IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v39y2017icp1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer response to price changes in higher-priced brands

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Ava
  • Dawes, John
  • Lockshin, Larry
  • Greenacre, Luke

Abstract

Price elasticity is a widely used measure of consumers’ willingness or ability to pay for goods and services. This research examines the price elasticity of high-priced brands. We define high-priced brands as those that sell at or above the price point at which consumers begin to consider that product to be luxurious or premium in the category (Kapferer et al., 2014; Sjostrom et al., 2016). More specifically, we use high-priced wine brands as the context for this research. Wine is an ideal product to use because it has a wide price range, and can be purchased for various consumption situations. When prices are high we anticipate that elasticities may no longer function as they do in everyday consumer packaged goods markets. Instead, they might become smaller or possibly even positive if consumers are prepared to pay for the quality they desire. We employ stated choice experiments to investigate how Situational Factors, Consumer Factors and Contextual Factors influence price elasticities for high-priced wine brands in Australia. Results are that price elasticity estimates for the high-priced brands in this study are −1.8 on average. This is lower than the commonly reported figure of −2.6 for brands in general; however, in one part of the experiment respondents chose for a ‘high-importance’ occasion. Smaller price elasticities were found when (1) the perceived importance of the consumption situation was high, (2) among regular high-priced wine buyers, and (3) among brands with a higher initial price position. These results demonstrate that the patterns of price elasticity for high-priced products are mainly similar to that for other FMCG products, but consumers are slightly less responsive.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Ava & Dawes, John & Lockshin, Larry & Greenacre, Luke, 2017. "Consumer response to price changes in higher-priced brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:39:y:2017:i:c:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698917300309
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helsen, Kristiaan & Schmittlein, David, 1994. "Understanding price effects for new nondurables: How price responsiveness varies across depth-of-repeat classes and types of consumers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 359-374, July.
    2. Thorstein Veblen, 1899. "Mr. Cummings's Strictures on "The Theory of the Leisure Class"," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(1), pages 106-106.
    3. Kapferer, Jean-Noël, 2012. "Abundant rarity: The key to luxury growth," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 453-462.
    4. Wang, Bing-Shun & Wang, Xiao-Jin & Gong, Li-Kun, 2009. "The Construction of a Williams Design and Randomization in Cross-Over Clinical Trials Using SAS," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 29(c01).
    5. Ruth N. Bolton, 1989. "The Relationship Between Market Characteristics and Promotional Price Elasticities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 153-169.
    6. Dickson, Peter R, 1982. "The Impact of Enriching Case and Statistical Information on Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(4), pages 398-406, March.
    7. David R. Bell & Jeongwen Chiang & V. Padmanabhan, 1999. "The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 504-526.
    8. Mundel, Juan & Huddleston, Patricia & Vodermeier, Michael, 2017. "An exploratory study of consumers’ perceptions: What are affordable luxuries?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 68-75.
    9. Veblen, Thorstein, 1899. "The Theory of the Leisure Class," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1899.
    10. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy & Little, John D C, 1994. "An Empirical Analysis of Latitude of Price Acceptance in Consumer Package Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 408-418, December.
    12. Peter M. Guadagni & John D. C. Little, 1983. "A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 203-238.
    13. Jean-Noël Kapferer, 2012. "Abundant rarity: The key to luxury growth," Post-Print hal-00731044, HAL.
    14. Woodside, Arch G. & Ozcan, Timucin, 2009. "Customer choices of manufacturer versus retailer brands in alternative price and usage contexts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 100-108.
    15. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Cindy Klippert & Lara Leproux, 2014. "Does luxury have a minimum price? An exploratory study into consumers' psychology of luxury prices," Post-Print hal-00977169, HAL.
    16. Ehrenberg, A S C & England, L R, 1990. "Generalising a Pricing Effect," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 47-68, September.
    17. Banelis, Melissa & Riebe, Erica & Rungie, Campbell M., 2013. "Empirical evidence of repertoire size," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 59-65.
    18. David C. Schmittlein & Lee G. Cooper & Donald G. Morrison, 1993. "Truth in Concentration in the Land of (80/20) Laws," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 167-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malekian, Yaser & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2019. "A game theoretic approach to coordinate price promotion and advertising policies with reference price effects in a two-echelon supply chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 114-128.
