IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v276y2024ics0925527324002056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Additive manufacturing service bureau selection: A Bayesian network integrated framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ghuge, Sagar
  • Akarte, Milind

Abstract

Additive manufacturing service bureaus (AMSBs) are crucial for enabling manufacturing organizations to leverage the benefits of additive manufacturing (AM) technology, such as on-demand manufacturing, production speed, etc., all while eliminating the expense of maintaining inventories. Consequently, many organizations favor AMSBs for expertise, cost efficiency, and access to diverse equipment, materials, and post-processing, reducing the necessity for substantial in-house investments. While researchers have explored evolving business models and the types of AM services offered by AMSBs to some extent, there is a noticeable research gap in selecting the most compatible AMSB for specific customer requirements, which this research would like to address. Initially, this research identifies various types of services offered by AMSBs, classifying them into eight groups: generative, evaluative, explorative, facilitative, constructive, decisive, selective, and assistive. Then, a knowledge-based expert system is introduced to select a suitable type of AM service. Further, 101 AMSB selection criteria are identified and grouped into criteria and sub-criteria by incorporating insights from literature and experts. Then, 26 pertinent criteria were shortlisted through Delphi. Neutrosophic best-worst method is then utilized to quantify criteria weights. Finally, a Bayesian network is used to calculate the selection probability of each AMSB, identifying the AMSB with the highest probability as the most compatible. The robustness of this framework is validated through sensitivity analysis. The practical effectiveness of the framework was demonstrated through a case study involving Ferro Oil-Tech India Private Limited. The analysis of the results provided valuable managerial insights and suggested ways to enhance the business competitiveness of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghuge, Sagar & Akarte, Milind, 2024. "Additive manufacturing service bureau selection: A Bayesian network integrated framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:276:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324002056
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324002056
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacquet-Lagreze, E. & Siskos, J., 1982. "Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 151-164, June.
    2. Colosimo, Bianca Maria & Cavalli, Simona & Grasso, Marco, 2020. "A cost model for the economic evaluation of in-situ monitoring tools in metal additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Dohale, Vishwas & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akarte, Milind & Verma, Priyanka, 2021. "An integrated Delphi-MCDM-Bayesian Network framework for production system selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Friedrich, Anne & Lange, Anne & Elbert, Ralf, 2022. "How additive manufacturing drives business model change: The perspective of logistics service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "A multi-layer Bayesian network method for supply chain disruption modelling in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(17), pages 5258-5276, September.
    6. Kasin Ransikarbum & Wattana Chanthakhot & Tony Glimm & Jettarat Janmontree, 2023. "Evaluation of Sourcing Decision for Hydrogen Supply Chain Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Westerweel, Bram & Basten, Rob J.I. & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2018. "Traditional or Additive Manufacturing? Assessing Component Design Options through Lifecycle Cost Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 570-585.
    8. H. Raghav Rao & B. P. Lingaraj, 1988. "Expert Systems in Production and Operations Management: Classification and Prospects," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 80-91, December.
    9. Lu, Qin & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "Integrating dynamic Bayesian network and physics-based modeling for risk analysis of a time-dependent power distribution system during hurricanes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Ikuobase Emovon & Rosemary A. Norman & Alan J. Murphy, 2018. "Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 519-531, March.
    11. Chan, Hing Kai & Griffin, James & Lim, Jia Jia & Zeng, Fangli & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2018. "The impact of 3D Printing Technology on the supply chain: Manufacturing and legal perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 156-162.
    12. Holzmann, Patrick & Breitenecker, Robert J. & Schwarz, Erich J. & Gregori, Patrick, 2020. "Business model design for novel technologies in nascent industries: An investigation of 3D printing service providers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    14. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    15. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash, 2016. "A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 68-87.
    16. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    17. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Morshedlou, Nazanin & Ivanov, Dmitry & Sarder, M.D. & Barker, Kash & Khaled, Abdullah Al, 2019. "Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 124-137.
    18. Sgarbossa, Fabio & Peron, Mirco & Lolli, Francesco & Balugani, Elia, 2021. "Conventional or additive manufacturing for spare parts management: An extensive comparison for Poisson demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    20. Foshammer, Jeppe & Søberg, Peder Veng & Helo, Petri & Ituarte, Iñigo Flores, 2022. "Identification of aftermarket and legacy parts suitable for additive manufacturing: A knowledge management-based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Beltagui, Ahmad & Gold, Stefan & Kunz, Nathan & Reiner, Gerald, 2023. "Special Issue: Rethinking operations and supply chain management in light of the 3D printing revolution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Xiao-Kang Wang & Wen-Hui Hou & Chao Song & Min-Hui Deng & Yong-Yi Li & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2021. "BW-MaxEnt: A Novel MCDM Method for Limited Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Máximo Méndez & Mariano Frutos & Fabio Miguel & Ricardo Aguasca-Colomo, 2020. "TOPSIS Decision on Approximate Pareto Fronts by Using Evolutionary Algorithms: Application to an Engineering Design Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    6. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    8. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    9. Aziz Naghizadeh Vardin & Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Romualdas Bausys, 2021. "An Integrated Decision Support Model Based on BWM and Fuzzy-VIKOR Techniques for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Heidary Dahooie, Jalil & Qorbani, Ali Reza & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Providing a framework for selecting the appropriate method of technology acquisition considering uncertainty in hierarchical group decision-making: Case Study: Interactive television technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Dhanisetty, V.S. Viswanath & Verhagen, W.J.C. & Curran, Richard, 2018. "Multi-criteria weighted decision making for operational maintenance processes," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 152-164.
    12. Kaur, Harpreet & Prakash Singh, Surya, 2021. "Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Rukiye Kaya & Said Salhi & Virginia Spiegler, 2023. "A novel integration of MCDM methods and Bayesian networks: the case of incomplete expert knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 205-234, January.
    14. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    16. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Lin, Edward M.H. & Sun, Edward W. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2020. "Behavioral data-driven analysis with Bayesian method for risk management of financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2020. "Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 377-399, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:276:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324002056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.