IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v113y2008i1p297-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EPQ models with varying setup cost

Author

Listed:
  • Darwish, M.A.

Abstract

In this paper, the classical economic production quantity (EPQ) model is generalized by considering a relationship between the setup cost and the production run length. The dependency between the setup cost and run length can be related to process deterioration and learning and forgetting effects. Two models are developed, the first of which is for the case when shortages are not allowed and the other one permits shortages. The cost functions associated with these models are proved to be convex and optimal solutions are determined. Results show that the relationship between setup cost and production run length has a significant impact on the optimal lot size and average total cost in the EPQ model. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the utility of the models.

Suggested Citation

  • Darwish, M.A., 2008. "EPQ models with varying setup cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 297-306, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:113:y:2008:i:1:p:297-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(07)00289-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hau L. Lee & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1987. "Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1125-1136, September.
    2. Freimer, Michael & Thomas, Douglas & Tyworth, John, 2006. "The value of setup cost reduction and process improvement for the economic production quantity model with defects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 241-251, August.
    3. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2003. "Lot sizing with learning and forgetting in set-ups and in product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 95-111, January.
    4. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 1999. "The economic manufacture/order quantity (EMQ/EOQ) and the learning curve: Past, present, and future," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 93-102, March.
    5. John P. Leschke & Elliott N. Weiss, 1997. "The Multi-Item Setup-Reduction Investment-Allocation Problem with Continuous Investment-Cost Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 890-894, June.
    6. Willard I. Zangwill, 1987. "From EOQ Towards ZI," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1209-1223, October.
    7. Darwish, M.A. & Ben-Daya, M., 2007. "Effect of inspection errors and preventive maintenance on a two-stage production inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 301-313, May.
    8. Yang, Jiaqin & Deane, Richard H., 1993. "Setup time reduction and competitive advantage in a closed manufacturing cell," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 413-423, September.
    9. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    10. Evan L. Porteus, 1985. "Investing in Reduced Setups in the EOQ Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(8), pages 998-1010, August.
    11. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    12. Anne M. Spence & Evan L. Porteus, 1987. "Setup Reduction and Increased Effective Capacity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1291-1301, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dellino, Gabriella & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Meloni, Carlo, 2010. "Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 52-59, May.
    2. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H., 2021. "The impact of controllable production rates on the performance of inventory systems: A systematic review of the literature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 703-720.
    3. Nadeau, Marie-Claude & Kar, Ashish & Roth, Richard & Kirchain, Randolph, 2010. "A dynamic process-based cost modeling approach to understand learning effects in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 223-234, November.
    4. Javad Sadeghi & Seyed Taghi Akhavan Niaki & Mohammad Reza Malekian & Saeid Sadeghi, 2016. "Optimising multi-item economic production quantity model with trapezoidal fuzzy demand and backordering: two tuned meta-heuristics," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 170-195.
    5. Guchhait, Partha & Kumar Maiti, Manas & Maiti, Manoranjan, 2013. "Production-inventory models for a damageable item with variable demands and inventory costs in an imperfect production process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 180-188.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Coates, Eyler Robert, 1997. "Manufacturing setup cost reduction under variable lead times and finite opportunities for investment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 237-247, May.
    2. Hofmann, Christian, 1998. "Investments in modern production technology and the cash flow-oriented EPQ-model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 193-206, January.
    3. Diaby, Moustapha, 2000. "Integrated batch size and setup reduction decisions in multi-product, dynamic manufacturing environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 219-233, October.
    4. Gong, Qiguo & Chen, Guohui & Zhang, Wen & Wang, Hui, 2022. "The role of humans in flexible smart factories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Diaby, Moustapha, 1995. "Optimal setup time reduction for a single product with dynamic demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 532-540, September.
    6. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    7. Diaby, Moustapha & Cruz, Jose M. & Nsakanda, Aaron L., 2013. "Shortening cycle times in multi-product, capacitated production environments through quality level improvements and setup reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 526-535.
    8. Hong, Jae-Dong & Kim, Seung-Lae & Hayya, Jack C., 1996. "Dynamic setup reduction in production lot sizing with nonconstant deterministic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 182-196, April.
    9. Chandrashekar, Ashok & Callarman, Thomas E., 1998. "A modelling study of the effects of continuous incremental improvement in the case of a process shop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 111-121, August.
    10. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Jamal, A.M.M. & Mondal, Sanjay, 2008. "Optimal batch sizing in a multi-stage production system with rework consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 915-929, February.
    11. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    12. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    13. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    14. M. Jaber & Z. Givi, 2015. "Imperfect production process with learning and forgetting effects," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 129-152, January.
    15. White, Richard E. & Prybutok, Victor, 2001. "The relationship between JIT practices and type of production system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 113-124, April.
    16. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2005. "Integrated production and product inspection policy for a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 123-134, January.
    17. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    18. Nasr, Walid W. & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen K., 2013. "EOQ with a correlated binomial supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 248-255.
    19. Harun Öztürk, 2019. "Modeling an inventory problem with random supply, inspection and machine breakdown," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 497-527, June.
    20. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:113:y:2008:i:1:p:297-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.