IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v81y2023ics0301420722007231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a conceptual framework to evaluate factors that affect drivers for stakeholder engagement in mine waste management

Author

Listed:
  • Manjengwa, Evelyn Ruvimbo
  • Dorfling, Christie
  • Tadie, Margreth

Abstract

Investment in mining related projects is driven by the value that is placed upon the project by stakeholders. This value is a function of the perception or drivers that such stakeholders have of the mining project. The viewpoint a stakeholder has of a mining related project is a function of different factors and the combination of external influences that interact with an individual's motivating drives. Long standing debates such as the impacts on the economy and influence on the geopolitics on a local, national, regional and international scale are considered. As a result, the stakeholder viewpoint of the mining industry varies across different stakeholder groups. In the development of quantitatively based frameworks for informing discourse and providing decision support on mining related projects, it is useful to be able to capture these nuances in a way that enables clear evaluation of stakeholder perceptions/viewpoints/drivers. The VAT framework supported by it complementary tool developed in Microsoft Excel was proposed. The VAT Microsoft Excel tool forms the heart of the framework. It provides a means to combine different factors that affect stakeholders' perception of large-scale capital projects quantitatively. The VAT Microsoft Excel tool was developed in four steps, the identification of themes relating to viewpoints in mining related literature (1999–2019), identification of stakeholders and their expectations, definition of the determinants of value and their constituent elements and finally, the development of a quantitative Value Analysis Tree (VAT) framework Microsoft tool. The usefulness of the approach was illustrated using data and likely predictions of stakeholder responses based on four hypothetical company cases of a tailings reprocessing project. The approach is unique and provides a strong backbone for further use, for example in understanding decision making from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjengwa, Evelyn Ruvimbo & Dorfling, Christie & Tadie, Margreth, 2023. "Development of a conceptual framework to evaluate factors that affect drivers for stakeholder engagement in mine waste management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s0301420722007231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722007231
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bistra Boeva, 2015. "Corporate Governance and Global Supply Chains: How Self -regulation Replaces the Lack of Regulatory Initiatives or Do Regulatory Initiatives Add Value to Corporate Governance," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 5-19, December.
    2. Mancini, Lucia & Sala, Serenella, 2018. "Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-111.
    3. Borysiewicz, Mieczysław & Kowal, Karol & Potempski, Sławomir, 2015. "An application of the value tree analysis methodology within the integrated risk informed decision making for the nuclear facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 113-119.
    4. Heng Yi Teah & Motoharu Onuki, 2017. "Support Phosphorus Recycling Policy with Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Case of Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Stephen J. Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 435-455, May.
    6. Michael N. Young & Mike W. Peng & David Ahlstrom & Garry D. Bruton & Yi Jiang, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal–Principal Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 196-220, January.
    7. Sara Bice, 2014. "What Gives You a Social Licence? An Exploration of the Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Mining Industry," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Frederiksen, Tomas, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility, risk and development in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 495-505.
    9. Graymore, Michelle L.M. & Sipe, Neil G. & Rickson, Roy E., 2008. "Regional sustainability: How useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 362-372, October.
    10. Juliana Segura-Salazar & Luís Marcelo Tavares, 2018. "Sustainability in the Minerals Industry: Seeking a Consensus on Its Meaning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-38, May.
    11. Cyrlene Claasen & Julia Roloff, 2012. "The Link Between Responsibility and Legitimacy: The Case of De Beers in Namibia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 379-398, May.
    12. Lyons, Margaret & Bartlett, Jennifer & McDonald, Paula, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility in junior and mid-tier resources companies operating in developing nations – beyond the public relations offensive," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 204-213.
    13. Parker, Rachel & Cox, Stephen, 2018. "How the globalisation and financialisation of mining Majors affects linkage development with local engineering and technology suppliers in the Queensland resources industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 125-130.
