IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v108y2021ics0264837721002659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Janus, Jarosław
  • Ertunç, Ela

Abstract

Land fragmentation is a primary cause of low agricultural profitability in many regions of the world. Adverse fragmentation parameters can be improved with land consolidation projects. Such projects are undertaken in areas characterised by different initial parameters of land fragmentation, types of agriculture, sociocultural conditions, and legislation that provides the framework for their formal and procedural implementation. All these aspects should affect not only the effectiveness of the projects but also how they are evaluated depending on the local circumstances. The paper presents results of the assessment of identified differences in land consolidation project effectiveness in the context of legal and sociocultural conditions. The research involved eight land consolidation projects carried out in Poland and Turkey. The countries have similar structures of agriculture and are conducting ongoing, long-term land consolidation schemes. The results are indicative of the necessity to differentiate assessment criteria depending on the location of a project and its primary goal. The application of popular land fragmentation indices could, in particular, lead to incorrect assessment of whether a project was successful when it was not intended to result in a significant increase in parcel area and reduction of the number of parcels. The research shows that it is possible to compare the effectiveness of projects from different countries provided that the process takes into consideration differences in local conditions affecting the development of agriculture and legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2021. "Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:108:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721002659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721002659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tongur, Vahit & Ertunc, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2020. "Use of the Migrating Birds Optimization (MBO) Algorithm in solving land distribution problem," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Looga, J. & Jürgenson, E. & Sikk, K. & Matveev, E. & Maasikamäe, S., 2018. "Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity: The case of Estonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 285-292.
    3. Dudzińska, Małgorzata & Bacior, Stanisław & Prus, Barbara, 2018. "Considering the level of socio-economic development of rural areas in the context of infrastructural and traditional consolidations in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 759-773.
    4. Yurui, Li & Yi, Li & Pengcan, Fan & Hualou, Long, 2019. "Impacts of land consolidation on rural human–environment system in typical watershed of the Loess Plateau and implications for rural development policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 339-350.
    5. Heider, Katharina & Rodriguez Lopez, Juan Miguel & García Avilés, José María & Balbo, Andrea L., 2018. "Land fragmentation index for drip-irrigated field systems in the Mediterranean: A case study from Ricote (Murcia, SE Spain)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 48-56.
    6. E. Yaslioglu & S. T. Akkaya Aslan & M. Kirmikil & K. S. Gundogdu & I. Arici, 2009. "Changes in Farm Management and Agricultural Activities and Their Effect on Farmers' Satisfaction from Land Consolidation: The Case of Bursa--Karacabey, Turkey," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 327-340, February.
    7. Colombo, Sergio & Perujo-Villanueva, Manuel, 2019. "A practical method for the ex-ante evaluation of land consolidation initiatives: Fully connected parcels with the same value," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 463-471.
    8. Ertunç, Ela & Çay, Tayfun & Haklı, Hüseyin, 2018. "Modeling of reallocation in land consolidation with a hybrid method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 754-761.
    9. Wojewodzic, Tomasz & Janus, Jaroslaw & Dacko, Mariusz & Pijanowski, Jacek & Taszakowski, Jaroslaw, 2021. "Measuring the effectiveness of land consolidation: An economic approach based on selected case studies from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Akkaya Aslan, Serife Tulin & Kirmikil, Muge & Gündoğdu, Kemal Sulhi & Arici, Ismet, 2018. "Reallocation model for land consolidation based on landowners’ requests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 463-470.
    11. Krupowicz, Wioleta & Czarnecka, Adrianna & Grus, Magdalena, 2020. "Implementing crowdsourcing initiatives in land consolidation procedures in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Wójcik-Leń, Justyna & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Sajnóg, Natalia & Leń, Przemysław, 2018. "The idea of rational management of problematic agricultural areas in the course of land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 36-45.
    13. Lu, Hua & Xie, Hualin & He, Yafen & Wu, Zhilong & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Assessing the impacts of land fragmentation and plot size on yields and costs: A translog production model and cost function approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 81-88.
