IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v66y2017ipap58-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimised scheduling for weather sensitive offshore construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Kerkhove, L.-P.
  • Vanhoucke, M.

Abstract

The significant lead times and costs associated with materials and equipment in combination with intrinsic and weather related variability render the planning of offshore construction projects highly complex. Moreover, the way in which scarce resources are managed has a profound impact on both the cost and the completion date of a project. Hence, schedule quality is of paramount importance to the profitability of the project. A prerequisite to the creation of good schedules is the accuracy of the procedure used to estimate the project outcome when a given schedule is used. Because of the systematic influence of weather conditions, traditional Monte Carlo simulations fail to produce a reliable estimate of the project outcomes. Hence, the first objective of this research is to improve the accuracy of the project simulation by creating a procedure which includes both uncertainty related to the activities and an integrated model of the weather conditions. The weather component has been designed to create realistically correlated wind- and weather conditions for operationally relevant time intervals. The second objective of this research is to optimise the project planning itself by using both general meta-heuristic optimisation approaches and dedicated heuristics which have been specifically designed for the problem at hand. The performance of these heuristics is judged by the expected net present value of the project. The approach presented in this paper is tested on real data from the construction of an offshore wind farm off the Belgian coast and weather data gathered by the Flanders Marine Institute using measuring poles in the North Sea.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerkhove, L.-P. & Vanhoucke, M., 2017. "Optimised scheduling for weather sensitive offshore construction projects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 58-78.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:66:y:2017:i:pa:p:58-78
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.01.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048316000128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2016.01.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    2. Illana Bendavid & Boaz Golany, 2011. "Setting gates for activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem through the cross entropy methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 25-42, September.
    3. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Cheng, T. C. E. & Ding, Q. & Lin, B. M. T., 2004. "A concise survey of scheduling with time-dependent processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Qian, Fubin & Gribkovskaia, Irina & Laporte, Gilbert & Halskau sr., Øyvind, 2012. "Passenger and pilot risk minimization in offshore helicopter transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 584-593.
    6. Ettoumi, F.Youcef & Sauvageot, H & Adane, A.-E.-H, 2003. "Statistical bivariate modelling of wind using first-order Markov chain and Weibull distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1787-1802.
    7. Norlund, Ellen Karoline & Gribkovskaia, Irina & Laporte, Gilbert, 2015. "Supply vessel planning under cost, environment and robustness considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 271-281.
    8. M. H. Rothkopf & J. K. McCarron & S. Fromovitz, 1974. "A Weather Model for Simulating Offshore Construction Alternatives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(10), pages 1345-1349, June.
    9. Shamshad, A. & Bawadi, M.A. & Wan Hussin, W.M.A. & Majid, T.A. & Sanusi, S.A.M., 2005. "First and second order Markov chain models for synthetic generation of wind speed time series," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 693-708.
    10. N.R. Achuthan & A. Hardjawidjaja, 2001. "Project Scheduling under Time Dependent Costs – A Branch and Bound Algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 55-74, November.
    11. Mario Vanhoucke, 2013. "Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-642-40438-2, October.
    12. Sobel, Matthew J. & Szmerekovsky, Joseph G. & Tilson, Vera, 2009. "Scheduling projects with stochastic activity duration to maximize expected net present value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 697-705, November.
    13. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    14. Regnier, Eva, 2008. "Doing something about the weather," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 22-32, February.
    15. Rolf H. Möhring & Andreas S. Schulz & Frederik Stork & Marc Uetz, 2003. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut Computations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 330-350, March.
    16. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2004. "The construction of stable project baseline schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 550-565, August.
