IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v78y2024ics0969698924000651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring home delivery service attributes: Sustainability versus delivery expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Kotzab, Herbert
  • Yumurtacı HüseyinoÄŸlu, Işık Özge
  • Åžen, Irmak
  • Mena, Carlos

Abstract

Many consumers expect e-commerce home delivery to be sustainable and fast. To better understand the dilemma behind these requirements, we analyzed e-commerce players' practices and assessed consumers' preferences for home delivery using a mixed-methods approach. We used exploratory structured interviews with logistics and e-commerce companies to reveal their home delivery options, and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 400 consumers to identify their home delivery preferences. Our study provides new insights into consumer expectations and preferences regarding home delivery solutions offered by e-commerce companies. Our findings provide empirical evidence of consumer expectations regarding individualization, innovation, and sustainable service alternatives for home delivery. Our results indicate that delivery speed is the most desired home delivery attribute, followed by delivery options, reusable packaging, and delivery by electric delivery vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotzab, Herbert & Yumurtacı HüseyinoÄŸlu, Işık Özge & Åžen, Irmak & Mena, Carlos, 2024. "Exploring home delivery service attributes: Sustainability versus delivery expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924000651
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan & Qiu, Rongzu, 2021. "The adoption of self-driving delivery robots in last mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Vakulenko, Yulia & Arsenovic, Jasenko & Hellström, Daniel & Shams, Poja, 2022. "Does delivery service differentiation matter? Comparing rural to urban e-consumer satisfaction and retention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 476-484.
    3. Markus Trapp & Sandra Luttermann & Daniel Rippel & Herbert Kotzab & Michael Freitag, 2021. "Modeling Individualized Sustainable Last Mile Logistics," Springer Books, in: Michael Freitag & Herbert Kotzab & Nicole Megow (ed.), Dynamics in Logistics, pages 277-293, Springer.
    4. Heleen Buldeo Rai & Laetitia Dablanc, 2023. "Hunting for treasure: a systematic literature review on urban logistics and e-commerce data," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 204-233, March.
    5. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    6. Pahwa, Anmol & Jaller, Miguel, 2022. "A cost-based comparative analysis of different last-mile strategies for e-commerce delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Perboli, Guido & Brotcorne, Luce & Bruni, Maria Elena & Rosano, Mariangela, 2021. "A new model for Last-Mile Delivery and Satellite Depots management: The impact of the on-demand economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Tsai, Yao-Te & Tiwasing, Praewwanit, 2021. "Customers’ intention to adopt smart lockers in last-mile delivery service: A multi-theory perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Simoni, Michele D. & Kutanoglu, Erhan & Claudel, Christian G., 2020. "Optimization and analysis of a robot-assisted last mile delivery system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Pahwa, Anmol & Jaller, Miguel, 2023. "Assessing last-mile distribution resilience under demand disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Jasper Grashuis & Theodoros Skevas & Michelle S. Segovia, 2020. "Grocery Shopping Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-10, July.
    12. Janjevic, Milena & Winkenbach, Matthias & Merchán, Daniel, 2019. "Integrating collection-and-delivery points in the strategic design of urban last-mile e-commerce distribution networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 37-67.
    13. Vakulenko, Yulia & Shams, Poja & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2019. "Service innovation in e-commerce last mile delivery: Mapping the e-customer journey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 461-468.
    14. Rafael Villa & Andrés Monzón, 2021. "Mobility Restrictions and E-Commerce: Holistic Balance in Madrid Centre during COVID-19 Lockdown," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Yang, Hye-jeong & Fang, Mingjie & Yao, Jinge & Su, Miao, 2023. "Green cooperation in last-mile logistics and consumer loyalty: An empirical analysis of a theoretical framework," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Ehrler, Verena Ch & Schöder, Dustin & Seidel, Saskia, 2021. "Challenges and perspectives for the use of electric vehicles for last mile logistics of grocery e-commerce – Findings from case studies in Germany," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Kim, Dohee & Park, Byung-Jin (Robert), 2017. "The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 439-451.
    18. Cintia Machado de Oliveira & Renata Albergaria De Mello Bandeira & George Vasconcelos Goes & Daniel Neves Schmitz Gonçalves & Márcio De Almeida D’Agosto, 2017. "Sustainable Vehicles-Based Alternatives in Last Mile Distribution of Urban Freight Transport: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Sumedha Gupta & Laura Montenovo & Thuy Nguyen & Felipe Lozano‐Rojas & Ian Schmutte & Kosali Simon & Bruce A. Weinberg & Coady Wing, 2023. "Effects of social distancing policy on labor market outcomes," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(1), pages 166-193, January.
    20. Yael Deutsch & Boaz Golany, 2018. "A parcel locker network as a solution to the logistics last mile problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 251-261, January.
