IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v583y2021ics0378437121006026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Epps effect under alternative sampling schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Patrick
  • Pienaar, Etienne
  • Gebbie, Tim

Abstract

Time and the choice of measurement time scales is fundamental to how we choose to represent information and data in finance. This choice implies both the units and the aggregation scales for the resulting statistical measurables used to describe a financial system. It also defines how we measure the relationship between different traded instruments. As we move from high-frequency time scales, when individual trade and quote events occur, to the mesoscales when correlations emerge in ways that can conform to various latent models; it remains unclear what choice of time and sampling rates are appropriate to faithfully capture system dynamics and asset correlations for decision making. The Epps effect is the key phenomenology that couples the emergence of correlations to the choice of sampling time scales. Here we consider and compare the Epps effect under different sampling schemes in order to contrast three choices of time: calendar time, volume time and trade time. Using a toy model based on a Hawkes process, we are able to achieve simulation results that conform well with empirical dynamics. Concretely, we find that the Epps effect is present under all three definitions of time and that correlations emerge faster under trade time compared to calendar time, whereas correlations emerge linearly under volume time.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Patrick & Pienaar, Etienne & Gebbie, Tim, 2021. "The Epps effect under alternative sampling schemes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:583:y:2021:i:c:s0378437121006026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437121006026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuel Bacry & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Franc{c}ois Muzy, 2015. "Hawkes processes in finance," Papers 1502.04592, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    2. I. Mastromatteo & M. Marsili & P. Zoi, 2011. "Financial correlations at ultra-high frequency: theoretical models and empirical estimation," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 80(2), pages 243-253, March.
    3. Emanuel Derman, 2002. "The perception of time, risk and return during periods of speculation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 282-296.
    4. Ovidiu V. Precup & Giulia Iori, 2007. "Cross-correlation Measures in the High-frequency Domain," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 319-331.
    5. Iacopo Mastromatteo & Matteo Marsili & Patrick Zoi, 2010. "Financial correlations at ultra-high frequency: theoretical models and empirical estimation," Papers 1011.1011, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2011.
    6. Patrick Chang & Etienne Pienaar & Tim Gebbie, 2020. "Malliavin-Mancino estimators implemented with non-uniform fast Fourier transforms," Papers 2003.02842, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    7. Patrick Chang, 2020. "Fourier instantaneous estimators and the Epps effect," Papers 2007.03453, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    8. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frederic Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: I. Empirical facts," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 991-1012.
    9. Bacry, E. & Delattre, S. & Hoffmann, M. & Muzy, J.F., 2013. "Some limit theorems for Hawkes processes and application to financial statistics," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 2475-2499.
    10. E. Bacry & S. Delattre & M. Hoffmann & J. F. Muzy, 2013. "Modelling microstructure noise with mutually exciting point processes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 65-77, January.
    11. Fukasawa, Masaaki, 2010. "Realized volatility with stochastic sampling," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 829-852, June.
    12. Ioane Muni Toke, 2011. ""Market making" behaviour in an order book model and its impact on the bid-ask spread," Post-Print hal-01705266, HAL.
    13. Tóth, Bence & Palit, Imon & Lillo, Fabrizio & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2015. "Why is equity order flow so persistent?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 218-239.
    14. Patrick Chang, 2020. "Fourier instantaneous estimators and the Epps effect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Oomen, Roel C.A., 2006. "Properties of Realized Variance Under Alternative Sampling Schemes," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 24, pages 219-237, April.
    16. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Fan, Jianqing & Xiu, Dacheng, 2010. "High-Frequency Covariance Estimates With Noisy and Asynchronous Financial Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(492), pages 1504-1517.
    17. Fabrizio Lillo & J. Doyne Farmer & Rosario N. Mantegna, 2003. "Master curve for price-impact function," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6919), pages 129-130, January.
    18. Jim Gatheral & Thibault Jaisson & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2018. "Volatility is rough," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 933-949, June.
    19. Michael C. Münnix & Rudi Schäfer & Thomas Guhr, 2011. "Statistical Causes For The Epps Effect In Microstructure Noise," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(08), pages 1231-1246.
    20. David Easley & Marcos M. López de Prado & Maureen O'Hara, 2012. "Flow Toxicity and Liquidity in a High-frequency World," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(5), pages 1457-1493.
    21. Emanuel Derman, 2002. "The Perception of Time, Risk and Return During Periods of Speculation," Papers cond-mat/0201345, arXiv.org.
