IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v57y2021i3p72-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On publicness theory and its implications for supply chain integration: The case of criminal justice supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Aline Pietrix Seepma
  • Dirk Pieter van Donk
  • Carolien de Blok

Abstract

The literature has extensively discussed whether and how public organizations differ from private ones. Publicness theory argues that the degree of publicness is determined by ownership, funding, goal setting, and control structure of an organization. However, these theoretical ideas have not yet been extended to the interorganizational level. The need for further research is reflected in the sustained debate on the applicability of for‐profit management approaches in public contexts and supply chains. Starting from the premise of the dimensional publicness theory, this study focuses on theory elaboration. We focus our empirical study on the criminal justice supply chain, which encompasses the process of bringing a criminal case to court. This chain provides an interesting public case to explore how specific dimensions of publicness affect or limit supply chain integration mechanisms. The results of our series of embedded cases focusing on Dutch criminal justice supply chains show that control structures, embodied in laws and regulations, define the governance of relationships between supply chain partners. In addition to these formalized ties, extensive known for‐profit information and operational integration mechanisms can be observed, along with limited relational integration. Surprisingly, although similar integration mechanisms are used as in for‐profit contexts, integration serves a different role in several of the relationships investigated: dealing with tensions stemming from the specific goal setting and stakeholders of criminal justice chains. Although our findings specifically relate to criminal justice supply chains, they have important implications for other supply chains using contracts and laws and those being selective in applying supply chain integration in cases of contrasting objectives. Moreover, we provide a stepping‐stone for the extension of publicness theory to the interorganizational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Aline Pietrix Seepma & Dirk Pieter van Donk & Carolien de Blok, 2021. "On publicness theory and its implications for supply chain integration: The case of criminal justice supply chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 72-103, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:57:y:2021:i:3:p:72-103
    DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12245
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jscm.12245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Vaart, Taco & van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2008. "A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 42-55, January.
    2. Jorge A. Rodríguez & Cristina Giménez Thomsen & Daniel Arenas & Mark Pagell, 2016. "NGOs’ Initiatives to Enhance Social Sustainability in the Supply Chain: Poverty Alleviation through Supplier Development Programs," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 83-108, July.
    3. Jonathan L. Johnson & Kevin J. Dooley & David G. Hyatt & Andrew M. Hutson, 2018. "EMERGING DISCOURSE INCUBATOR: Cross†Sector Relations in Global Supply Chains: A Social Capital Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(2), pages 21-33, April.
    4. Steven Tadelis & Oliver E.Williamson, 2012. "Transaction Cost Economics [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
    5. David Dobrzykowski, 2019. "Understanding the Downstream Healthcare Supply Chain: Unpacking Regulatory and Industry Characteristics," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(2), pages 26-46, April.
    6. Chengyong Xiao & Miriam Wilhelm & Taco van der Vaart & Dirk Pieter van Donk, 2019. "Inside the Buying Firm: Exploring Responses to Paradoxical Tensions in Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(1), pages 3-20, January.
    7. Joris Voets & Wouter Van Dooren & Filip De Rynck, 2008. "A Framework for Assessing the Performance of Policy Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 773-790.
    8. Mark Pagell & Brian Fugate & Barbara Flynn, 2018. "From the Editors: Introduction to the Emerging Discourse Incubator on the Topic of Research where the Focal Actor in the Network is not a for†profit Firm," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(2), pages 1-2, April.
    9. Pekkanen, Petra & Niemi, Petri, 2013. "Process performance improvement in justice organizations—Pitfalls of performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 605-611.
    10. Christine Harland & Jan Telgen & Guy Callender & Rick Grimm & Andrea Patrucco, 2019. "Implementing Government Policy in Supply Chains: An International Coproduction Study of Public Procurement," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(2), pages 6-25, April.
    11. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Sánchez-Diaz, Iván & Browne, Michael & Wojtowicz, Jeffrey, 2020. "State of the art and practice of urban freight management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 360-382.
    12. Zoe Radnor & Stephen P. Osborne, 2013. "Lean: A failed theory for public services?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 265-287, February.
    13. Jesper Rosenberg Hansen & Ewan Ferlie, 2016. "Applying Strategic Management Theories in Public Sector Organizations: Developing a typology," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Madeleine Pullman & Annachiara Longoni & Davide Luzzini, 2018. "EMERGING DISCOURSE INCUBATOR: The Roles of Institutional Complexity and Hybridity in Social Impact Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(2), pages 3-20, April.