    21. Junjie Lv & Zichen Wang & Yuqing Huang & Tong Wang & Yuanzhuo Wang, 2020. "How Can E-Commerce Businesses Implement Discount Strategies through Social Media?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    22. Chen, Liuyan & Wu, Pengkun & Dou, Yudan & Wu, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Investigating senders’ switching intention to smart lockers: An extension of push-pull-mooring model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    23. Xiang, Diandian & Jiao, Guanzhe & Sun, Bin & Peng, Chenming & Ran, Yaxuan, 2022. "Prosumer-to-customer exchange in the sharing economy: Evidence from the P2P accommodation context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 426-441.
    24. Goeke, D. & Schneider, M., 2015. "Routing a Mixed Fleet of Electric and Conventional Vehicles," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 65939, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    25. Roselinde Kessels & Peter Goos & Bradley Jones & Martina Vandebroek, 2011. "Rejoinder: the usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 197-203, May.
    26. John Rose & Michiel Bliemer, 2013. "Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 1021-1041, September.
    27. Lemardelé, Clément & Estrada, Miquel & Pagès, Laia & Bachofner, Mónika, 2021. "Potentialities of drones and ground autonomous delivery devices for last-mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    28. Martin Savelsbergh & Tom Van Woensel, 2016. "50th Anniversary Invited Article—City Logistics: Challenges and Opportunities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 579-590, May.
    29. Peer Witten & Carmen Schmidt, 2019. "Globale Trends und die Konsequenzen für die Logistik der letzten Meile," Springer Books, in: Meike Schröder & Kirsten Wegner (ed.), Logistik im Wandel der Zeit – Von der Produktionssteuerung zu vernetzten Supply Chains, pages 303-319, Springer.
    30. Beckers, Joris & Cardenas, Ivan & Sanchez-Diaz, Ivan, 2022. "Managing household freight: The impact of online shopping on residential freight trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 299-311.
    31. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Li, Yuyu & Shang, Jennifer & Urban, Timothy L., 2019. "Impact of drone delivery on sustainability and cost: Realizing the UAV potential through vehicle routing optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1164-1175.
    32. Roselinde Kessels & Bradley Jones & Peter Goos, 2015. "An improved two‐stage variance balance approach for constructing partial profile designs for discrete choice experiments," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 626-648, September.
    33. Emília Guerra Dias & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Cassiano Augusto Isler, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Delivery Attributes on E-Shopping Consumer Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    34. Roselinde Kessels & Bradley Jones & Peter Goos & Martina Vandebroek, 2011. "The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 173-188, May.
    35. Teller, Christoph & Kotzab, Herbert & Grant, David B., 2012. "The relevance of shopper logistics for consumers of store-based retail formats," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 59-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heimfarth, Andreas & Ostermeier, Manuel & Hübner, Alexander, 2022. "A mixed truck and robot delivery approach for the daily supply of customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 401-421.
    2. Großmann, Heiko, 2019. "A practical approach to designing partial-profile choice experiments with two alternatives for estimating main effects and interactions of many two-level attributes," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Li, Zhaotong & Wu, Min & Teo, Chee-Chong & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "An investigation of consumer switching intention on the use of automated courier station from a signaling perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Kokkinou, Alinda & Quak, Hans & Mitas, Ondrej & Mandemakers, Albert, 2024. "Should I wait or should I go? Encouraging customers to make the more sustainable delivery choice," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Richard Yao & Riccardo Scarpa & John Rose & James Turner, 2015. "Experimental Design Criteria and Their Behavioural Efficiency: An Evaluation in the Field," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(3), pages 433-455, November.
    10. Cui, Shaohua & Yang, Ying & Gao, Kun & Cui, Heqi & Najafi, Arsalan, 2024. "Integration of UAVs with public transit for delivery: Quantifying system benefits and policy implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Bansal, Prateek & Kessels, Roselinde & Krueger, Rico & Graham, Daniel J., 2022. "Preferences for using the London Underground during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 45-60.
    12. Van Acker, Veronique & Kessels, Roselinde & Palhazi Cuervo, Daniel & Lannoo, Steven & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Preferences for long-distance coach transport: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 759-779.
    13. Verelst, Frederik & Willem, Lander & Kessels, Roselinde & Beutels, Philippe, 2018. "Individual decisions to vaccinate one's child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 106-116.
    14. Yu, Vincent F. & Jodiawan, Panca & Hou, Ming-Lu & Gunawan, Aldy, 2021. "Design of a two-echelon freight distribution system in last-mile logistics considering covering locations and occasional drivers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Ostermeier, Manuel & Heimfarth, Andreas & Hübner, Alexander, 2023. "The multi-vehicle truck-and-robot routing problem for last-mile delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 680-697.
    16. Vasco Silva & António Amaral & Tânia Fontes, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Last-Mile Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Zhang, Wenwei & Xu, Min & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Joint location and pricing optimization of self-service in urban logistics considering customers’ choice behavior," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2024. "Last-Mile logistics with on-premises parcel Lockers: Who are the real Beneficiaries?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. van Cranenburgh, Sander & Collins, Andrew T., 2019. "New software tools for creating stated choice experimental designs efficient for regret minimisation and utility maximisation decision rules," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 104-123.
    20. Louis Faugère & Chelsea White & Benoit Montreuil, 2020. "Mobile Access Hub Deployment for Urban Parcel Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.