IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v129y2023ics0264837723001321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of mechanized technology adoption in smallholder agriculture: Implications for agricultural policy

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed, Kamaldeen
  • Batung, Evans
  • Saaka, Sulemana Ansumah
  • Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri
  • Luginaah, Isaac

Abstract

Agricultural mechanization is viewed as a tool for transforming agriculture in the Global South. Despite gaining traction among governments across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), with many countries now having dedicated agricultural mechanization subsidy programs, recent evidence shows that adoption is not universal among farmers. While adoption of mechanized agriculture is generally theorized as an outcome of the interaction of cultural, political, ecological, and socioeconomic factors, little is known about the specific factors that may be driving ongoing differences in the adoption of mechanized agricultural technologies by smallholder farmers in semi-arid Ghana. Using a cross-sectional survey (n = 1100) with smallholder farmers, we explored the determinants of the adoption of mechanized technologies. Results from the logistic regression analysis indicate that remittances (OR=12.27; P < 0.001), access to formal (OR=4.27; P < 0.001) and informal (OR=9.65; P < 0.001) credit, farm labor (OR=0.88; P < 0.01), farm size (OR=1.83; P < 0.001) and local agricultural information sources (OR=0.50; P < 0.01), emerged as significant correlates of mechanized technology adoption among smallholder farmers. The standardized beta coefficients further revealed that access to credit and remittances were the strongest predictors of mechanized technology adoption. These findings highlight the potentially strong role of economic factors in shaping mechanized technology adoption in smallholder farming contexts. Coupled with the fact that a significant proportion of farmers are yet to adopt these technologies, there is a need to rethink the agricultural transformation agenda of governments. There are two potential ways to address the needs of poorer farming households who are unable to afford mechanized technologies: the introduction of more subsidies and the promotion of alternative low-cost techniques of food production. However, given the failure of existing mechanization packages to benefit many farmers, governments need to simultaneously promote alternative production methods like agroecology which do not rely on mechanized technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed, Kamaldeen & Batung, Evans & Saaka, Sulemana Ansumah & Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri & Luginaah, Isaac, 2023. "Determinants of mechanized technology adoption in smallholder agriculture: Implications for agricultural policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:129:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001321
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723001321
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uttam Khanal & Khorshed Alam & Ramesh C. Khanal & Punya P. Regmi, 2015. "Implications of out-migration in rural agriculture: a case study of Manapang village, Tanahun, Nepal," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(1), pages 331-352, January-M.
    2. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Monica Owusu Acheampong, 2019. "Capital and credit constraints in the engagement of youth in Ghanaian agriculture," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 80(1), pages 22-37, October.
    3. Clay, Nathan & Zimmerer, Karl S., 2020. "Who is resilient in Africa’s Green Revolution? Sustainable intensification and Climate Smart Agriculture in Rwanda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Ngeleza, Guyslain K. & Owusua, Rebecca & Jimah, Kipo & Kolavalli, Shashidhara, 2011. "Cropping practices and labor requirements in field operations for major crops in Ghana: What needs to be mechanized?," IFPRI discussion papers 1074, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Das, Prabir & Saha, Jay & Chouhan, Pradip, 2020. "Effects of labor out-migration on socio-economic set-up at the place of origin: Evidence from rural India," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Hamdiyah Alhassan & Benjamin Musah Abu & Paul Kwame Nkegbe, 2020. "Access to Credit, Farm Productivity and Market Participation in Ghana: A Conditional Mixed Process Approach," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 226-246, May.
    7. Akramov, Kamiljon T. & Malek, Mehrab, 2012. "Analyzing profitability of maize, rice, and soybean production in Ghana: Results of PAM and DEA analysis," GSSP working papers 28, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Philip Antwi-Agyei & Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong, 2021. "Evidence of Climate Change Coping and Adaptation Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Northern Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Kamaldeen Mohammed & Evans Batung & Moses Kansanga & Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong & Isaac Luginaah, 2021. "Livelihood diversification strategies and resilience to climate change in semi-arid northern Ghana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Daniel Kpienbaareh & Kamaldeen Mohammed & Isaac Luginaah & Jinfei Wang & Rachel Bezner Kerr & Esther Lupafya & Laifolo Dakishoni, 2022. "Estimating Groundnut Yield in Smallholder Agriculture Systems Using PlanetScope Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Belton, Ben & Win, Myat Thida & Zhang, Xiaobo & Filipski, Mateusz, 2021. "The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Diao, Xinshen & Agandin, John & Fang, Peixun & Justice, Scott E. & Kufoalor, Doreen S. & Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2018. "Agricultural mechanization in Ghana: Insights from a recent field study:," IFPRI discussion papers 1729, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Paudel, Gokul P. & KC, Dilli Bahadur & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Khanal, Narayan P. & Justice, Scott E. & McDonald, Andrew J., 2019. "Smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for scale-appropriate farm mechanization: Evidence from the mid-hills of Nepal," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Atuoye, Kilian Nasung & Luginaah, Isaac, 2017. "Food as a social determinant of mental health among household heads in the Upper West Region of Ghana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 170-180.