    14. Harun Tanrivermis & Yesim Aliefendioglu, 2019. "Socio-economic Impact Assessment of Land Consolidation Projects in Turkey: A Case Study of Beyazaltn Village Land Consolidation Project in Eskiehir Province, Turkey," ERES eres2019_357, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goran Marinković & Zoran Ilić & Milan Trifković & Jelena Tatalović & Marko Božić, 2022. "Optimization Methods as a Base for Decision Making in Land Consolidation Projects Ranking," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Jian Zhou & Chao Li & Xiaotong Chu & Chenying Luo, 2022. "Is Cultivated Land Increased by Land Consolidation Sustainably Used in Mountainous Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Minjuan Lv & Zhiting Chen & Lingling Yao & Xiaohu Dang & Peng Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2022. "Potential Zoning of Construction Land Consolidation in the Loess Plateau Based on the Evolution of Human–Land Relationship," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Yaoben Lin & Danling Chen, 2022. "Functional Zoning and Path Selection of Land Comprehensive Consolidation Based on Grey Constellation Clustering: A Case Study of Dongying City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Li, Hanbing & Jin, Xiaobin & McCormick, Barbara Prack & Tittonell, Pablo & Liu, Jing & Han, Bo & Sun, Rui & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Analysis of the contribution of land consolidation to sustainable poverty alleviation under various natural conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Wang, Ge & Li, Xiaoqiu & Gao, Yingjie & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Bingkun & Li, Xiangyu & Li, Xintong, 2023. "How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Wang, Liye & Zhang, Siyu & Xiong, Qiangqiang & Liu, Yu & Liu, Yanfang & Liu, Yaolin, 2022. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of cropland expansion and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A nuanced analysis at the county scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Zofia Kuzevicova & Diana Bobikova & Stefan Kuzevic & Samer Khouri, 2021. "Changes in the Country and Their Impact on Topographic Data of Agricultural Land—A Case Study of Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2022. "Towards a full automation of land consolidation projects: Fast land partitioning algorithm using the land value map," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Janus, Jaroslaw & Markuszewska, Iwona, 2019. "Forty years later: Assessment of the long-lasting effectiveness of land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 22-31.
    3. Wang, Ge & Li, Xiaoqiu & Gao, Yingjie & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Bingkun & Li, Xiangyu & Li, Xintong, 2023. "How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Wojewodzic, Tomasz & Janus, Jaroslaw & Dacko, Mariusz & Pijanowski, Jacek & Taszakowski, Jaroslaw, 2021. "Measuring the effectiveness of land consolidation: An economic approach based on selected case studies from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Bahar, Sevgi Kesici & Kirmikil, Müge, 2021. "The evaluation of agricultural landowner inputs before and after land consolidation: The Kesik Village example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Zang, Yuzhu & Yang, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Toward serving land consolidation on the table of sustainability: An overview of the research landscape and future directions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Heinrichs, J. & Kuhn, T. & Pahmeyer, C. & Britz, W., 2021. "Economic effects of plot sizes and farm-plot distances in organic and conventional farming systems: A farm-level analysis for Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Gatterer, Markus & Leonhardt, Heidi & Salhofer, Klaus & Morawetz, Ulrich, 2024. "The legacy of partible inheritance on farmland fragmentation: Evidence from Austria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Dongjie Wang & Hao Yang & Yueming Hu & A-Xing Zhu & Xiaoyun Mao, 2022. "Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Cultivated Land Fragmentation and Their Influencing Factors in a Rapidly Developing Region: A Case Study in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Pham Phuong Nam & Bui Nguyen Hanh & Phan Thi Thanh Huyen & Nguyen Le Thuc Anh & Duong Thuy Ninh, 2023. "Accumulation and Concentration of Agricultural Land: A Case Study in Gia Binh District, Bac Ninh Province, Vietnam," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 761-776, July.
    11. Yan, Jinming & Zhang, Dongsheng & Xia, Fangzhou, 2021. "Evaluation of village land use planning risks in green concepts: The case of Qiwangfen Village in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    12. Zang, Liangzhen & Araral, Eduardo & Wang, Yahua, 2019. "Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons: Theory and evidence from 284 villages and 17 provinces in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 518-527.
    13. Xu, Weiyi & Jin, Xiaobin & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "Analysis of influencing factors of cultivated land fragmentation based on hierarchical linear model: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Meng Wang & Qingchen Xu & Zemeng Fan & Xiaofang Sun, 2021. "The Imprint of Built-Up Land Expansion on Cropland Distribution and Productivity in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Tunalı, Safiye Pınar & Dağdelen, Necdet, 2023. "Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Orea, Luis & Perez-Mendez, Jose A., 2019. "Rural and agricultural development by land consolidation: a spatial production analysis of Asturias´ parishes," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/04, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    17. Shukun Wang & Dengwang Li & Tingting Li & Changquan Liu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions and Farm Performance in China: A Perspective of Land Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Zhang, Xiaobin & de Vries, Walter Timo & Li, Guan & Ye, Yanmei & Zheng, Hongyu & Wang, Mengran, 2019. "A behavioral analysis of farmers during land reallocation processes of land consolidation in China: Insights from Guangxi and Shandong provinces," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Ye, Sijing & Ren, Shuyi & Song, Changqing & Du, Zhenbo & Wang, Kuangxu & Du, Bin & Cheng, Feng & Zhu, Dehai, 2024. "Spatial pattern of cultivated land fragmentation in mainland China: Characteristics, dominant factors, and countermeasures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Inceyol, Yasar & Cay, Tayfun, 2022. "Comparison of traditional method and genetic algorithm optimization in the land reallocation stage of land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:108:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721002659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.