IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v228y2014i2p139-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing topological and reliability-based vulnerability analysis of Iran power transmission network

Author

Listed:
  • Zohre Alipour
  • Mohammad Ali Saniee Monfared
  • Enrico Zio

Abstract

Power grids are one of the most important and critical infrastructures which societies rely upon for well-being. Their topological (structural) characteristics related to vulnerability can be analyzed from the viewpoint of complex network theory. In this article, we incorporate into this viewpoint some relevant reliability properties and apply the analysis framework to study the high-voltage power grid in Iran. To identify weak points in the structure, we look at four different centrality measures, namely, degree, betweenness, information and closeness, and analyze their correlation properties. This allows providing a more comprehensive picture of the vulnerability characteristics of the power grid structure. By our analysis, we show that reliability-based characteristics are different from purely topological ones as they are mostly uncorrelated. We also use a voting aggregation method, the Borda Count method, to perform an overall ranking of the most vulnerable nodes, considering both intentional attacks and random failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Zohre Alipour & Mohammad Ali Saniee Monfared & Enrico Zio, 2014. "Comparing topological and reliability-based vulnerability analysis of Iran power transmission network," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 139-151, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:2:p:139-151
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13501652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13501652
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13501652?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R. & Rocco S., C.M., 2012. "Identifying groups of critical edges in a realistic electrical network by multi-objective genetic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 172-177.
    2. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R. & Sansavini, G., 2012. "Optimizing protections against cascades in network systems: A modified binary differential evolution algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    3. Wang, Kai & Zhang, Bu-han & Zhang, Zhe & Yin, Xiang-gen & Wang, Bo, 2011. "An electrical betweenness approach for vulnerability assessment of power grids considering the capacity of generators and load," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4692-4701.
    4. Der Kiureghian, Armen & Song, Junho, 2008. "Multi-scale reliability analysis and updating of complex systems by use of linear programming," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 288-297.
    5. Li, Y.F. & Sansavini, G. & Zio, E., 2013. "Non-dominated sorting binary differential evolution for the multi-objective optimization of cascading failures protection in complex networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 195-205.
    6. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2004. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 340(1), pages 388-394.
    7. Zwicker, William S., 1991. "The voters' paradox, spin, and the Borda count," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 187-227, December.
    8. Cadini, F. & Zio, E. & Petrescu, C.A., 2010. "Optimal expansion of an existing electrical power transmission network by multi-objective genetic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 173-181.
    9. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    10. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    11. Chen, Guo & Dong, Zhao Yang & Hill, David J. & Zhang, Guo Hua, 2009. "An improved model for structural vulnerability analysis of power networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(19), pages 4259-4266.
    12. Steven H. Strogatz, 2001. "Exploring complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6825), pages 268-276, March.
    13. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo, 2004. "A topological analysis of the Italian electric power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 338(1), pages 92-97.
    14. Haarla, Liisa & Pulkkinen, Urho & Koskinen, Mikko & Jyrinsalo, Jussi, 2008. "A method for analysing the reliability of a transmission grid," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 277-287.
    15. E. Zio, 2007. "From complexity science to reliability efficiency: a new way of looking at complex network systems and critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 488-508.
    16. Chen, Guo & Dong, Zhao Yang & Hill, David J. & Zhang, Guo Hua & Hua, Ke Qian, 2010. "Attack structural vulnerability of power grids: A hybrid approach based on complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(3), pages 595-603.
    17. Zio, Enrico & Piccinelli, Roberta & Delfanti, Maurizio & Olivieri, Valeria & Pozzi, Mauro, 2012. "Application of the load flow and random flow models for the analysis of power transmission networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 102-109.
    18. Bompard, Ettore & Napoli, Roberto & Xue, Fei, 2009. "Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 5-12.
    19. Eusgeld, Irene & Kröger, Wolfgang & Sansavini, Giovanni & Schläpfer, Markus & Zio, Enrico, 2009. "The role of network theory and object-oriented modeling within a framework for the vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 954-963.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Honglu & Tian, Zhihong & Huang, Anqiang & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Analysis of vulnerabilities in maritime supply chains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 475-484.
    2. Johnson, Caroline A. & Flage, Roger & Guikema, Seth D., 2019. "Characterising the robustness of coupled power-law networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    4. Abedi, Amin & Gaudard, Ludovic & Romerio, Franco, 2019. "Review of major approaches to analyze vulnerability in power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 153-172.
    5. Xiaoxiao Guo & Yanghong Tan & Feng Wang, 2020. "Modeling and Fault Propagation Analysis of Cyber–Physical Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Corrado lo Storto, 2019. "An SNA-DEA Prioritization Framework to Identify Critical Nodes of Gas Networks: The Case of the US Interstate Gas Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Tianhua Li & Yanchao Du & Yongbo Yuan, 2019. "Use of Variable Fuzzy Clustering to Quantify the Vulnerability of a Power Grid to Earthquake Damage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abedi, Amin & Gaudard, Ludovic & Romerio, Franco, 2019. "Review of major approaches to analyze vulnerability in power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 153-172.
    2. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Compare, Michele & Bellani, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "Optimal allocation of prognostics and health management capabilities to improve the reliability of a power transmission network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 164-180.
    5. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R., 2012. "Analyzing the topological, electrical and reliability characteristics of a power transmission system for identifying its critical elements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 67-74.
    6. Liu, Honglu & Tian, Zhihong & Huang, Anqiang & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Analysis of vulnerabilities in maritime supply chains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 475-484.
    7. Lucas Cuadra & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz & Javier Del Ser & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Zong Woo Geem, 2015. "A Critical Review of Robustness in Power Grids Using Complex Networks Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-55, August.
    8. Han, Fangyuan & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "A multi-perspective framework of analysis of critical infrastructures with respect to supply service, controllability and topology," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Wang, Kai & Zhang, Bu-han & Zhang, Zhe & Yin, Xiang-gen & Wang, Bo, 2011. "An electrical betweenness approach for vulnerability assessment of power grids considering the capacity of generators and load," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4692-4701.
    10. Xue, Fei & Bompard, Ettore & Huang, Tao & Jiang, Lin & Lu, Shaofeng & Zhu, Huaiying, 2017. "Interrelation of structure and operational states in cascading failure of overloading lines in power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 728-740.
    11. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2013. "The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2688-2700.
    12. Wang, Zhuoyang & Chen, Guo & Hill, David J. & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2016. "A power flow based model for the analysis of vulnerability in power networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 105-115.
    13. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    14. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R. & Rocco S., C.M., 2012. "Identifying groups of critical edges in a realistic electrical network by multi-objective genetic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 172-177.
    15. Mahmoud Saleh & Yusef Esa & Ahmed Mohamed, 2018. "Applications of Complex Network Analysis in Electric Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Kashyap, G. & Ambika, G., 2019. "Link deletion in directed complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 631-643.
    17. Nasiruzzaman, A.B.M. & Pota, H.R. & Akter, Most. Nahida, 2014. "Vulnerability of the large-scale future smart electric power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 11-24.
    18. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 27-38.
    19. Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2022. "Identifying and assessing power system vulnerabilities to transmission asset outages via cascading failure analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:2:p:139-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.