    2. Pantano, Eleonora & Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele & Dennis, Charles, 2020. "Competing during a pandemic? Retailers’ ups and downs during the COVID-19 outbreak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 209-213.
    3. Pardo-Jaramillo, Sergio & Muñoz-Villamizar, Andrés & Gomez-Gonzalez, Jose E., 2023. "Unveiling the influence of COVID-19 on the online retail market: A comprehensive exploration," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Nielsen, Izabela Ewa & Saha, Subrata, 2018. "Procurement planning in a multi-period supply chain: An epiphany," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 383-398.
    5. Jung-Sup Bae & Weisheng Chiu & Sang-Back Nam, 2021. "Sport Fans’ Price Sensitivity Based on Loyalty Levels: A Case of Korean Professional Baseball League," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Taghikhah, Firouzeh & Voinov, Alexey & Shukla, Nagesh & Filatova, Tatiana, 2021. "Shifts in consumer behavior towards organic products: Theory-driven data analytics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Theiss, Vanessa & Noll, Laura, 2022. "The Effect of Price Changes in Luxury Goods," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 39(1), pages 24-31.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David R. Bell & James M. Lattin, 2000. "Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 185-200, May.
    2. van Oest, Rutger, 2013. "Why are Consumers Less Loss Averse in Internal than External Reference Prices?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 62-71.
    3. Randolph E. Bucklin & Sunil Gupta, 1999. "Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 247-273.
    4. Pak, Tae-Young, 2023. "Relative deprivation and financial risk taking✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    5. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris, 2023. "Masstige marketing: An empirical study of consumer perception and product attributes with moderating role of status, emotion, and pride," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    6. Schmidt, Ulrich & Neyse, Levent & Aleknonyte, Milda, 2019. "Income inequality and risk taking: the impact of social comparison information," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 87(3), pages 283-297.
    7. Necati Tereyağoğlu & Peter S. Fader & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2018. "Multiattribute Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence: Evidence from the Performing Arts Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 421-436, January.
    8. Yasemin Boztug & Lutz Hildebrandt, 2005. "An empirical test of theories of price valuation using a semiparametric approach, reference prices, and accounting for heterogeneity," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2005-057, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    9. Hruschka, Harald & Fettes, Werner & Probst, Markus, 2004. "An empirical comparison of the validity of a neural net based multinomial logit choice model to alternative model specifications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 166-180, November.
    10. Shan, Juan & Jiang, Ling & Cui, Annie Peng, 2021. "A double-edged sword: How the dual characteristics of face motivate and prevent counterfeit luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 59-69.
    11. Ronald Schettkat, 2018. "The Behavioral Economics of John Maynard Keynes," Schumpeter Discussion Papers sdp18007, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    12. Dohmen, Thomas, 2014. "Behavioral labor economics: Advances and future directions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 71-85.
    13. Dawes, John G., 2012. "Brand-Pack Size Cannibalization Arising from Temporary Price Promotions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 343-355.
    14. Ronald Schettkat, 2018. "Revision or Revolution? A Note on Behavioral vs. Neoclassical Economics," Schumpeter Discussion Papers sdp18005, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    15. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 126-137.
    16. Ronald Schettkat, 2020. "Micro-Foundations of Diverging Economic Policies: Keynesian, Behavioural, Neoclassic," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(2), pages 105-111, March.
    17. Neumann, Nico & Böckenholt, Ulf, 2014. "A Meta-analysis of Loss Aversion in Product Choice," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 182-197.
    18. Kumar, Ajay & Paul, Justin, 2018. "Mass prestige value and competition between American versus Asian laptop brands in an emerging market—Theory and evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 969-981.
    19. Venkatesh Shankar & Ruth N. Bolton, 2004. "An Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Retailer Pricing Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 28-49, May.
    20. Tülin Erdem & Michael Katz & Baohong Sun, 2010. "A simple test for distinguishing between internal reference price theories," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 303-332, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:39:y:2017:i:c:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.