    14. Boeva, Bistra, 2015. "Corporate Governance and Global Supply Chains: How Self -regulation Replaces the Lack of Regulatory Initiatives or Do Regulatory Initiatives Add Value to Corporate Governance," MPRA Paper 70680, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jannesar Niri, Anahita & Poelzer, Gregory A. & Zhang, Steven E. & Rosenkranz, Jan & Pettersson, Maria & Ghorbani, Yousef, 2024. "Sustainability challenges throughout the electric vehicle battery value chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Dong, Weiwei & Niu, XiaoQin & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Naseem, Imran & Zaman, Khalid, 2024. "E-commerce mineral resource footprints: Investigating drivers for sustainable mining development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Cesar Saenz, 2024. "Stakeholders, social and environmental impact management as key factors of the corporate social management in the mining industry: A Peruvian case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 697-708, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isacowitz, Jenna Jade & Schmeidl, Susanne & Tabelin, Carlito, 2022. "The operationalisation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in a mining context," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. António Mateus & Luís Martins, 2021. "Building a mineral-based value chain in Europe: the balance between social acceptance and secure supply," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 239-261, July.
    3. Vicente Lima Crisóstomo & Priscila Azevedo Prudêncio & Isac Freitas Brandão, 2023. "Corporate Reputation in Brazil: The Effects of the Shareholding Control Configuration, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 243-263, November.
    4. Muhirwa, Fabien & Shen, Lei & Elshkaki, Ayman & Hirwa, Hubert & Umuziranenge, Gloriose & Velempini, Kgosietsile, 2023. "Linking large extractive industries to sustainable development of rural communities at mining sites in Africa: Challenges and pathways," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Manuela D’Eusanio & Monica Serreli & Luigia Petti, 2019. "Social Life-Cycle Assessment of a Piece of Jewellery. Emphasis on the Local Community," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Xuemei Xie & Yonghui Wu, 2022. "Doing Well and Doing Good: How Responsible Entrepreneurship Shapes Female Entrepreneurial Success," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 803-828, July.
    8. Małgorzata Dobrowolska & Bernadetta Izydorczyk, 2017. "Classifications of People Addicted to Work, Treatment and Measurement of Workaholism - A Case Study," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, ejes_v3_i.
    9. Famiyeh, Samuel & Opoku, Robert.A. & Kwarteng, Amoako & Asante-Darko, Disraeli, 2021. "Driving forces of sustainability in the mining industry: Evidence from a developing country," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Clara Pérez-Cornejo & Esther de Quevedo-Puente, 2023. "How corporate social responsibility mediates the relationship between corporate reputation and enterprise risk management: evidence from Spain," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 363-383, June.
    11. Roth, Victoria, 2021. "Talking is Silver, Doing is Gold? – The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 637-672.
    12. Gudrun Franken & Philip Schütte, 2022. "Current trends in addressing environmental and social risks in mining and mineral supply chains by regulatory and voluntary approaches," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(3), pages 653-671, December.
    13. Maarten Koese & Carlos F. Blanco & Vicente B. Vert & Martina G. Vijver, 2023. "A social life cycle assessment of vanadium redox flow and lithium‐ion batteries for energy storage," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 223-237, February.
    14. Deveci, Muhammet & Brito-Parada, Pablo R. & Pamucar, Dragan & Varouchakis, Emmanouil A., 2022. "Rough sets based Ordinal Priority Approach to evaluate sustainable development goals (SDGs) for sustainable mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Pavel Lebedev, 2019. "Management Accounting Maturity Levels Continuum Model: a Conceptual Framework," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejes_v5_i.
    16. Abdul-Wadood Moomen & Pierre Lacroix & Michela Bertolotto & David Jensen, 2020. "The Drive towards Consensual Perspectives for Enhancing Sustainable Mining," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Sidorenko, Olga & Sairinen, Rauno & Moore, Kathryn, 2020. "Rethinking the concept of small-scale mining for technologically advanced raw materials production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Grygorak Mariya, 2018. "Formation of management mechanisms of balanced development of logistics services market," Technology audit and production reserves, 2(40) 2018, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(40)), pages 29-37.
    19. Sreevas Sahasranamam & Bindu Arya & Mukesh Sud, 2020. "Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1165-1192, December.
    20. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s0301420722007231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.