IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2310.06079.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Anomalous diffusion and price impact in the fluid-limit of an order book

Author

Listed:
  • Derick Diana
  • Tim Gebbie

Abstract

We extend a Discrete Time Random Walk (DTRW) numerical scheme to simulate the anomalous diffusion of financial market orders in a simulated order book. Here using random walks with Sibuya waiting times to include a time-dependent stochastic forcing function with non-uniformly sampled times between order book events in the setting of fractional diffusion. This models the fluid limit of an order book by modelling the continuous arrival, cancellation and diffusion of orders in the presence of information shocks. We study the impulse response and stylised facts of orders undergoing anomalous diffusion for different forcing functions and model parameters. Concretely, we demonstrate the price impact for flash limit-orders and market orders and show how the numerical method generate kinks in the price impact. We use cubic spline interpolation to generate smoothed price impact curves. The work promotes the use of non-uniform sampling in the presence of diffusive dynamics as the preferred simulation method.

Suggested Citation

  • Derick Diana & Tim Gebbie, 2023. "Anomalous diffusion and price impact in the fluid-limit of an order book," Papers 2310.06079, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.06079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.06079
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Jericevich & Patrick Chang & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Simulation and estimation of an agent-based market-model with a matching engine," Papers 2108.07806, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    2. Donovan Platt, 2019. "A Comparison of Economic Agent-Based Model Calibration Methods," Papers 1902.05938, arXiv.org.
    3. Albert S. Kyle & Anna A. Obizhaeva, 2016. "Market Microstructure Invariance: Empirical Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 1345-1404, July.
    4. Donovan Platt & Tim Gebbie, 2016. "The Problem of Calibrating an Agent-Based Model of High-Frequency Trading," Papers 1606.01495, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    5. J. Donier & J. Bonart & I. Mastromatteo & J.-P. Bouchaud, 2015. "A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 1109-1121, July.
    6. Jonathan Donier & Julius Bonart & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2014. "A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact," Papers 1412.0141, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    7. Lee, Charles M C & Ready, Mark J, 1991. "Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(2), pages 733-746, June.
    8. Farmer, J. Doyne & Joshi, Shareen, 2002. "The price dynamics of common trading strategies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 149-171, October.
    9. Austin Gerig, 2008. "A Theory for Market Impact: How Order Flow Affects Stock Price," Papers 0804.3818, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2008.
    10. Ivan Jericevich & Patrick Chang & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Simulation and estimation of a point-process market-model with a matching engine," Papers 2105.02211, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    11. Chiarella, Carl & Iori, Giulia, 2009. "The impact of heterogeneous trading rules on the limit order book and order flows," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 525-537.
    12. Annalisa Fabretti, 2013. "On the problem of calibrating an agent based model for financial markets," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(2), pages 277-293, October.
    13. Albert S. Kyle & Anna A. Obizhaeva, 2016. "Market Microstructure Invariance: Empirical Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1345-1404, July.
    14. Kiyoshi Kanazawa & Takumi Sueshige & Hideki Takayasu & Misako Takayasu, 2018. "Kinetic Theory for Finance Brownian Motion from Microscopic Dynamics," Papers 1802.05993, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dominic Bauer & Derick Diana & Tim Gebbie, 2024. "Correlation emergence in two coupled simulated limit order books," Papers 2408.03181, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Platt, Donovan & Gebbie, Tim, 2018. "Can agent-based models probe market microstructure?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 1092-1106.
    2. Matthew Dicks & Andrew Paskaramoorthy & Tim Gebbie, 2023. "Many learning agents interacting with an agent-based market model," Papers 2303.07393, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    3. Coen, Jamie & Lepore, Caterina & Schaanning, Eric, 2019. "Taking regulation seriously: fire sales under solvency and liquidity constraints," Bank of England working papers 793, Bank of England.
    4. Jing Nie & Juliana Malagon & Julian Williams, 2022. "The impact of high speed quoting on execution risk dynamics: Evidence from interest rate futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 1434-1465, August.
    5. Yuki Sato & Kiyoshi Kanazawa, 2023. "Exact solution to a generalised Lillo-Mike-Farmer model with heterogeneous order-splitting strategies," Papers 2306.13378, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    6. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    7. Onur, Esen & Roberts, John S. & Tuzun, Tugkan, 2023. "Trader positions and aggregate portfolio demand," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    8. Dicks, Matthew & Paskaramoorthy, Andrew & Gebbie, Tim, 2024. "A simple learning agent interacting with an agent-based market model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
    9. Donovan Platt & Tim Gebbie, 2016. "The Problem of Calibrating an Agent-Based Model of High-Frequency Trading," Papers 1606.01495, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    10. Alexandru Mandes & Peter Winker, 2017. "Complexity and model comparison in agent based modeling of financial markets," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(3), pages 469-506, October.
    11. Dominic Bauer & Derick Diana & Tim Gebbie, 2024. "Correlation emergence in two coupled simulated limit order books," Papers 2408.03181, arXiv.org.
    12. Lauter, Tobias & Prokopczuk, Marcel, 2022. "Measuring commodity market quality," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Ai Jun Hou & Lars L. Nordén & Caihong Xu, 2024. "Futures trading costs and market microstructure invariance: Identifying bet activity," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 901-922, June.
    14. Chen, Zhimin & Ibragimov, Rustam, 2019. "One country, two systems? The heavy-tailedness of Chinese A- and H- share markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 115-141.
    15. Fengpei Li & Vitalii Ihnatiuk & Ryan Kinnear & Anderson Schneider & Yuriy Nevmyvaka, 2022. "Do price trajectory data increase the efficiency of market impact estimation?," Papers 2205.13423, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    16. Fr'ed'eric Bucci & Michael Benzaquen & Fabrizio Lillo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Slow decay of impact in equity markets: insights from the ANcerno database," Papers 1901.05332, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    17. Fr'ed'eric Bucci & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Michael Benzaquen & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Impact is not just volatility," Papers 1905.04569, arXiv.org.
    18. Ivan Jericevich & Murray McKechnie & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Calibrating an adaptive Farmer-Joshi agent-based model for financial markets," Papers 2104.09863, arXiv.org.
    19. Yamamoto, Ryuichi & Hirata, Hideaki, 2013. "Strategy switching in the Japanese stock market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 2010-2022.
    20. Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea & Sani, Amir, 2018. "Agent-based model calibration using machine learning surrogates," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 366-389.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.06079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.