IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v69y2017icp102-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can soil-less crop production be a sustainable option for soil conservation and future agriculture?

Author

Listed:
  • Muller, A.
  • Ferré, M.
  • Engel, S.
  • Gattinger, A.
  • Holzkämper, A.
  • Huber, R.
  • Müller, M.
  • Six, J.

Abstract

Agriculture faces huge challenges regarding sustainable use of soils and its sustainability performance in general. There are three different approaches to sustainable agricultural production commonly proposed, namely intensification, agro-ecological approaches and high-tech industrial approaches. Often, some propose that only agro-ecological approaches are truly sustainable options, with particular benefits for soil protection, while others argue that intensification or high-tech performs better through land sparing. In this viewpoint, we scrutinize the notion of “sustainable agricultural production” and the role these approaches may play for such, in particular addressing the controversy of “naturalness” versus “artificiality” in production systems. Consumers often perceive agriculture as “natural”, but agriculture today thrives always on strong human intervention. We posit that agriculture is linked to soils and natural processes, but that this provides little guidance on what sustainable agriculture should be. Being “natural” need not be an aspect of being sustainable. If it is, arguments for this need to be provided. Furthermore, revealed consumer preferences may much less frequently posit being “natural” as a central criterion for food consumed than usually assumed. By all this, we do not want to promote any of those three approaches uncritically. We rather argue for enlarging the option space for sustainable agriculture in an unprejudiced way.

