IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v26y1999i4p381-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Tsamboulas
  • Ioannis Dimitropoulos

Abstract

The paper presents and analyses appraisal methods used for the assessment of potential investments in Nodal Centers for Goods (also called Freight Villages), which constitute an essential element of the Trans-European Network for Intermodal Transport. A methodological procedure is applied to identify the underlying factors that influence the choice of an appraisal method, without assessing or comparing the appraisal methods themselves. Following this procedure, issues addressed by the methods are grouped into three broad dimensions and with the use of non-parametric statistical tests, existing relationships are identified between nodal centres' characteristics, the appraisal methods, as well as the actors involved in the decision process. On applying the above procedure to European Nodal Centres for goods, it is found that the choice of appraisal method and the decision criteria for the investment are linked primarily to the nodal centre's size, catchment area, and the support or absence of political approval for the investment. The results of the analysis can be particularly useful at the policy making level, serving as non-formal "qualitative guidelines" to identify the appraisal method to be applied, as well as the options and impacts to be considered. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Tsamboulas & Ioannis Dimitropoulos, 1999. "Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 381-398, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:26:y:1999:i:4:p:381-398
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1005134525773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1005134525773
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1005134525773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    2. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Trucking Industry Demand for Urban Shared Use Freight Terminals," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0v33g422, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    4. van den Heuvel, Frank P. & de Langen, Peter W. & van Donselaar, Karel H. & Fransoo, Jan C., 2013. "Spatial concentration and location dynamics in logistics: the case of a Dutch province," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 39-48.
    5. José Manuel Naranjo Gómez, 2016. "Impacts on the Social Cohesion of Mainland Spain’s Future Motorway and High-Speed Rail Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Maria Berrittella, 2010. "A macroeconomic analysis of the public investments in European combined transport," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 167-181, August.
    7. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios A. & Kapros, Seraphim, 2003. "Freight village evaluation under uncertainty with public and private financing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 141-156, April.
    8. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    9. Smid, Martijn & Dekker, Sander & Wiegmans, Bart, 2016. "Modeling the cost sensitivity of intermodal inland waterway terminals: A scenario based approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 112-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:26:y:1999:i:4:p:381-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.