IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v17y2009i5p338-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland

Author

Listed:
  • Roso, Violeta
  • Woxenius, Johan
  • Lumsden, Kenth

Abstract

The dry port concept is based on a seaport directly connected by rail with inland intermodal terminals where containers can be dealt with in the same way as if they were in a seaport. The main purpose of the article is to extend the theory behind the dry port concept and to define three dry port categories; distant, midrange and close. The findings show that the dry port concept can help identify ways of shifting freight volumes from road to more energy efficient traffic modes that are less harmful to the environment, relieve seaport cities from some congestion and facilitate improved logistics solutions for shippers in the port’s hinterland.

Suggested Citation

  • Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:17:y:2009:i:5:p:338-345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692308001245
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 55-77, March.
    2. Cullinane, Kevin & Song, Dong-Wook & Gray, Richard, 2002. "A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 743-762, October.
    3. C J L Yewlett, 2001. "OR in strategic land-use planning," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(1), pages 4-13, January.
    4. T. Heaver & H. Meersman & E. Van De Voorde, 2001. "Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 293-305, July.
    5. A. Ballis & J. Golias & C. Abarkoumkin, 1997. "A comparison between conventional and advanced handling systems for low volume container maritime terminals," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 73-92, January.
    6. M. C. Moura O & M. V. Pato & A. C. Paixa O, 2002. "Ship assignment with hub and spoke constraints," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 135-150, April.
    7. Dimitrios Tsamboulas & Ioannis Dimitropoulos, 1999. "Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 381-398, November.
    8. Theo E. Notteboom, 2002. "Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 257-269.
    9. T. Heaver & H. Meersman & F. Moglia & E. Van De Voorde, 2000. "Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 363-373.
    10. Heaver, T. & Meersman, H. & Moglia, F. & van de Voorde, E., 2000. "Do Mergers and Alliances Influence European Shipping and Port Competition?," Research Papers 24175, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economic Sciences.
    11. Theo E. Notteboom & Willy Winkelmans, 2001. "Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 71-89, January.
    12. HEAVER, T. & MEERSMAN, Hilde & MOGLIA, F. & VAN DE VOORDE ,Eddy, "undated". "Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?," Working Papers 2000001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    13. Pellegram, A., 2001. "Strategic land use planning for freight: the experience of the Port of London Authority, 1994-1999," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 11-18, January.
    14. Alfred J Baird, 2002. "The Economics of Container Transhipment in Northern Europe," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 4(3), pages 249-280, September.
    15. Brian Slack & Claude Comtois & Robert McCalla, 2002. "Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 65-76, January.
    16. Heaver, T. & Meersman, H. & van de Voorde, E., 2001. "Co-Operation and Competition in International Container Transport Strategies for Ports," Research Papers 24173, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economic Sciences.
    17. Ross Robinson, 2002. "Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 241-255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heaver, Trevor, 2006. "The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-41, January.
    2. Cullinane, Kevin & Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Introduction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Panayides, Photis M. & Wiedmer, Robert, 2011. "Strategic alliances in container liner shipping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-38.
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    5. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    6. Van de Voorde, Eddy E.M., 2005. "What Future the Maritime Sector: Some Considerations on Globalisation, Co-Operation and Market Power," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 253-277, January.
    7. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2011. "The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1379-1386.
    8. Francesco Parola & Giovanni Satta & Simone Caschili, 2014. "Unveiling co-operative networks and 'hidden families' in the container port industry," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 384-404, July.
    9. Monios, Jason, 2011. "The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-66.
    10. Cullinane, Kevin, 2004. "7. The Container Shipping Industry And The Impact Of China'S Accession To The Wto," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 221-245, January.
    11. Notteboom, Theo, 2006. "Chapter 19 Concession Agreements as Port Governance Tools," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 437-455, January.
    12. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    14. Bichou, K. & Gray, R., 2005. "A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 75-92, January.
    15. Y. H. Venus Lun & Kee‐Hung Lai & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2008. "A Descriptive Framework for the Development and Operation of Liner Shipping Networks," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 439-457, August.
    16. Daniele Crotti & Claudio Ferrari & Alessio Tei, 2020. "Merger waves and alliance stability in container shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 446-472, September.
    17. Cheng-Hsien Hsieh & Hui-Huang Tai & Yang-Ning Lee, 2014. "Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 589-606, November.
    18. González Laxe, Fernando, 2018. "El transporte marítimo y los desarrollos portuarios. El nuevo rol de las alianzas marítimas en el tablero internacional/The Maritime Transport and the Port Development. The New Role of the Maritime Al," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 647-668, Septiembr.
    19. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    20. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:17:y:2009:i:5:p:338-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.