IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1395-d1032604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk Management Framework for Industry 4.0 Environment

Author

Listed:
  • László Péter Pusztai

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary
    Doctoral School of Informatics, University of Debrecen, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Lajos Nagy

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • István Budai

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

In past decades, manufacturing companies have paid considerable attention to using their available resources in the most efficient way to satisfy customer demands. This endeavor is supported by many Industry 4.0 methods. One of these is called MES (Manufacturing Execution System), which is applied for monitoring and controlling manufacturing by recording and processing production-related data. This article presents a possible method of implementation of a risk-adjusted production schedule in a data-rich environment. The framework is based on production datasets of multiple workshops, which is followed by statistical analysis, and its results are used in stochastic network models. The outcome of the simulation is implemented in a production scheduling model to determine how to assign the production among workshops. After collecting the necessary data, the reliability indicator-based stochastic critical path method was applied in the case study. Two cases were presented based on the importance of inventory cost and two different scheduling results were created and presented. With the objective of the least inventory cost, the production was postponed to the latest time possible, which means that workshops had more time to finish their previous work on the first day due to the small production quantity. When the cost was not relevant, the production started on the first day of each workshop, and the production was completed before the deadline. These are optimal solutions, but alternative solutions can also be performed by the decision maker based on the results. The use of the modified stochastic critical path method and its analysis shed light on the deficiency of the production, which is a merit in the continuous improvement process and the estimation of the total project time.

Suggested Citation

  • László Péter Pusztai & Lajos Nagy & István Budai, 2023. "A Risk Management Framework for Industry 4.0 Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1395-:d:1032604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chia-Nan Wang & Ying-Fang Huang & Thi-Nham Le & Thanh-Tuan Ta, 2016. "An Innovative Approach to Enhancing the Sustainable Development of Japanese Automobile Suppliers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Chi, Chia-Fen & Sigmund, Davin & Astardi, Martin Octavianus, 2020. "Classification Scheme for Root Cause and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) of Passenger Vehicle Recalls," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Mossa, G. & Boenzi, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mummolo, G. & Romano, V.A., 2016. "Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 471-477.
    4. Trevino-Martinez, Samuel & Sawhney, Rapinder & Shylo, Oleg, 2022. "Energy-carbon footprint optimization in sequence-dependent production scheduling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    5. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    6. Mirco Peron & Giuseppe Fragapane & Fabio Sgarbossa & Michael Kay, 2020. "Digital Facility Layout Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catanzaro, Daniele & Pesenti, Raffaele & Ronco, Roberto, 2023. "Job scheduling under Time-of-Use energy tariffs for sustainable manufacturing: a survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1091-1109.
    2. Jeoung Yul Lee & Ilkhom Okmirzaevich Irisboev & Yeon-Sik Ryu, 2021. "Literature Review on Digitalization in Facilities Management and Facilities Management Performance Measurement: Contribution of Industry 4.0 in the Global Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Song, Hongqing & Lao, Junming & Zhang, Liyuan & Xie, Chiyu & Wang, Yuhe, 2023. "Underground hydrogen storage in reservoirs: pore-scale mechanisms and optimization of storage capacity and efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    4. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    5. Arindam Das, 2023. "The Relationship between International Trade in Industry 4.0 Products and National-Level Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Meiling Li & Lijie Zhang & Zhuangzhuang Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Digital Economy on Inter-Regional Trade: An Empirical Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Wenwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2018. "The Collaborative Networks and Thematic Trends of Research on Purchasing and Supply Management for Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Huang, Ding-Hsiang & Huang, Cheng-Fu & Lin, Yi-Kuei, 2020. "Exact project reliability for a multi-state project network subject to time and budget constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Thulisile Manyi & Rosemary Sibanda & Ankit Katrodia, 2018. "The Effect of Using Multi-Skilled Workforce on the Flexibility of Project Resource Scheduling and Project Costs," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 235-251.
    10. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Veera Babu Ramakurthi & Vijaya Kumar Manupati & Leonilde Varela & Goran Putnik, 2023. "Leveraging Blockchain to Support Collaborative Distributed Manufacturing Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Chen, Yinuo & Tian, Zhigang & He, Rui & Wang, Yifei & Xie, Shuyi, 2023. "Discovery of potential risks for the gas transmission station using monitoring data and the OOBN method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Toly Chen, 2016. "Competitive and Sustainable Manufacturing in the Age of Globalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    14. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo, 2022. "Fields Touched by Digitalization: Analysis of Scientific Activity in Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Zhang, Chen & Hu, Di & Yang, Tao, 2024. "Research of artificial intelligence operations for wind turbines considering anomaly detection, root cause analysis, and incremental training," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Zhexuan Zhou & Yajie Dou & Jianbin Sun & Jiang Jiang & Yuejin Tan, 2017. "Sustainable Production Line Evaluation Based on Evidential Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Donggi Kim & Keuntae Cho, 2022. "Digital Transformation Characteristics of the Semiconductor Industry Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    19. Ercan Şenyiğit & Uğur Atici & Mehmet Burak Şenol, 2022. "Effects of OCRA parameters and learning rate on machine scheduling," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 941-959, September.
    20. Bhattacharjee, Pushparenu & Dey, Vidyut & Mandal, U.K. & Paul, Susmita, 2022. "Quantitative risk assessment of submersible pump components using Interval number-based Multinomial Logistic Regression(MLR) model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1395-:d:1032604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.