IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v143y2013i2p605-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process performance improvement in justice organizations—Pitfalls of performance measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Pekkanen, Petra
  • Niemi, Petri

Abstract

The paper focuses on the problems and pitfalls of process performance measurement in justice organizations and the possible negative on process performance. The characteristics and pitfalls of process performance measurement in justice organizations are analyzed with two case studies conducted in two Finnish courts. The empirical findings are compared to the attributes of a good performance measurement system adopted from the literature. It is found that the main areas needing attention in judicial performance measurement are: understanding the causal relationships, improving the informativeness of used measures, improving the role of the measures as communication devices, and using the measures as incentives for improvement. On the basis of these findings, some potential solutions for improving performance measurement in public sector professional organizations are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Pekkanen, Petra & Niemi, Petri, 2013. "Process performance improvement in justice organizations—Pitfalls of performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 605-611.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:605-611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312003404
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juhani Ukko & Jarkko Tenhunen & Hannu Rantanen, 2008. "The impacts of performance measurement on the quality of working life," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 86-98.
    2. Juhani Ukko & Sanna Pekkola & Hannu Rantanen, 2009. "A framework to support performance measurement at the operative level of an organisation," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 313-335.
    3. Zapata-Phelan, Cindy P. & Colquitt, Jason A. & Scott, Brent A. & Livingston, Beth, 2009. "Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 93-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aline Pietrix Seepma & Dirk Pieter van Donk & Carolien de Blok, 2021. "On publicness theory and its implications for supply chain integration: The case of criminal justice supply chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 72-103, July.
    2. Mu, Enrique & Chung, Tingting Rachel & Reed, Lawrence Ian, 2017. "Paradigm shift in criminal police lineups: Eyewitness identification as multicriteria decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 95-106.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanna Pekkola & Juhani Ukko, 2008. "Measuring the Effectiveness and Innovative Capability: Case Lahti University Consortium," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(3), pages 62-78.
    2. Xi Chen & Shaofen Fang & Yujie Li & Haibin Wang, 2019. "Does Identification Influence Continuous E-Commerce Consumption? The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Chan, Sow Hup Joanne & Lai, Ho Yan Isabella, 2017. "Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 214-223.
    4. Chen, Xiaogang & Ma, Jing & Jin, Jiafei & Fosh, Patricia, 2013. "Information privacy, gender differences, and intrinsic motivation in the workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 917-926.
    5. Lee, Randy & Mai, Ke Michael & Qiu, Feng & Ilies, Remus & Tang, Pok Man, 2022. "Are you too happy to serve others? When and why positive affect makes customer mistreatment experience feel worse," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán-González & Eric Schniter, 2015. "Why real leisure really matters: incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 284-301, June.
    7. David C. Thomas & Elizabeth C. Ravlin & Yuan Liao & Daniel L. Morrell & Kevin Au, 2016. "Collectivist Values, Exchange Ideology and Psychological Contract Preference," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 255-281, April.
    8. R. Krishankumar & K. S. Ravichandran, 2018. "Realizing the effects of trust and personality in cross functional teams using ANFIS classification framework," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 243-276, June.
    9. Lantao Zhu & Xi Li & YingChuan Wang, 2021. "The Impact of Social Capital on Residents’ Supportive Attitude to Tourism Development: The Mediation Role of Perception of Justice," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    10. Sapna Taneja & Ravikesh Srivastava & N. Ravichandran, 2024. "Employees’ fairness perception towards performance appraisal system: antecedents and consequences," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 2163-2196, August.
    11. Hyung-Woo Lee & Dong-Young Rhee, 2023. "Effects of Organizational Justice on Employee Satisfaction: Integrating the Exchange and the Value-Based Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Juhani Ukko & Sanna Pekkola, 2016. "Customer-centered measurement of service operations: a B2B case study," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 11-21, June.
    13. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Oyniso Zakirova, 2022. "Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Huaiyong Wang & Guangli Lu & Yongfang Liu, 2017. "Ethical Leadership and Loyalty to Supervisor in China: The Roles of Interactional Justice and Collectivistic Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 529-543, December.
    15. Jonathan Farrar & Steven E. Kaplan & Linda Thorne, 2019. "The Effect of Interactional Fairness and Detection on Taxpayers’ Compliance Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 167-180, January.
    16. Jana Hornungová & Kateřina Petrová & František Milichovský, 2020. "Modeling Cause and Effect Relationships of Strategy Map Using Economic and Social Performance Factors in the Organizational Culture," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 613-624.
    17. Cavdar Aksoy, Nilsah & Yazici, Nihal, 2023. "Does justice affect brand advocacy? Online brand advocacy behaviors as a response to hotel customers’ justice perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Johanna Mollerstrom, 2022. "Favoritism and cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 293-307, June.
    19. Liyuan Wang & Tianyi Xie, 2023. "Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Gupta, Vishal, 2013. "Leadership and Creativity in the Indian R&D Laboratories: Examining the Role of Autonomous Motivation, Psychological Capital and Justice Perceptions," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-11-09, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:605-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.