IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v55y2018icp184-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cutoff grade optimization in open pit mines using genetic algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmadi, Mohammad Reza
  • Shahabi, Reza Shakoor

Abstract

The fundamental objective of production planning is to create a mechanism for the implementation of the mining cutoff grades and short-term production planning. One of the most important parameters in open pit design is a determination of the optimal cutoff grade. Optimum cutoff grade results in maximizing profits or maximizing the net present value. Given that in determining the cutoff grade with the goal of maximizing profits, a constant value is obtained for the entire life of the mine. The annual income of the mine will be the same throughout its lifetime, and the time value of the money has not been neglected; which is the main disadvantage of this optimization process. While in optimization with the goal of maximizing net present value, the optimal value will be a function of the time and will be greater in the early years of the mine and will gradually decrease. Optimization of cutoff grades with the aim of maximizing the net present value over the life of the mine is important due to its dependence on the economic parameters, the design of the open pit mining and fundamental issues. Maximizing the net present value is a nonlinear programming problem. To determine the optimal cutoff grade Lane method is commonly used. Lane provided his method to determine the optimal cutoff grade by considering factors such as the capacity of the mine, concentrator and load capacity of the treatment plant, the time value of money and distributing grade. The procedure of the Lane method for cutoff grade calculation is complicated and time-consuming. Considering the widespread use of heuristic methods in optimizing parameters, In the present study genetic algorithm, which is a smart algorithm, is used to determine the optimal cutoff grade. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of the genetic algorithm and Lane's theory in optimizing the degree of limit based on maximizing the net present value. Using separate programming based on the genetic algorithm and considering the capacity limitations and the proportion between the parameters of mining to smelter and refining in the mine is done. For this purpose, consider precision of 0.001%, optimum cutoff grades, the amount of output per unit and the net present value are calculated. The optimum cutoff grade at the beginning of the life of the mine is equal to 0.506% and at the end of the life of the mine to 0.222% using the genetic algorithm. Using the Lane model at the beginning of the life of the mine the optimum cut-off grade from 0/503% to 0/220% reaches at the end of the mine's life. The net present value of earnings over a lifespan of 7 years mine in the genetic algorithm and Lane model is $ 93,467,914 and $ 94,408,000 respectively. Also, the amount of mining, the amount of processing and the amount of refinery obtained by the genetic algorithm method are compared to the Lane model. The results of the research indicate high speed and very low error of genetic algorithm and also a convergence of results with the Lane method.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmadi, Mohammad Reza & Shahabi, Reza Shakoor, 2018. "Cutoff grade optimization in open pit mines using genetic algorithm," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 184-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:184-191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.11.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142071730404X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.11.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Matt & Barr, Drew, 2014. "Cut-off grade: A real options analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 83-92.
    2. Azimi, Yousuf & Osanloo, Morteza & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2013. "An uncertainty based multi-criteria ranking system for open pit mining cut-off grade strategy selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 212-223.
    3. Rahimi, Esmaeil & Ghasemzadeh, Hasan, 2015. "A new algorithm to determine optimum cut-off grades considering technical, economical, environmental and social aspects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 51-63.
    4. Osanloo, M. & Rashidinejad, F. & Rezai, B., 2008. "Incorporating environmental issues into optimum cut-off grades modeling at porphyry copper deposits," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 222-229, December.
    5. Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2013. "A heuristic approach to stochastic cutoff grade optimization for open pit mining complexes with multiple processing streams," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 591-597.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biswas, Pritam & Sinha, Rabindra Kumar & Sen, Phalguni, 2023. "A review of state-of-the-art techniques for the determination of the optimum cut-off grade of a metalliferous deposit with a bibliometric mapping in a surface mine planning context," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Khan, Asif & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali, 2021. "A mixed integer programming based cut-off grade model for open-pit mining of complex poly-metallic resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Paithankar, Amol & Chatterjee, Snehamoy & Goodfellow, Ryan & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali, 2020. "Simultaneous stochastic optimization of production sequence and dynamic cut-off grades in an open pit mining operation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Guo, Hongquan & Nguyen, Hoang & Vu, Diep-Anh & Bui, Xuan-Nam, 2021. "Forecasting mining capital cost for open-pit mining projects based on artificial neural network approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Paithankar, Amol & Chatterjee, Snehamoy & Goodfellow, Ryan, 2021. "Open-pit mining complex optimization under uncertainty with integrated cut-off grade based destination policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Ahmadi, Mohammad Reza & Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani, 2019. "Cutoff grades optimization in open pit mines using meta-heuristic algorithms," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 72-82.