Suggested Citation

  • Muller, A. & Ferré, M. & Engel, S. & Gattinger, A. & Holzkämper, A. & Huber, R. & Müller, M. & Six, J., 2017. "Can soil-less crop production be a sustainable option for soil conservation and future agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 102-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:102-105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483771631376X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Goddek & Boris Delaide & Utra Mankasingh & Kristin Vala Ragnarsdottir & Haissam Jijakli & Ragnheidur Thorarinsdottir, 2015. "Challenges of Sustainable and Commercial Aquaponics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Kees Vringer & Eline van der Heijden & Daan van Soest & Herman Vollebergh & Frank Dietz, 2017. "Sustainable Consumption Dilemmas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Kees Vringer & Eline van der Heijden & Daan van Soest & Herman Vollebergh & Frank Dietz, 2017. "Sustainable Consumption Dilemmas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Kathrin Specht & Rosemarie Siebert & Ina Hartmann & Ulf Freisinger & Magdalena Sawicka & Armin Werner & Susanne Thomaier & Dietrich Henckel & Heike Walk & Axel Dierich, 2014. "Urban agriculture of the future: an overview of sustainability aspects of food production in and on buildings," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(1), pages 33-51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schröter, Iris & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2020. "Bewertung betrieblicher Maßnahmen für eine tierwohlorientierte landwirtschaftliche Tierhaltung der Zukunft durch Landwirt:innen in Deutschland unter Berücksichtigung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305594, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Iris Schröter & Marcus Mergenthaler, 2019. "Neuroeconomics Meets Aquaponics: An Eye-tracking Pilot Study on Perception of Information about Aquaponics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Giulio Flavio Rizzo & Nicolas Al Achkar & Simone Treccarichi & Giuseppe Malgioglio & Matteo Giuseppe Infurna & Sebastian Nigro & Alessandro Tribulato & Ferdinando Branca, 2023. "Use of Bioinoculants Affects Variation in Snap Bean Yield Grown under Deficit Irrigation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Souza, Sulma Vanessa & Gimenes, Régio Marcio Toesca & Binotto, Erlaine, 2019. "Economic viability for deploying hydroponic system in emerging countries: A differentiated risk adjustment proposal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 357-369.
    5. Engler, Nicholas & Krarti, Moncef, 2021. "Review of energy efficiency in controlled environment agriculture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Schröter, Iris & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2020. "Bewertung betrieblicher Maßnahmen für eine tierwohlorientierte landwirtschaftliche Tierhaltung der Zukunft durch Landwirt:innen in Deutschland unter Berücksichtigung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305594, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Ferré, Marie & Muller, Adrian & Leifeld, Jens & Bader, Cédric & Müller, Moritz & Engel, Stefanie & Wichmann, Sabine, 2019. "Sustainable management of cultivated peatlands in Switzerland: Insights, challenges, and opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Dimitra I. Pomoni & Maria K. Koukou & Michail Gr. Vrachopoulos & Labros Vasiliadis, 2023. "A Review of Hydroponics and Conventional Agriculture Based on Energy and Water Consumption, Environmental Impact, and Land Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Mina, Giorgio & Peira, Giovanni & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2023. "Public perception and social sustainability of indoor farming technologies: A systematic review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Dsouza, Ajwal & Newman, Lenore & Graham, Thomas & Fraser, Evan D.G., 2023. "Exploring the landscape of controlled environment agriculture research: A systematic scoping review of trends and topics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Kaya, Asli & Erturk, Hakan & Yalcin, Refet Ali, 2024. "Energy efficiency of solar illuminated vertical farms with different illumination strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Jeb S. Fields & James S. Owen & Alexa Lamm & James Altland & Brian Jackson & Lorence Oki & Jayesh B. Samtani & Youbin Zheng & Kristopher S. Criscione, 2023. "Surveying North American Specialty Crop Growers’ Current Use of Soilless Substrates and Future Research and Education Needs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Heino Pesch & Louis Louw, 2023. "Evaluating the Economic Feasibility of Plant Factory Scenarios That Produce Biomass for Biorefining Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-36, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Böhm, Robert & Letmathe, Peter & Schinner, Matthias, 2023. "The monetary value of competencies: A novel method and case study in smart manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Vringer, Kees & Carabain, Christine L., 2020. "Measuring the legitimacy of energy transition policy in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Luigi Cembalo & Daniela Caso & Valentina Carfora & Francesco Caracciolo & Alessia Lombardi & Gianni Cicia, 2019. "The “Land of Fires” Toxic Waste Scandal and Its Effect on Consumer Food Choices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Ualison Rébula de Oliveira & Thaís Stiegert Meireles Gomes & Geovani Gabizo de Oliveira & Júlio Cesar Andrade de Abreu & Murilo Alvarenga Oliveira & Aldara da Silva César & Vicente Aprigliano Fernande, 2022. "Systematic Literature Review on Sustainable Consumption from the Perspective of Companies, People and Public Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Katarzyna Mazur-Włodarczyk & Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska, 2022. "Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Jakučionytė-Skodienė, Miglė & Liobikienė, Genovaitė, 2023. "Changes in energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the Lithuanian household sector caused by environmental awareness and climate change policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Ben Groom & Zachary Turk, 2021. "Reflections on the Dasgupta Review on the Economics of Biodiversity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(1), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Gerrit Antonides, 2017. "Sustainable Consumer Behaviour: A Collection of Empirical Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-5, September.
    9. N. E. Terent’ev, 2021. "Climate Change as a Factor in the Development of Companies: Corporate Strategies and Guidelines for State Industrial Policy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 485-491, September.
    10. Yunjie Liu & Qiang Jin & Bo Wen & Zhibao Huo & Yuanhang Zhu & Minghai Zhang & Zhili Wang & Aidang Shan, 2020. "The economic and environmental assessment on production stage of quayside crane," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 2759-2778, April.
    11. Dongnyok Shim & Jungwoo Shin & So‐Yoon Kwak, 2018. "Modelling the consumer decision‐making process to identify key drivers and bottlenecks in the adoption of environmentally friendly products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1409-1421, December.
    12. Jungwoo Shin & Suna Kang & Donghyun Lee & Bum Il Hong, 2018. "Analysing the failure factors of eco‐friendly home appliances based on a user‐centered approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1399-1408, December.
    13. Quevedo Cascante, Mónica & Acosta García, Nicolás & Fold, Niels, 2022. "The role of external forces in the adoption of aquaculture innovations: An ex-ante case study of fish farming in Colombia's southern Amazonian region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Nurhayati Br Tarigan & Simon Goddek & Karel J. Keesman, 2021. "Explorative Study of Aquaponics Systems in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Leena Erälinna & Barbara Szymoniuk, 2021. "Managing a Circular Food System in Sustainable Urban Farming. Experimental Research at the Turku University Campus (Finland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Montero, J.I. & Baeza, E. & Heuvelink, E. & Rieradevall, J. & Muñoz, P. & Ercilla, M. & Stanghellini, C., 2017. "Productivity of a building-integrated roof top greenhouse in a Mediterranean climate," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 14-22.
    17. Devi Buehler & Ranka Junge, 2016. "Global Trends and Current Status of Commercial Urban Rooftop Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Michael Martin & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of an Urban Vertical Hydroponic Farming System in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Muhammad Mumtaz Khan & Muhammad Tahir Akram & Rhonda Janke & Rashad Waseem Khan Qadri & Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi & Aitazaz A. Farooque, 2020. "Urban Horticulture for Food Secure Cities through and beyond COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Mireia Ercilla-Montserrat & David Sanjuan-Delmás & Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Laura Calvet-Mir & Karla Banderas & Joan Rieradevall & Xavier Gabarrell, 2019. "Analysis of the consumer’s perception of urban food products from a soilless system in rooftop greenhouses: a case study from the Mediterranean area of Barcelona (Spain)," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(3), pages 375-393, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:102-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.