IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v29y2013icp63-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Major considerations in developing a hub-and-spoke network to improve the cost performance of container barge transport in the hinterland: the case of the port of Rotterdam

Author

Listed:
  • Konings, Rob
  • Kreutzberger, Ekki
  • Maraš, Vladislav

Abstract

This paper examines ways in which the handling of container barges in the seaport of Rotterdam could be improved with the ultimate aim of expanding the role of barges in the transportation of containers to the hinterland. It argues that the replacement of the present barge services with hub-and-spoke networks would be a promising strategy. The main purpose of the paper is to point out that hub-and-spoke networks can be set up in different ways and to explore the different impacts that these can have on their economic feasibility. A cost model is presented which compares the cost performance of present services to the hinterland with that of the different settings in the hub-and-spoke network, i.e. type and size of vessel, the barge-handling process in the hub, the location of the hub and the handling process at the seaport terminal. The results show that hub-and-spoke has the potential to deliver a better cost performance provided the handling costs in the hub can be kept within limits.

Suggested Citation

  • Konings, Rob & Kreutzberger, Ekki & Maraš, Vladislav, 2013. "Major considerations in developing a hub-and-spoke network to improve the cost performance of container barge transport in the hinterland: the case of the port of Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 63-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:29:y:2013:i:c:p:63-73
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692313000033
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pielage, Ben-Japp & Konings, Rob & Schuylenburg, Maurits van, 2007. "Barge Hub Terminals: A Perspective For More Efficient Hinterland Container Transport For The Port Rotterdam," 48th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, March 15-17, 2007 207922, Transportation Research Forum.
    2. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    3. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Debrie, Jean & Fremont, Antoine & Gouvernal, Elisabeth, 2010. "Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 519-529.
    4. Caris, A. & Macharis, C. & Janssens, G.K., 2011. "Network analysis of container barge transport in the port of Antwerp by means of simulation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 125-133.
    5. Albert Veenstra & Rob Zuidwijk & Eelco van Asperen, 2012. "The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(1), pages 14-32, March.
    6. Visser, Johan & Konings, Rob & Wiegmans, Bart & Pielage, Ben-Jaap, 2007. "A new hinterland transport concept for the port of Rotterdam: organisational and/or technological challenges?," 48th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, March 15-17, 2007 207936, Transportation Research Forum.
    7. Jean-Paul Rodrigue & Theo Notteboom, 2009. "The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 165-183, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veterina Nosadila Riaventin & Sofyan Dwi Cahyo & Ivan Kristianto Singgih, 2021. "A Model for Developing Existing Ports Considering Economic Impact and Network Connectivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Bilegan, Ioana C. & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Wang, Yunfei, 2022. "Scheduled service network design with revenue management considerations and an intermodal barge transportation illustration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 164-177.
    3. Wiercx, Max & van Kalmthout, Martijn & Wiegmans, Bart, 2019. "Inland waterway terminal yard configuration contributing to sustainability: Modeling yard operations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 4-16.
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    5. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Kai & Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Tug scheduling for hinterland barge transport: A branch-and-price approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 119-132.
    6. Li, Shijie & Negenborn, Rudy R. & Lodewijks, Gabriel, 2017. "Closed-loop coordination of inland vessels operations in large seaports using hybrid logic-based benders decomposition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-21.
    7. Jacobsson, Stefan & Arnäs, Per Olof & Stefansson, Gunnar, 2018. "Differentiation of access management services at seaport terminals: Facilitating potential improvements for road hauliers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 256-264.
    8. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Qiu, Xuan & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan, 2021. "Pricing and scheduling of barge hinterland transportation service for inbound containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Škurić, Maja & Maraš, Vladislav & Davidović, Tatjana & Radonjić, Aleksandar, 2021. "Optimal allocating and sizing of passenger ferry fleet in maritime transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Peter Shobayo & Edwin van Hassel, 2019. "Container barge congestion and handling in large seaports: a theoretical agent-based modeling approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Chen, Hong & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Liu, Nan, 2018. "Strategic investment in enhancing port–hinterland container transportation network resilience: A network game theory approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 83-112.
    13. Fazi, Stefano, 2019. "A decision-support framework for the stowage of maritime containers in inland shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-23.
    14. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    15. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    16. Yu, Mingzhu & Fransoo, Jan C. & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2018. "Detention decisions for empty containers in the hinterland transportation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-208.
    17. Bedoya-Maya, Felipe & Beckers, Joris & van Hassel, Edwin, 2023. "Spillover effects from inland waterway transport development: Spatial assessment of the Rhine-Alpine Corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Piotr Durajczyk & Natalia Drop, 2021. "Possibilities of Using Inland Navigation to Improve Efficiency of Urban and Interurban Freight Transport with the Use of the River Information Services (RIS) System—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Yan Sun & Xinya Li, 2019. "Fuzzy Programming Approaches for Modeling a Customer-Centred Freight Routing Problem in the Road-Rail Intermodal Hub-and-Spoke Network with Fuzzy Soft Time Windows and Multiple Sources of Time Uncerta," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-40, August.
    20. Caris, An & Limbourg, Sabine & Macharis, Cathy & van Lier, Tom & Cools, Mario, 2014. "Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 126-136.
    21. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Dong & Notteboom, Theo & Zhou, Xin, 2021. "Spatial, temporal and institutional characteristics of entry strategies in inland container terminals: A comparison between Yangtze River and Rhine River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Roy Van den Berg & Peter W. De Langen, 2015. "Towards an 'inland terminal centred' value proposition," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 499-515, July.
    3. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    5. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    6. Iannone, Fedele, 2012. "The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1424-1448.
    7. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    8. Liu, Weichen & Cao, Youhui & Chen, Jianglong & Guo, Jiaying & Liang, Shuangbo, 2023. "Organization of river-sea container transportation in the Yangtze River: Processes and mechanisms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Wan, Shulin & Luan, Weixin & Chen, Yuying & Lin, Qiaoqiao, 2022. "Influence of dry ports construction on seaport growth: Case of Ningbo Zhoushan Port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-47.
    10. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    11. de Almeida Rodrigues, Thiago & Maria de Miranda Mota, Caroline & Manuele dos Santos, Inez, 2021. "Determining dry port criteria that support decision making," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    13. Bergqvist, Rickard & Monios, Jason, 2021. "Drivers for migration of an intermodal network hub from a port to an inland terminal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    15. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    16. Caris, An & Limbourg, Sabine & Macharis, Cathy & van Lier, Tom & Cools, Mario, 2014. "Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 126-136.
    17. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    18. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    19. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    20. Jagan Jeevan & Shu-Ling Chen & Stephen Cahoon, 2018. "Determining the influential factors of dry port operations: worldwide experiences and empirical evidence from Malaysia," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 476-494, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:29:y:2013:i:c:p:63-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.