IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v100y2022ics0966692322000503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does China-Pakistan Economic Corridor improve connectivity in Pakistan? A protocol assessing the planned transport network infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jianting
  • Sun, Guibo
  • Webster, Chris

Abstract

China invested vastly in overseas infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which aims at improving international connectivity through collaboration with partner countries. For these countries, capturing the developments from BRI's massive transport infrastructure investments becomes a crucial economic multiplier. But there are few methods available in the existing literature. In this paper, we developed an analytical protocol that evaluates the changes in transport network connectivity before and after the BRI transport infrastructure construction, using open-source data and tools, and tested it on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the flagship project of BRI. Results show that China's transport infrastructure investment may improve connectivity and the potential for economic agglomeration in certain key cities and some regions in Pakistan but would widen the development inequality in the country. Our protocol benefits are threefold. First, it provides a quantitative estimation of the change in economic geography, accessibility and agglomeration-forming potentials, resulting from China's transport infrastructure investment. Second, it can be replicated to different scales and locations with easy-access open data. Last, its usage of open-source platforms and open data enables wide adoption by the public, especially agents with limited resources. Potential beneficiaries such as the governments of recipient countries, academics, funding providers, and private sectors can follow our protocol to assess the likely regional accessibility patterns and potential spatial economy from BRI-related transport infrastructure developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jianting & Sun, Guibo & Webster, Chris, 2022. "Does China-Pakistan Economic Corridor improve connectivity in Pakistan? A protocol assessing the planned transport network infrastructure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:100:y:2022:i:c:s0966692322000503
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692322000503
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shamsa Kanwal & Abdul Hameed Pitafi & Muhammad Yousaf Malik & Naseer Abbas Khan & Rao Muhammad Rashid, 2020. "Local Pakistani Citizens’ Benefits and Attitudes Toward China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Projects," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    2. Sun, Guibo & Wallace, Dugald & Webster, Chris, 2020. "Unravelling the impact of street network structure and gated community layout in development-oriented transit design," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Sarlas, Georgios & Páez, Antonio & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Hairui Wei & Zhaohan Sheng, 2018. "Logistics connectivity considering import and export for Chinese inland regions in the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road by dry ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 53-70, January.
    5. Zhai, Fan, 2018. "China’s belt and road initiative: A preliminary quantitative assessment," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 84-92.
    6. Varun Raturi & Ashish Verma, 2019. "Competition between High Speed Rail and Conventional Transport Modes: Market Entry Game Analysis on Indian Corridors," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 763-790, September.
    7. Yanyan Gao & Shunfeng Song & Jun Sun & Leizhen Zang, 2020. "Does high‐speed rail connection really promote local economy? Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 316-338, February.
    8. Ryuichi Shibasaki & Satoshi Tanabe & Hironori Kato & Paul Tae-Woo Lee, 2019. "Could Gwadar Port in Pakistan Be a New Gateway? A Network Simulation Approach in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    9. Roberts,Mark & Melecky,Martin & Bougna,Theophile & Xu,Yan-000462055, 2018. "Transport corridors and their wider economic benefits : a critical review of the literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8302, The World Bank.
    10. WANG, James Jixian & YAU, Selina, 2018. "Case studies on transport infrastructure projects in belt and road initiative: An actor network theory perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 213-223.
    11. Kevin X. Li & Mengjie Jin & Guanqiu Qi & Wenming Shi & Adolf K. Y. Ng, 2018. "Logistics as a driving force for development under the Belt and Road Initiative – the Chinese model for developing countries," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 457-478, July.
    12. Chacon-Hurtado, Davis & Kumar, Indraneel & Gkritza, Konstantina & Fricker, Jon D. & Beaulieu, Lionel J., 2020. "The role of transportation accessibility in regional economic resilience," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Yanchao & Hu, Jin & Afshan, Sahar & Irfan, Muhammad & Hu, Mingjun & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Bridging resource disparities for sustainable development: A comparative analysis of resource-rich and resource-scarce countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Tomasz Komornicki & Sławomir Goliszek, 2023. "New Transport Infrastructure and Regional Development of Central and Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Ullah, Irfan & Zhang, Jiawei & Rehman, Alam & Zeeshan, Muhammad, 2022. "Linkages between trade openness, natural gas production and poverty in Pakistan: A simultaneous equation approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Mehtab Begum Siddiqui & Maryam Khokhar & Tayyaba Rafique Makhdoom & Md Billal Hossain & Sarmad Ejaz & Faisal Ejaz & Anna Dunay, 2023. "The Impact of Pak and China Cultural influences on CPEC Energy Project Moderating effect in South Asia: A Case Study from Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 211-219, November.
