the question formulation in Delphi‐like surveys: Analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.
    4. Sourabh Devidas Kulkarni & Priyanka Verma, 2023. "A fuzzy-QFD approach to manufacturing strategy formulation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1407-1432, September.
    5. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    6. Anuradha Patnaik, 2022. "Measuring Demand and Supply Shocks From COVID-19: An Industry-Level Analysis for India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 16(1), pages 76-105, February.
    7. Fritschy, Carolin & Spinler, Stefan, 2019. "The impact of autonomous trucks on business models in the automotive and logistics industry–a Delphi-based scenario study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Ravindra Ojha & Jones Mathew & Umashankar Venkatesh, 2021. "Excellence Through Downstream Innovation in Times of Pandemic: Insights from the Auto Sector," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 16-28, December.
    9. Wen Chen & Lizhi Xing, 2022. "Measuring the Intermediate Goods’ External Dependency on the Global Value Chain: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Chowdhury, Priyabrata & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Kaisar, Shahriar & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Peppel, Marcel & Ringbeck, Jürgen & Spinler, Stefan, 2022. "How will last-mile delivery be shaped in 2040? A Delphi-based scenario study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Sourabh D. Kulkarni & S. G. Deshmukh & Vivek V. Khanzode & Anabela C. Alves, 2021. "Unifying Efforts to Rebound Operational Excellence and Export Competitiveness," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban & Eva Zalokar, 2021. "A Distance-Based AHP-DEA Super-Efficiency Approach for Selecting an Electric Bike Sharing System Provider: One Step Closer to Sustainability and a Win–Win Effect for All Target Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Madjid Tavana & Salman Nazari-Shirkouhi & Hamidreza Farzaneh Kholghabad, 2021. "An integrated quality and resilience engineering framework in healthcare with Z-number data envelopment analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 768-785, December.
    16. Minh-Tai Le & Nhat-Luong Nhieu, 2022. "A Novel Multi-Criteria Assessment Approach for Post-COVID-19 Production Strategies in Vietnam Manufacturing Industry: OPA–Fuzzy EDAS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Dominique Lepore & Alessandra Micozzi & Francesca Spigarelli, 2021. "Industry 4.0 Accelerating Sustainable Manufacturing in the COVID-19 Era: Assessing the Readiness and Responsiveness of Italian Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Avadhut Arun Patwardhan & Neeraj Pandey, 2021. "Analyzing Role of E-SERVQUAL Constructs for Post-pandemic Recovery of Indian Taxi Aggregator Services," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 89-102, December.
    19. Kayvan Miri Lavassani & Bahar Movahedi, 2021. "Firm-Level Analysis of Global Supply Chain Network: Role of Centrality on Firm’s Performance," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 86-103, December.
    20. Chetna Chauhan & Manzoor Ul Akram & Diptanshu Gaur, 2021. "Technology-Driven Responsiveness in Times of COVID-19: A Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP-Based Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 48-61, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:242:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321002723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.