IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2318-d1006623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inconsistencies in Cadastral Boundary Data—Digitisation and Maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Bujar Fetai

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jernej Tekavec

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Mojca Kosmatin Fras

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Anka Lisec

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Most cadastral systems today are coordinate-based and contain only a weak or no reference to measurements or the origin of the information. In some contexts, this is largely due to the transition of land data management and maintenance from an analogue to a digital environment. This study focuses on analysing the importance of the measurement-based cadastre and the digitisation process in North Macedonia and Slovenia. The survey-based boundary data and their integration into the digital environment were not considered in either case study. The positional differences between the survey-based boundary coordinates and the graphical coordinates of the boundaries are significant. The RMSE(2D) for Trebosh was 48 cm, and the RMSE(2D) for Ivanjševci was 56 cm. Consequently, the differences in location affected the areas of the cadastral parcels, resulting in an RMSE of 26 m 2 and 23 m 2 for Trebosh and Ivanjševci, respectively. These differences can be considered as differences within the cadastral boundary data. Therefore, before harmonising the data between the cadastre and the land register, the inconsistencies within the cadastral data should be eliminated first. The differences in the location of cadastral boundaries and parcel area create new challenges in cadastral procedures (formatting of parcels), conflicts in the relocation of boundaries, and impacts on the land market. The solution lies in the way data is maintained, avoiding duplication of attributes or eliminating inconsistencies (after duplication). Both solutions require further modifications of the legal framework for cadastral procedures related to boundary adjustments and data compliance. This study provides a basis for evaluating inconsistencies in cadastral data and highlights the importance of proper source data selection in the digitization process.

Suggested Citation

  • Bujar Fetai & Jernej Tekavec & Mojca Kosmatin Fras & Anka Lisec, 2022. "Inconsistencies in Cadastral Boundary Data—Digitisation and Maintenance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2318-:d:1006623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Doris Pivac & Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Rinaldo Paar, 2021. "Availability of Historical Cadastral Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Yildiz, Umit & Gürel, Murat & Kocaman, Sultan, 2022. "State liability and uncertainty perception on cadastral parcel area registry in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan & Ejaz Hussain & Zahir Ali & Jaap Zevenbergen & Salman Atif & Mila Koeva & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Metaferia, Mekonnen Tesfaye & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Alemie, Berhanu Kefale & Koeva, Mila, 2023. "The peri-urban cadastre of Addis Ababa: Status, challenges, and fit-for-purpose prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Simon Hull & Harold Liversage & Maria Paola Rizzo & Vladimir Evtimov, 2022. "An Overview of Frontier Technologies for Land Tenure: How to Avoid the Hype and Focus on What Matters," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Shewakena Aytenfisu Abab & Feyera Senbeta & Tamirat Tefera Negash, 2023. "The Effect of Policy and Technological Innovations of Land Tenure on Small Landholders’ Credit-Worthiness: Evidence from Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Elena Bykowa & Maria Skachkova & Ivan Raguzin & Irina Dyachkova & Maxim Boltov, 2022. "Automation of Negative Infrastructural Externalities Assessment Methods to Determine the Cost of Land Resources Based on the Development of a “Thin Client” Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J. & Heldeweg, Michiel A., 2022. "Safety and privacy regulations for unmanned aerial vehicles: A multiple comparative analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. repec:zib:zbmbmj:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:53-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ansah, Barikisa Owusu & Voss, Winrich & Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Wuni, Ibrahim Yahaya, 2023. "A systematic review of the institutional success factors for blockchain-based land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Pierre-François Blin & Trias Aditya & Purnama Budi Santosa & Christophe Claramunt, 2023. "A Methodological Approach towards Cyber Risk Management in Land Administrations Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    15. Yildiz, Umit & Gürel, Murat & Kocaman, Sultan, 2022. "State liability and uncertainty perception on cadastral parcel area registry in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Mekonnen Tesfaye Metaferia & Rohan Mark Bennett & Berhanu Kefale Alemie & Mila Koeva, 2022. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2021. "Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Çağdaş, Volkan & Kara, Abdullah & Lisec, Anka & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Skovsgaard, Tanja L. & Velasco, Amalia, 2023. "Determination of the property boundary – A review of selected civil law jurisdictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Jahani Chehrehbargh, Fatemeh & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Steudler, Daniel, 2024. "Identifying global parameters for advancing Land Administration Systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    20. Rohan Mark Bennett & Jerome Donovan & Eryadi Masli & Kirsikka Riekkinen, 2023. "Land Administration As-A-Service: Relevance, Applications, and Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    21. Efthimios Bakogiannis & Chryssy Potsiou & Konstantinos Apostolopoulos & Charalampos Kyriakidis, 2021. "Crowdsourced Geospatial Infrastructure for Coastal Management and Planning for Emerging Post COVID-19 Tourism Demand," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2318-:d:1006623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.