    5. Wenshuang Zhao & Nan Jiang & Yuanyuan Wei & Xinke Zhao, 2023. "Geo-Economic Analysis Based on an Improved Ant Colony Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Noorali, Hassan & Flint, Colin & Ahmadi, Seyyed Abbas, 2022. "Port power: Towards a new geopolitical world order," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli & Shumin Wang & Xiaoshan Yan & Yuehan He, 2023. "Innovation of the Social Security, Legal Risks, Sustainable Management Practices and Employee Environmental Awareness in The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mukunda Adhikari & Zhiguo Ma, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative as a Gateway to the Sea for Land-Locked Countries: With Reference to Nepal," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    2. Wei Yang & Feihuang Xue & Jinfeng Shi & Yanmin Shao & Di Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Trade Dependence Relationship of Asian Countries with China: Implications for China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Liu, Zhigao & Schindler, Seth & Liu, Weidong, 2020. "Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Wang, Hao & Han, Yonghui & Fidrmuc, Jan & Wei, Dongming, 2021. "Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 237-256.
    5. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Ruta, Michele, 2020. "Common transport infrastructure: A quantitative model and estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Li, Shengchao & Cao, Xiaoshu & Liao, Wang & He, Yongquan, 2020. "Factors in the sea ports-of-entry and road ports-of-entry cross-border logistics route choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Jiangjun Wan & Chunchi Ma & Tian Jiang & Andrew Phillips & Xiong Wu & Yanlan Wang & Ziming Wang & Ying Cao, 2024. "A spatial econometric investigation into road traffic accessibility and economic growth: insights from the Chengdu-Chongqing twin-city economic circle," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Changping Zhao & Yecheng Wang & Tianxiang Zhang & Qingbo Huang & Yu Gong, 2019. "The Game Simulation of “The Belt and Road” Economic and Trade Network Based on the Asymmetric QRE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Yanfeng Liu & Miao Su & Jinjing Zhao & Sally Martin & Kum Fai Yuen & Choong-Bae Lee, 2023. "The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment: a vector error correction model analysis of coastal and landlocked countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 29-56, February.
    10. Koffi Dumor & Yao Li & Ma Yongkai & Enock Mintah Ampaw & Hafez Komla Dumor, 2022. "Evaluating the belt and road initiative effects on trade and migration: Evidence from the East African community," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(1), pages 16-28, March.
    11. Dylan Sutherland & John Anderson & Nicholas Bailey & Ilan Alon, 0. "Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    12. Koffi Dumor & Li Yao, 2019. "Estimating China’s Trade with Its Partner Countries within the Belt and Road Initiative Using Neural Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Claudio Ferrari & Alessio Tei, 2020. "Effects of BRI strategy on Mediterranean shipping transport," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Visansack Khamphengvong & Hongou Zhang & Qitao Wu & Toulany Thavisay, 2022. "Examine the Economic and Social Effects on Lao People’s Perceived Benefit Attitudes towards BRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Yibang Zhang & Yukun Zou & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Xin Feng, 2022. "Evaluating Pedestrian Environment Using DeepLab Models Based on Street Walkability in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: Case Study in Gaoping, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Yanfeng Liu & Xue Li & Xiaonan Zhu & Min-Kyu Lee & Po-Lin Lai, 2023. "The theoretical systems of OFDI location determinants in global north and global south economies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Vanessa Brum-Bastos & Antonio Páez, 2023. "Hägerstrand meets big data: time-geography in the age of mobility analytics," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 327-336, July.
    18. Meixing Dai & Ke Dai & Gengxin Dai, 2018. "Initiative « une ceinture et une route » : implications économiques pour l’Union européenne," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 39(1), pages 25-38, December.
    19. Lei Zheng & Xuemeng Guo & Libin Zhao, 2021. "How Does Transportation Infrastructure Improve Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from High-Speed Railway Openings in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    20. Yanyan Gao & Yongqing Nan & Shunfeng Song, 2022. "High‐speed rail and city tourism: Evidence from Tencent migration big data on two Chinese golden weeks," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1012-1036, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:100:y:2022:i:c:s0966692322000503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.