IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v230y2020ics0925527320301705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance

Author

Listed:
  • Benton, W.C.
  • Prahinski, Carol
  • Fan, Ying

Abstract

A major responsibility of purchasing professionals is to monitor the performance of suppliers in their supply chain system. Governance relates to processes and decisions that seek to define actions, and verify supplier performance. Governance mechanisms are the tools in which power and risk are stabilized in interorganizational relationships. As a governance mechanism, supplier development programs (SDPs), which include supplier bilateral/communications, incentives, competitive pressures and direct involvement, represent a surrogate form of power exerted by buying organizations. Bilateral/communication is defined as two-way communication using an evaluation process. The ultimate success of SDPs must assess and be mindful of the supplying organizations’ vantage point. Little is understood about how SDPs influence supplier performance. This is the first large-scale empirical study to investigate the use of supplier development programs (SDPs) as a surrogate for governance power on supplying organizations. Using structural equation modeling and primary data from 141 first-tier North American automotive suppliers, the results suggest that the relationship between SDP and supplier performance is mediated by bilateral/communication, cooperation and commitment, and that SDPs directly affect the relationship between buying and selling organizations. It was found that it is fruitless for buying organizations to implement bilateral/communications, incentives, competitive pressure or direct involvement without first building exceptional relationships with their suppliers. Finally, the findings suggest that bilateral/communications, cooperation and commitment are key drivers of supplier performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Benton, W.C. & Prahinski, Carol & Fan, Ying, 2020. "The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:230:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301705
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320301705
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    2. Robert B. Handfield & Paul D. Cousins & Benn Lawson & Kenneth J. Petersen, 2015. "How Can Supply Management Really Improve Performance? A Knowledge-Based Model of Alignment Capabilities," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(3), pages 3-17, July.
    3. Kyle J. Mayer & Nicholas S. Argyres, 2004. "Learning to Contract: Evidence from the Personal Computer Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 394-410, August.
    4. Janet Bercovitz & Sandy D. Jap & Jack A. Nickerson, 2006. "The Antecedents and Performance Implications of Cooperative Exchange Norms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 724-740, December.
    5. Anoop Madhok & Stephen B. Tallman, 1998. "Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 326-339, June.
    6. Alexander O. Brown & Hau L. Lee & Raja Petrakian, 2000. "Xilinx Improves Its Semiconductor Supply Chain Using Product and Process Postponement," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 65-80, August.
    7. Hartley, Janet L. & Choi, Thomas Y., 1996. "Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 37-44.
    8. Niels J. Pulles & Jasper Veldman & Holger Schiele & Henk Sierksma, 2014. "Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 16-36, July.
    9. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Badrinarayanan, Vishag & Ramachandran, Indu, 2024. "Relational exchanges in the sales domain: A review and research agenda through the lens of commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Jian, Jianhui & Hu, Dan & Tang, Zimeng & Xing, Jingyan, 2024. "Taking advantage of the fire: Does firm performance feedback have a supply chain contagion effect?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Ismail Abdi Changalima & Ismail Juma Ismail & Alban Dismas Mchopa, 2021. "A review of the forms, rationale, and challenges of supplier development in public procurement: lessons for public buyers in Tanzania," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Zhou, Rui & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Sherwin, Michael D. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for selecting supplier development programs to proactively mitigate supplier risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou, 2014. "Managing contracts for fairness in buyer–supplier exchanges," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(10), pages 1508-1527, October.
    2. Sande, Jon Bingen & Haugland, Sven A., 2015. "Strategic performance effects of misaligned formal contracting: The mediating role of relational contracting," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 187-194.
    3. Martinez-Noya, Andrea & Narula, Rajneesh, 2018. "What more can we learn from R&D alliances? : A review and research agenda," MERIT Working Papers 2018-022, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Kannan Srikanth & Phanish Puranam, 2014. "The Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Software Services Offshoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1253-1271, August.
    5. Desmond (Ho-Fu) Lo & Kellilynn M. Frias & Mrinal Ghosh, 2012. "Price Formats for Branded Components in Industrial Markets: An Integration of Transaction Cost Economics and the Resource-Based View," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1282-1297, October.
    6. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Sungmin Ryu, 2008. "Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 39-55, February.
    7. Africa Ariño & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Kyle J. Mayer & Juan Jané, 2014. "Contracts, Negotiation, and Learning: An Examination of Termination Provisions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 379-405, May.
    8. Mooi, Erik A. & Gilliland, David I., 2013. "How contracts and enforcement explain transaction outcomes," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 395-405.
    9. Shantala Samant & Jongwook Kim, 2021. "Determinants of common benefits and private benefits in innovation alliances," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 294-307, March.
    10. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    11. Guo, Shiau-Ling, 2023. "The governance implication of the geographic concentration of franchise activities for franchise relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Bercovitz, Janet & Feldman, Maryann, 2011. "The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 81-93, February.
    13. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Todd R. Zenger, 2008. "Examining the Conditional Limits of Relational Governance: Specialized Assets, Performance Ambiguity, and Long‐Standing Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1195-1216, November.
    14. Achim Hecker, 2009. "Determinanten von Offshore-Outsourcing-Aktivitäten im deutschen Mittelstand," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 628-653, September.
    15. Valentina Morandi, 2013. "The management of industry–university joint research projects: how do partners coordinate and control R&D activities?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 69-92, April.
    16. Koo, JaSeung & Yamanoi, Junichi & Sakano, Tomoaki, 2020. "Acquisition announcements and stock market valuations of acquiring firms’ alliance partners: A transaction cost perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 129-140.
    17. Andaç T. Arıkan, 2020. "Opportunism is in the Eye of the Beholder: Antecedents of Subjective Opportunism Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 573-589, January.
    18. Lauren Skinner Beitelspacher & Thomas L. Baker & Adam Rapp & Dhruv Grewal, 2018. "Understanding the long-term implications of retailer returns in business-to-business relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 252-272, March.
    19. Windsperger, Josef, 2001. "The fee structure in franchising: a property rights view," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 219-226, November.
    20. Van Wijk, Raymond & Nadolska, Anna, 2020. "Making more of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio coordination," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 388-399.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:230:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.