IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v171y2016ip4p471-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model

Author

Listed:
  • Mossa, G.
  • Boenzi, F.
  • Digiesi, S.
  • Mummolo, G.
  • Romano, V.A.

Abstract

The competitiveness of modern manufacturing systems is based on a high production rate and a high level of flexibility. Despite the high level of automation achieved in production systems, flexibility is often provided by human dexterity and the cognitive capabilities of the workforce, as in assembly lines. In the case of repetitive manual tasks, workers are exposed to the risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). In these contexts, a high production rate leads to high physical workload, and job rotation is adopted in order to reduce the ergonomic risk. Traditionally, ergonomics and human performance issues have been investigated separately. However, in the design and scheduling of human-based manufacturing systems, a reliable description of human components is required in order to jointly evaluate production system performance and assess workers׳ risk of MSDs

Suggested Citation

  • Mossa, G. & Boenzi, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mummolo, G. & Romano, V.A., 2016. "Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 471-477.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:171:y:2016:i:p4:p:471-477
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552731500225X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Digiesi, Salvatore & Kock, Ad A.A. & Mummolo, Giovanni & Rooda, Jacobus E., 2009. "The effect of dynamic worker behavior on flow line performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 368-377, August.
    2. Francas, David & Löhndorf, Nils & Minner, Stefan, 2011. "Machine and labor flexibility in manufacturing networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 165-174, May.
    3. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    4. Costa, Alysson M. & Miralles, Cristóbal, 2009. "Job rotation in assembly lines employing disabled workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 625-632, August.
    5. Otto, Alena & Scholl, Armin, 2011. "Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 277-286, July.
    6. Wipawee Tharmmaphornphilas & Bryan Norman, 2007. "A methodology to create robust job rotation schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 339-360, November.
    7. Thun, Jörn-Henrik & Lehr, Christian B. & Bierwirth, Max, 2011. "Feel free to feel comfortable--An empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 551-561, October.
    8. Becker, Christian & Scholl, Armin, 2006. "A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 694-715, February.
    9. Moreira, Mayron César O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2013. "Hybrid heuristics for planning job rotation schedules in assembly lines with heterogeneous workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 552-560.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Thulisile Manyi & Rosemary Sibanda & Ankit Katrodia, 2018. "The Effect of Using Multi-Skilled Workforce on the Flexibility of Project Resource Scheduling and Project Costs," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 235-251.
    3. Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Xu, Shuling & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Fatigue, personnel scheduling and operations: Review and research opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 807-822.
    5. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2023. "Master Production Scheduling with Consideration of Utilization-Dependent Exhaustion and Capacity Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Ercan Şenyiğit & Uğur Atici & Mehmet Burak Şenol, 2022. "Effects of OCRA parameters and learning rate on machine scheduling," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 941-959, September.
    8. Bouaziz, Nourddine & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Sahnoun, M’hammed & Yassine, Adnan, 2024. "Incorporating uncertain human behavior in production scheduling for enhanced productivity in Industry 5.0 context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. László Péter Pusztai & Lajos Nagy & István Budai, 2023. "A Risk Management Framework for Industry 4.0 Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier, 2021. "Ageing workforce effects in Dual-Resource Constrained job-shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    3. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    4. Bautista, Joaquín & Batalla-García, Cristina & Alfaro-Pozo, Rocío, 2016. "Models for assembly line balancing by temporal, spatial and ergonomic risk attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 814-829.
    5. Mao, Zhaofang & Sun, Yiting & Fang, Kan & Huang, Dian & Zhang, Jiaxin, 2024. "Balancing and scheduling of assembly line with multi-type collaborative robots," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    6. Tiacci, Lorenzo & Mimmi, Mario, 2018. "Integrating ergonomic risks evaluation through OCRA index and balancing/sequencing decisions for mixed model stochastic asynchronous assembly lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 112-138.
    7. Otto, Alena & Li, Xiyu, 2020. "Product sequencing in multiple-piece-flow assembly lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier & Dolgui, Alexandre & Hagemann, Johannes & Horlemann, Anika & Kovalev, Sergey & Malyutin, Sergey, 2015. "Workforce minimization for a mixed-model assembly line in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 489-500.
    10. Koltai, Tamás & Dimény, Imre & Gallina, Viola & Gaal, Alexander & Sepe, Chiara, 2021. "An analysis of task assignment and cycle times when robots are added to human-operated assembly lines, using mathematical programming models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. Walter, Rico & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2021. "SALSA: Combining branch-and-bound with dynamic programming to smoothen workloads in simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 857-873.
    12. Moreira, Mayron César O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2013. "Hybrid heuristics for planning job rotation schedules in assembly lines with heterogeneous workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 552-560.
    13. García-Villoria, Alberto & Corominas, Albert & Nadal, Adrià & Pastor, Rafael, 2018. "Solving the accessibility windows assembly line problem level 1 and variant 1 (AWALBP-L1-1) with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 882-895.
    14. Borba, Leonardo & Ritt, Marcus & Miralles, Cristóbal, 2018. "Exact and heuristic methods for solving the Robotic Assembly Line Balancing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 146-156.
    15. Olcay Polat & Can B. Kalayci & Özcan Mutlu & Surendra M. Gupta, 2016. "A two-phase variable neighbourhood search algorithm for assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem type-II: an industrial case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 722-741, February.
    16. Pereira, Jordi & Ritt, Marcus, 2023. "Exact and heuristic methods for a workload allocation problem with chain precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 387-398.
    17. Urban, Timothy L. & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan, 2016. "Designing energy-efficient serial production lines: The unpaced synchronous line-balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 789-801.
    18. Arnd Huchzermeier & Tobias Mönch, 2023. "Mixed‐model assembly lines with variable takt and open stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 704-722, March.
    19. Ibrahim Kucukkoc & Kadir Buyukozkan & Sule Itir Satoglu & David Z. Zhang, 2019. "A mathematical model and artificial bee colony algorithm for the lexicographic bottleneck mixed-model assembly line balancing problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2913-2925, December.
    20. M. H. Alavidoost & M. H. Fazel Zarandi & Mosahar Tarimoradi & Yaser Nemati, 2017. "Modified genetic algorithm for simple straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing with fuzzy processing times," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 313-336, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:171:y:2016:i:p4:p:471-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.