    15. Samuel Sekyi & Benjamin Musah Abu & Paul Kwame Nkegbe, 2020. "Effects of farm credit access on agricultural commercialization in Ghana: Empirical evidence from the northern Savannah ecological zone," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 150-162, June.
    16. Adu-Baffour, Ferdinand & Daum, Thomas & Birner, Regina, 2019. "Can small farms benefit from big companies’ initiatives to promote mechanization in Africa? A case study from Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 133-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huwei Wen & Yulin Huang & Jiayi Shi, 2024. "Revitalizing Agricultural Economy Through Rural E-Commerce? Experience from China’s Revolutionary Old Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Mohammed, Kamaldeen & Batung, Evans & Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri & Luginaah, Isaac, 2024. "Alcohol misuse as a social determinant of food insecurity among smallholder farmers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    3. Cornelius K. A. Pienaah & Evans Batung & Suleman Ansumah Saaka & Kamaldeen Mohammed & Isaac Luginaah, 2023. "Early Warnings and Perceived Climate Change Preparedness among Smallholder Farmers in the Upper West Region of Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Zhenbang Ma & Huichun Sun, 2024. "Harnessing the Power of Mechanization: A Multivalued Treatment Effect Analysis on Productivity for Chinese Smallholders," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Fang, Dan & Chen, Jiangqiang & Wang, Saige & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Can agricultural mechanization enhance the climate resilience of food production? Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    6. Manxi Sun & Yuan Wan & Shuang Wang & Jian Liang & Hong Hu & Li Cheng, 2024. "Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Mechanization on the Economic Efficiency of Maize Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Sha, Zhouhao & Ren, Dong & Li, Chengyou & Wang, Zeru, 2024. "Agricultural subsidies on common prosperity: Evidence from the Chinese social survey," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Yuan Hu & Ziyang Zhou & Li Zhou & Caiming Liu, 2024. "Self-Owned or Outsourced? The Impact of Farm Machinery Adoption Decisions on Chinese Farm Households’ Operating Income," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Hongyun Zheng & Love Offeibea Asiedu-Ayeh & Anthony Siaw & Yuansheng Jiang, 2023. "Access to Financial Services and Its Impact on Household Income: Evidence from Rural Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(4), pages 869-890, August.
    3. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. Grabowski, Philip & Jayne, Thom, 2016. "Analyzing Trends in Herbicide Use in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Security International Development Working Papers 245909, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Saeed Ur Rahman & Zia Ur Rahman & Aabera Atta & Faiza Afzal, 2022. "An Implication of Impulse Response Function in the Perspective of Green Revolution, Credit Disbursement, and Fossil Fuel Utilization in Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(2), pages 58-64.
    6. Meng, Meng & Zhang, Wuke & Zhu, Xi & Shi, Qinghua, 2024. "Agricultural mechanization and rural worker mobility: Evidence from the Agricultural Machinery Purchase Subsidies programme in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Diao, Xinshen & Cossar, Frances & Houssou, Nazaire & Kolavalli, Shashidhara, 2014. "Mechanization in Ghana: Emerging demand, and the search for alternative supply models," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 168-181.
    8. Tao Chen & Muhammad Rizwan & Azhar Abbas, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Agricultural Services in Production Efficiency in Chinese Agriculture: A Case of the Socialized Agricultural Service System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Kansanga, Moses & Andersen, Peter & Atuoye, Kilian & Mason-Renton, Sarah, 2018. "Contested commons: Agricultural modernization, tenure ambiguities and intra-familial land grabbing in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 215-224.
    10. repec:ags:aaea22:335478 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Paudel, Gokul P. & Gartaula, Hom & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Craufurd, Peter, 2020. "Gender differentiated small-scale farm mechanization in Nepal hills: An application of exogenous switching treatment regression," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Cornelius K. A. Pienaah & Evans Batung & Suleman Ansumah Saaka & Kamaldeen Mohammed & Isaac Luginaah, 2023. "Early Warnings and Perceived Climate Change Preparedness among Smallholder Farmers in the Upper West Region of Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. LoPiccalo, Katherine, 2022. "Impact of broadband penetration on U.S. Farm productivity: A panel approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    15. Kamaldeen Mohammed & Evans Batung & Moses Kansanga & Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong & Isaac Luginaah, 2021. "Livelihood diversification strategies and resilience to climate change in semi-arid northern Ghana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Selorm Yaotse Dorvlo & Elizabeth Mkandawire & Katy Roelich & Charles Blessings Jumbe, 2023. "Pathways and Interactions for Integrating Mechanisation into Sustainable Agricultural Production: The Case of Rice Production in Asutsuare, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Peele, Morgan & Wolf, Sharon, 2020. "Predictors of anxiety and depressive symptoms among teachers in Ghana: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    18. Martey, E., 2018. "Heterogeneous Demand for Quality Soybean in Northern Ghana," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277013, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Diao, Xinshen, 2013. "Agricultural mechanization patterns in Nigeria: Insights from farm household typology and agricultural household model simulation:," IFPRI discussion papers 1291, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Khun, Channary & Lim, Sokchea, 2023. "Productivity and market participation: Cambodian rice farmers," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    21. Chapoto, Antony & Ragasa, Catherine, 2013. "Moving in the right direction? Maize productivity and fertilizer use and use intensity in Ghana:," IFPRI discussion papers 1314, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:129:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.