IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v114y2022ics0264837722000175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success factors in cadastral boundary settlements based on land surveyor’s opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Golob, Peter
  • Lisec, Anka

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to theoretically and empirically explore the success factors in cadastral parcel boundary settlements. Our focus was to study the role of landowners in boundary settlements and dispute management. The issue of landowners’ involvement is highly topical and complex, as the number of disputes stemming from indeterminate landowners’ roles in managing cadastral boundaries and indeterminate roles of the land surveyor as the mediator are considerable. These disputes can be a heavy burden for the country and society as a whole. Our basic research question was very widely set so that the model of success factors of boundary settlements following land cadastre data would go beyond the geodetic and legal framework and would also cover socio-psychological factors. In the literature, this topic is still not addressed, although there are several scientific questions related to it, the focus being on the integration of sociological and psychological factors into the field of spatial management. Based on the opinions of authorised land surveyors, we found for the case of Slovenia that the success of boundary settlement is, along with engineering and property aspects, also influenced by socio-psychological factors. The following factors were found to be essential: previously marked boundaries, preliminary analysis, clear explanation, surveyor’s expertise and communication skills, neighbourly relations between landowners, (psychological) attachment to land, and other personality traits of landowners. Generally, it was found that the surveying procedure and the land surveyor are the most important factors of success in boundary settlements, closely followed by the landowner, while the land data (cadastral data) is the least important factor. We also found that the land surveyor influences the landowner and how the factors related to the landowner will reflect upon the success of the boundary settlement; this confirmed that the land surveyor and the landowner are the most important factors of success in cadastral parcel boundary settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Golob, Peter & Lisec, Anka, 2022. "Success factors in cadastral boundary settlements based on land surveyor’s opinions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722000175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cemellini, Barbara & van Oosterom, Peter & Thompson, Rod & de Vries, Marian, 2020. "Design, development and usability testing of an LADM compliant 3D Cadastral prototype system," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Arruñada, Benito, 2018. "Evolving practice in land demarcation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 661-675.
    3. Julian Agyeman & Patrick Devine-Wright & Julia Prange, 2009. "Close to the Edge, down by the River? Joining up Managed Retreat and Place Attachment in a Climate Changed World," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(3), pages 509-513, March.
    4. Indrajit, Agung & van Loenen, Bastiaan & Ploeger, Hendrik & van Oosterom, Peter, 2020. "Developing a spatial planning information package in ISO 19152 land administration domain model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Larsson, Karolina & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2020. "Representation of 3D cadastral boundaries - From analogue to digital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çağdaş, Volkan & Kara, Abdullah & Lisec, Anka & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Skovsgaard, Tanja L. & Velasco, Amalia, 2023. "Determination of the property boundary – A review of selected civil law jurisdictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Ayelech Kidie Mengesha & Thomas Bauer & Doris Damyanovic & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger & Gernot Stoeglehner, 2022. "Gender Analysis of Landholding and Situation of Female-Headed Households after Land Registration: The Case of Machakel Woreda," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kara, Abdullah & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter & Kalogianni, Eftychia & Alattas, Abdullah & Indrajit, Agung, 2024. "Design of the new structure and capabilities of LADM edition II including 3D aspects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Fatih Döner & Samet Şirin, 2020. "3D Digital Representation of Cadastral Data in Turkey—Apartments Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Tubridy, Fiadh & Lennon, Mick & Scott, Mark, 2022. "Managed retreat and coastal climate change adaptation: The environmental justice implications and value of a coproduction approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen & Meichen Fu, 2024. "A Review of Research on the Value Evaluation of Urban Underground Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Graham, Sonia & Barnett, Jon & Mortreux, Colette & Hurlimann, Anna & Fincher, Ruth, 2018. "Local values and fairness in climate change adaptation: Insights from marginal rural Australian communities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 332-343.
    10. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Idowu Ajibade, 2019. "Planned retreat in Global South megacities: disentangling policy, practice, and environmental justice," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 299-317, November.
    13. Shin, Jihye & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2022. "A BIM-based framework for property dispute minimization – A case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Andrew L. Dannenberg & Howard Frumkin & Jeremy J. Hess & Kristie L. Ebi, 2019. "Managed retreat as a strategy for climate change adaptation in small communities: public health implications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Christina Hanna & Iain White & Bruce Glavovic, 2020. "The Uncertainty Contagion: Revealing the Interrelated, Cascading Uncertainties of Managed Retreat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. LAI, Lawrence W.C. & DAVIES, Stephen N.G. & CHAU, K.W. & CHOY, Lennon H.T. & CHUA, Mark H. & LAM, Terry K.W., 2022. "A centennial literature review (1919–2019) of research publications on land readjustment from a neo-institutional economic perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Aditya, Trias & Sucaya, I Ketut Gede Ary & Nugroho Adi, Fajar, 2021. "LADM-compliant field data collector for cadastral surveyors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Indrajit, Agung & van Loenen, Bastiaan & Suprajaka, & Jaya, Virgo Eresta & Ploeger, Hendrik & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Implementation of the spatial plan information package for improving ease of doing business in Indonesian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Cynthia A. Grace-McCaskey & Susan C. Pearce & Lynn Harris & Mamadi Corra & Kayla J. Evans, 2021. "Finding voices in the floods of Freedom Hill: innovating solutions in Princeville, North Carolina," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 341-351, September.
    20. Celia McMichael & Teresia Powell, 2021. "Planned Relocation and Health: A Case Study from Fiji," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.