    7. Yingyu Gu & Guoqing Li & Jie Hou & Chunchao Fan & Xingbang Qiang & Bin Bai & Yongfang Zhang, 2023. "Production Strategy Optimization of Integrated Exploitation for Multiple Deposits Considering Carbon Quota," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Noriega, Roberto & Pourrahimian, Yashar, 2022. "A systematic review of artificial intelligence and data-driven approaches in strategic open-pit mine planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Biswas, Pritam & Sinha, Rabindra Kumar & Sen, Phalguni & Rajpurohit, Sohan Singh, 2020. "Determination of optimum cut-off grade of an open-pit metalliferous deposit under various limiting conditions using a linearly advancing algorithm derived from dynamic programming," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biswas, Pritam & Sinha, Rabindra Kumar & Sen, Phalguni, 2023. "A review of state-of-the-art techniques for the determination of the optimum cut-off grade of a metalliferous deposit with a bibliometric mapping in a surface mine planning context," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Rahimi, Esmaeil & Akbari, Afshin, 2016. "Application of KKT in determining the final destination of mined material in multi-processing mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 10-18.
    3. Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali & Qureshi, Muhammad Asim & Jang, Hyongdoo, 2016. "A review of cut-off grade policy models for open pit mining operations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 142-152.
    4. Jyrki Savolainen & Ramin Rakhsha & Richard Durham, 2022. "Simulation-based decision-making system for optimal mine production plan selection," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(2), pages 267-281, June.
    5. Mohammadi, Sadjad & Kakaie, Reza & Ataei, Mohammad & Pourzamani, Eshagh, 2017. "Determination of the optimum cut-off grades and production scheduling in multi-product open pit mines using imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 39-48.
    6. Khan, Asif & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali, 2019. "A method for optimal cut-off grade policy in open pit mining operations under uncertain supply," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 178-184.
    7. Khan, Asif & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali, 2021. "A mixed integer programming based cut-off grade model for open-pit mining of complex poly-metallic resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Ahmadi, Mohammad Reza & Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani, 2019. "Cutoff grades optimization in open pit mines using meta-heuristic algorithms," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 72-82.
    9. Del Castillo, Maria Fernanda & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2016. "A multivariate destination policy for geometallurgical variables in mineral value chains using coalition-formation clustering," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 322-332.
    10. Rahimi, Esmaeil & Ghasemzadeh, Hasan, 2015. "A new algorithm to determine optimum cut-off grades considering technical, economical, environmental and social aspects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 51-63.
    11. Mai, Ngoc Luan & Topal, Erkan & Erten, Oktay & Sommerville, Bruce, 2019. "A new risk-based optimisation method for the iron ore production scheduling using stochastic integer programming," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 571-579.
    12. Inthavongsa, Inthanongsone & Drebenstedt, Carsten & Bongaerts, Jan & Sontamino, Phongpat, 2016. "Real options decision framework: Strategic operating policies for open pit mine planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 142-153.
    13. Kuangyuan Zhang & Richard Olawoyin & Antonio Nieto & Andrew N. Kleit, 2018. "Risk of commodity price, production cost and time to build in resource economics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 2521-2544, December.
    14. Savolainen, Jyrki, 2016. "Real options in metal mining project valuation: Review of literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 49-65.
    15. Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2013. "A heuristic approach to stochastic cutoff grade optimization for open pit mining complexes with multiple processing streams," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 591-597.
    16. Mahmoud A. Eissa & Boping Tian, 2017. "Lobatto-Milstein Numerical Method in Application of Uncertainty Investment of Solar Power Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Biswas, Pritam & Sinha, Rabindra Kumar & Sen, Phalguni & Rajpurohit, Sohan Singh, 2020. "Determination of optimum cut-off grade of an open-pit metalliferous deposit under various limiting conditions using a linearly advancing algorithm derived from dynamic programming," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Waqar Ali Asad, Mohammad & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2012. "Optimal production scale of open pit mining operations with uncertain metal supply and long-term stockpiles," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 81-89.
    19. Kamel, Ahmed & Elwageeh, Mohamed & Bonduà, Stefano & Elkarmoty, Mohamed, 2023. "Evaluation of mining projects subjected to economic uncertainties using the Monte Carlo simulation and the binomial tree method: Case study in a phosphate mine in Egypt," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Guo, Jianxin & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei & Cheng, Yonglong, 2024. "Integrated management of abatement technology investment and resource extraction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:184-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.