    17. Qian, Fubin & Strusevich, Vitaly & Gribkovskaia, Irina & Halskau, Øyvind, 2015. "Minimization of passenger takeoff and landing risk in offshore helicopter transportation: Models, approaches and analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 93-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boda Liu & Bin Yang & Jianzhuang Xiao & Dayu Zhu & Binghan Zhang & Zhichen Wang & Miaosi Dong, 2021. "Review of Optimization Dynamically Applied in the Construction and the Application Potential of ICT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Emad Mohamed & Parinaz Jafari & Adam Chehouri & Simaan AbouRizk, 2021. "Simulation-Based Approach for Lookahead Scheduling of Onshore Wind Projects Subject to Weather Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Albert H. Schrotenboer & Evrim Ursavas & Iris F. A. Vis, 2019. "A Branch-and-Price-and-Cut Algorithm for Resource-Constrained Pickup and Delivery Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1001-1022, July.
    4. Rippel, Daniel & Peng, Shengrui & Lütjen, Michael & Sczcerbicka, Helena & Freitag, Michael, 2020. "Model transformation framework for scheduling offshore logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 521-552, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    5. Rippel, Daniel & Jathe, Nicolas & Lütjen, Michael & Szczerbicka, Helena & Freitag, Michael, 2019. "Integrated domain model for operative offshore installation planning," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, volume 28, pages 25-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Steven J. Schuldt & Mathew R. Nicholson & Yaquarri A. Adams & Justin D. Delorit, 2021. "Weather-Related Construction Delays in a Changing Climate: A Systematic State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Daniel Rippel & Fatemeh Abasian Foroushani & Michael Lütjen & Michael Freitag, 2021. "A Crew Scheduling Model to Incrementally Optimize Workforce Assignments for Offshore Wind Farm Constructions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Hermans, Ben & Leus, Roel & Looy, Bart Van, 2023. "Deciding on scheduling, secrecy, and patenting during the new product development process: The relevance of project planning models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), 2020. "Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability," Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, volume 30, number 30.
    10. Javad Seif & Mohammad Dehghanimohammadabadi & Andrew Junfang Yu, 2020. "Integrated preventive maintenance and flow shop scheduling under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 852-887, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    3. Yangyang Liang & Nanfang Cui & Tian Wang & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Robust resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with stochastic activity duration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 219-254, March.
    4. Bruni, Maria Elena & Hazır, Öncü, 2024. "A risk-averse distributionally robust project scheduling model to address payment delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 398-407.
    5. Illana Bendavid & Boaz Golany, 2009. "Setting gates for activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem through the cross entropy methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 259-276, November.
    6. Etgar, Ran & Gelbard, Roy & Cohen, Yuval, 2017. "Optimizing version release dates of research and development long-term processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 642-653.
    7. Illana Bendavid & Boaz Golany, 2011. "Setting gates for activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem through the cross entropy methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 25-42, September.
    8. Creemers, Stefan, 2018. "Maximizing the expected net present value of a project with phase-type distributed activity durations: An efficient globally optimal solution procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 16-22.
    9. Peymankar, Mahboobeh & Davari, Morteza & Ranjbar, Mohammad, 2021. "Maximizing the expected net present value in a project with uncertain cash flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 442-452.
    10. Illana Bendavid & Boaz Golany, 2011. "Predetermined intervals for start times of activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 429-442, June.
    11. Estévez-Fernández, Arantza, 2012. "A game theoretical approach to sharing penalties and rewards in projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 647-657.
    12. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    13. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    14. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    15. Tang, Jie & Brouste, Alexandre & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2015. "Some improvements of wind speed Markov chain modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 52-56.
    16. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    17. Moukrim, Aziz & Quilliot, Alain & Toussaint, Hélène, 2015. "An effective branch-and-price algorithm for the Preemptive Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem based on minimal Interval Order Enumeration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 360-368.
    18. Mauricio Diéguez & Jaime Bustos & Carlos Cares, 2020. "Mapping the variations for implementing information security controls to their operational research solutions," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 157-186, June.
    19. Fang, Yi-Ping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimum post-disruption restoration under uncertainty for enhancing critical infrastructure resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Amanda S. Hering & Karen Kazor & William Kleiber, 2015. "A Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressive Stochastic Wind Generator for Multiple Spatial and Temporal Scales," Resources, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:66:y:2017:i:pa:p:58-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.