    22. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frédéric Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: I. Empirical facts," Post-Print hal-00621058, HAL.
    23. Emmanuel Bacry & Sylvain Delattre & Marc Hoffmann & Jean-François Muzy, 2013. "Modelling microstructure noise with mutually exciting point processes," Post-Print hal-01313995, HAL.
    24. Jim Griffin & Roel Oomen, 2008. "Sampling Returns for Realized Variance Calculations: Tick Time or Transaction Time?," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-3), pages 230-253.
    25. Emmanuel Bacry & Sylvain Delattre & Marc Hoffmann & Jean-François Muzy, 2013. "Some limit theorems for Hawkes processes and application to financial statistics," Post-Print hal-01313994, HAL.
    26. Michael C. Munnix & Rudi Schafer & Thomas Guhr, 2010. "Impact of the tick-size on financial returns and correlations," Papers 1001.5124, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2010.
    27. Münnix, Michael C. & Schäfer, Rudi & Guhr, Thomas, 2010. "Impact of the tick-size on financial returns and correlations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(21), pages 4828-4843.
    28. Maria Elvira Mancino & Paul Malliavin, 2002. "Fourier series method for measurement of multivariate volatilities," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 49-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivan Jericevich & Patrick Chang & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Simulation and estimation of an agent-based market-model with a matching engine," Papers 2108.07806, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Chang & Etienne Pienaar & Tim Gebbie, 2020. "The Epps effect under alternative sampling schemes," Papers 2011.11281, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    2. Patrick Chang & Roger Bukuru & Tim Gebbie, 2019. "Revisiting the Epps effect using volume time averaging: An exercise in R," Papers 1912.02416, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    3. Juan C. Henao-Londono & Sebastian M. Krause & Thomas Guhr, 2021. "Price response functions and spread impact in correlated financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(4), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Patrick Chang & Etienne Pienaar & Tim Gebbie, 2020. "Detecting discrete processes with the Epps effect," Papers 2005.10568, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    5. Omar Euch & Masaaki Fukasawa & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2018. "The microstructural foundations of leverage effect and rough volatility," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 241-280, April.
    6. Henao-Londono, Juan C. & Guhr, Thomas, 2022. "Foreign exchange markets: Price response and spread impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 589(C).
    7. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2017. "Limit order book modelling with high dimensional Hawkes processes," Working Papers hal-01512430, HAL.
    8. El Euch Omar & Fukasawa Masaaki & Rosenbaum Mathieu, 2016. "The microstructural foundations of leverage effect and rough volatility," Papers 1609.05177, arXiv.org.
    9. Koike, Yuta, 2014. "Limit theorems for the pre-averaged Hayashi–Yoshida estimator with random sampling," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 2699-2753.
    10. Ingemar Kaj & Mine Caglar, 2017. "A buffer Hawkes process for limit order books," Papers 1710.03506, arXiv.org.
    11. Marcello Rambaldi & Emmanuel Bacry & Fabrizio Lillo, 2016. "The role of volume in order book dynamics: a multivariate Hawkes process analysis," Papers 1602.07663, arXiv.org.
    12. Chen, Zezhun & Dassios, Angelos, 2022. "Cluster point processes and Poisson thinning INARMA," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113652, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Aurélien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2016. "Dynamic optimal execution in a mixed-market-impact Hawkes price model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 183-218, January.
    14. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2018. "High dimensional Hawkes processes for limit order books Modelling, empirical analysis and numerical calibration," Post-Print hal-01686122, HAL.
    15. Aurélien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2016. "Dynamic optimal execution in a mixed-market-impact Hawkes price model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 183-218, January.
    16. Emmanuel Bacry & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Franc{c}ois Muzy, 2015. "Hawkes processes in finance," Papers 1502.04592, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    17. Ioane Muni Toke & Nakahiro Yoshida, 2020. "Marked point processes and intensity ratios for limit order book modeling," Papers 2001.08442, arXiv.org.
    18. Thibault Jaisson & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Rough fractional diffusions as scaling limits of nearly unstable heavy tailed Hawkes processes," Papers 1504.03100, arXiv.org.
    19. Thomas Deschatre & Pierre Gruet, 2021. "Electricity intraday price modeling with marked Hawkes processes," Papers 2103.07407, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:583:y:2021:i:c:s0378437121006026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.