IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v61y2015icp87-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The seafood market in Portugal: Driving forces and consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, Cheila
  • Karadzic, Vanja
  • Vaz, Sofia

Abstract

Portugal has the third highest seafood consumption per capita in the world and current patterns of seafood consumption are linked to how seafood products were embodied in the Portuguese society. The objective of this research is to understand Portuguese seafood consumption's main drivers and its consequences. For that official statistics were analyzed and a literature review on seafood consumption was undertaken. Portuguese seafood consumption is characterized by a wide diversity of species and preparing modes, when compared to other countries in Europe. Cod (salted and dried), does not exist in Portuguese waters but due to several factors, such as politics, religion and tradition, became the main species in Portuguese seafood consumption, representing around 38% of the national seafood demand. Five drivers are suggested to explain why Portuguese eat so much seafood: geography, marine resources, fisheries, social forces and politics; and consequences for the environment, economy and health are discussed. Hence while most dietary recommendations advise an increase in fish consumption is not applicable to Portugal and a more sustainable seafood consumption for the future is advocated.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, Cheila & Karadzic, Vanja & Vaz, Sofia, 2015. "The seafood market in Portugal: Driving forces and consequences," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:61:y:2015:i:c:p:87-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15002134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swartz, Wilf & Rashid Sumaila, U. & Watson, Reg & Pauly, D., 2010. "Sourcing seafood for the three major markets: The EU, Japan and the USA," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1366-1373, November.
    2. Kissinger, Meidad, 2012. "International trade related food miles – The case of Canada," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 171-178.
    3. York, Richard & Gossard, Marcia Hill, 2004. "Cross-national meat and fish consumption: exploring the effects of modernization and ecological context," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 293-302, March.
    4. Olson, Julia & Clay, Patricia M. & Pinto da Silva, Patricia, 2014. "Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 104-111.
    5. Jeffrey A. Hutchings, 2000. "Collapse and recovery of marine fishes," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 882-885, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Valadas Monteiro, 2016. "Managing Scarce Resources and Sensitive Ecosystems: Assessing the Role of CFP in the Development of Portuguese Fisheries," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Sousa, Carlos A.M. & Cunha, Maria Emília & Ribeiro, Laura, 2020. "Tracking 130 years of coastal wetland reclamation in Ria Formosa, Portugal: Opportunities for conservation and aquaculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Adeline Murthy & Alessandro Galli & Catarina Madeira & Sara Moreno Pires, 2023. "Consumer Attitudes towards Fish and Seafood in Portugal: Opportunities for Footprint Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Ana Rita Silva & Diana Boaventura & Vera Sequeira, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Fish Consumption in Portuguese 4th-Grade Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Miriam Aparicio & Ana Maria Costa Silva, 2023. "Careers, Identities and Professionalization. a Study on Doctors about Their Social Representations Related to the Labor Market Today and its Foreseeable Future," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 9, ejis_v9_i.
    6. Sara Apresentação & Mafalda Rangel & Assunção Cristas, 2024. "Towards Sustainability: A Framework for Evaluating Portuguese Small-Scale Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Dina Silva & Eugen Rusu & C. Guedes Soares, 2018. "The Effect of a Wave Energy Farm Protecting an Aquaculture Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjørndal, Trond & Lappo, Alena & Ramos, Jorge, 2015. "An economic analysis of the Portuguese fisheries sector 1960–2011," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Eisenbarth, Sabrina, 2022. "Do exports of renewable resources lead to resource depletion? Evidence from fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Debora Scarpato & Gennaro Civero & Vincenzo Rusciano & Marcello Risitano, 2020. "Sustainable strategies and corporate social responsibility in the Italian fisheries companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2983-2990, November.
    4. Erhardt, Tobias & Weder, Rolf, 2020. "Shark hunting: On the vulnerability of resources with heterogeneous species," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Fiala, Nathan, 2008. "Meeting the demand: An estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 412-419, October.
    6. Kira Lancker & Julia Bronnmann, 2022. "Substitution Preferences for Fish in Senegal," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 1015-1045, August.
    7. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Carlucci, Domenico & De Devitiis, Biagia & Nardone, Gianluca & Viscecchia, Rosaria, 2017. "On consumption patterns in oyster markets: the role of attitudes," MPRA Paper 76789, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Nicky Roberts & Buchari Mengge & Brietta Oaks & Novita Sari & Irsan & Austin Humphries, 2023. "Fish consumption pathways and food security in an Indonesian fishing community," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Isomaa, Marleena & Kaitala, Veijo & Laakso, Jouni, 2013. "Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias) recovery potential under different environment and fishery scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 118-125.
    10. Dana Miller & Stefano Mariani, 2013. "Irish fish, Irish people: roles and responsibilities for an emptying ocean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 529-546, April.
    11. Chantal Le Mouël & Anna Birgit Milford & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Susanne Rolinski, 2019. "Drivers of meat consumption," Post-Print hal-02175593, HAL.
    12. Gabriel Cumming & Kristin Hunter-Thomson & Talia Young, 2020. "Local food 2.0: How do regional, intermediated, food value chains affect stakeholder learning? A case study of a community-supported fishery (CSF) program," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 68-82, March.
    13. Helin, Janne & Weikard, Hans-Peter, 2019. "A model for estimating phosphorus requirements of world food production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Anqi Ren & Xintao Zhao & Qi Liu & Lixingbo Yu & Fengfan Han & Fei Jia & Haochen Hou & Ying Liu, 2023. "Green Supplier Assessment and Selection for Sea Cucumber ( Apostichopus japonicus ) Processing Enterprise: Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Lancker, Kira & Bronmann, Julia, 2020. "Quantifying consumers’ love for marine biodiversity," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304214, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Laurie Richmond & Robert Dumouchel & Henry Pontarelli & Laura Casali & Wyatt Smith & Kathryn Gillick & Pamela Godde & Michelle Dowling & Alyssa Suarez, 2019. "Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Lancker, Kira & Fricke, Lorena & Schmidt, Jörn O., 2019. "Assessing the contribution of artisanal fisheries to food security: A bio-economic modeling approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Jorgenson, Andrew & Birkholz, Ryan, 2010. "Assessing the causes of anthropogenic methane emissions in comparative perspective, 1990-2005," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2634-2643, October.
    19. Biancamaria Torquati & Lucio Cecchini & Chiara Paffarini & Massimo Chiorri, 2021. "The economic and environmental sustainability of extra virgin olive oil supply chains: An analysis based on food miles and value chains," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(1), pages 1-28.
    20. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:61:y:2015:i:c:p:87-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.