    15. Gideon D. Markman & Daniel Krause, 2016. "Theory Building Surrounding Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Assessing What We Know, Exploring Where to Go," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 3-10, April.
    16. Jury Gualandris & Robert D. Klassen, 2018. "EMERGING DISCOURSE INCUBATOR: Delivering Transformational Change: Aligning Supply Chains and Stakeholders in Non†Governmental Organizations," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(2), pages 34-48, April.
    17. Lee Matthews & Damien Power & Anne Touboulic & Leonardo Marques, 2016. "Building Bridges: Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 82-94, January.
    18. Frank Montabon & Mark Pagell & Zhaohui Wu, 2016. "Making Sustainability Sustainable," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 11-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Xiaoyan & Chung, Sai-Ho & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2022. "Sustainable supply chain management with NGOs, NPOs, and charity organizations: A systematic review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek & Maciej Szymczak, 2024. "Understanding public service supply chain management: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1879-1943, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cynthia Hardy & Vikram Bhakoo & Steve Maguire, 2020. "A New Methodology for Supply Chain Management: Discourse Analysis and its Potential for Theoretical Advancement," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(2), pages 19-35, April.
    2. Vivek Soundararajan & Miriam M. Wilhelm & Andrew Crane, 2021. "Humanizing Research on Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Building a Path to Decent Work," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(2), pages 3-13, April.
    3. Juliane Reinecke & Jimmy Donaghey, 2021. "Towards Worker‐Driven Supply Chain Governance: Developing Decent Work Through Democratic Worker Participation," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(2), pages 14-28, April.
    4. David E. Cantor & Tingting Yan & Mark Pagell & Wendy L. Tate, 2022. "From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 3-7, April.
    5. Osama Meqdadi & Thomas E Johnsen & Mark Pagell, 2020. "Relationship configurations for procuring from social enterprises," Post-Print hal-02958992, HAL.
    6. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje & David Tappin, 2020. "Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: Evidence from New Zealand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 592-604, February.
    7. Miriam Wilhelm & Veronica H. Villena, 2021. "Cascading Sustainability in Multi‐tier Supply Chains: When Do Chinese Suppliers Adopt Sustainable Procurement?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4198-4218, November.
    8. Mohammad Moshtari & Evelyne Vanpoucke, 2021. "Building Successful NGO–Business Relationships: A Social Capital Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 104-129, July.
    9. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    10. Veronica S Ülgen & Maria Björklund & Niklas Simm & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Inter-Organizational Supply Chain Interaction for Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Sadaat Ali Yawar & Stefan Seuring, 2024. "Inside the world of stepsiblings: Linking global production networks to sustainable supply chain management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 788-805, February.
    12. Govindan, Kannan & Demartini, Melissa & Formentini, Marco & Taticchi, Paolo & Tonelli, Flavio, 2024. "Unravelling and mapping the theoretical foundations of sustainable supply chains: A literature review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Kelsey M. Taylor & Eugenia Rosca, 2023. "Sink, swim, or drift: How social enterprises use supply chain social capital to balance tensions between impact and viability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(2), pages 62-86, April.
    14. Rejaul Hasan & Marguerite Moore & Robert Handfield, 2020. "Addressing Social Issues in Commodity Markets: Using Cost Modeling as an Enabler of Public Policy in the Bangladeshi Apparel Industry," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 25-44, October.
    15. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Liu, Yang & Geng, Duanyang, 2023. "The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Peter Hasle & Jan Vang, 2021. "Designing Better Interventions: Insights from Research on Decent Work," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(2), pages 58-70, April.
    17. Philip Beske-Janssen & Thomas Johnsen & François Constant & Andreas Wieland, 2023. "New competences enhancing Procurement’s contribution to innovation and sustainability [De nouvelles compétences renforçant la contribution des achats à l'innovation et au développement durable]," Post-Print hal-04191381, HAL.
    18. Anne M. Quarshie & Rudolf Leuschner, 2020. "Interorganizational Interaction in Disaster Response Networks: A Government Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(3), pages 3-25, July.
    19. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Zhigang Fan & Fei Dai & Mingu Kang & Kihyun Park & Gukseong Lee, 2024. "Combining internal functional integration with product modularization and supply chain alignment for achieving mass customization," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1197-1212, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:57:y:2021:i:3:p:72-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.