IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v49y2003i3p330-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut Computations

Author

Listed:
  • Rolf H. Möhring

    (Fakultät II, Institut für Mathematik, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. MA 6-1, Stra\beta e des 17. Juni 136, D-10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Andreas S. Schulz

    (Sloan School of Management, E53-361, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Frederik Stork

    (ILOG Deutschland GmbH, Ober-Eschbacher Stra\beta e 109, D-61352 Bad Homburg, Germany)

  • Marc Uetz

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Quantitative Economics, Universiteit Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In project scheduling, a set of precedence-constrained jobs has to be scheduled so as to minimize a given objective. In resource-constrained project scheduling, the jobs additionally compete for scarce resources. Due to its universality, the latter problem has a variety of applications in manufacturing, production planning, project management, and elsewhere. It is one of the most intractable problems in operations research, and has therefore become a popular playground for the latest optimization techniques, including virtually all local search paradigms. We show that a somewhat more classical mathematical programming approach leads to both competitive feasible solutions and strong lower bounds, within reasonable computation times. The basic ingredients of our approach are the Lagrangian relaxation of a time-indexed integer programming formulation and relaxation-based list scheduling, enriched with a useful idea from recent approximation algorithms for machine scheduling problems. The efficiency of the algorithm results from the insight that the relaxed problem can be solved by computing a minimum cut in an appropriately defined directed graph. Our computational study covers different types of resource-constrained project scheduling problems, based on several notoriously hard test sets, including practical problem instances from chemical production planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolf H. Möhring & Andreas S. Schulz & Frederik Stork & Marc Uetz, 2003. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut Computations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 330-350, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:49:y:2003:i:3:p:330-350
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.3.330.12737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.3.330.12737
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.49.3.330.12737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christofides, Nicos & Alvarez-Valdes, R. & Tamarit, J. M., 1987. "Project scheduling with resource constraints: A branch and bound approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 262-273, June.
    2. Ulrich Dorndorf & Erwin Pesch & Toàn Phan-Huy, 2000. "A Time-Oriented Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling with Generalised Precedence Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(10), pages 1365-1384, October.
    3. A. Kimms, 2001. "Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Resource Constraints Using a Lagrangian Relaxation Based Heuristic with Tight Upper Bounds," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 221-236, February.
    4. J. M. W. Rhys, 1970. "A Selection Problem of Shared Fixed Costs and Network Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 200-207, November.
    5. Hugh Everett, 1963. "Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Method for Solving Problems of Optimum Allocation of Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 399-417, June.
    6. Kolisch, Rainer, 1996. "Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 320-333, April.
    7. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    8. Klein, Robert & Scholl, Armin, 1999. "Computing lower bounds by destructive improvement: An application to resource-constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 322-346, January.
    9. Kolisch, Rainer & Schwindt, Christoph & Sprecher, Arno, 1999. "Benchmark instances for project scheduling problems," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 9500, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Kolisch, Rainer & Hartmann, Sönke, 1999. "Heuristic algorithms for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem: classification and computational analysis," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 10966, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. A Drexl & A Kimms, 2001. "Optimization guided lower and upper bounds for the resource investment problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(3), pages 340-351, March.
    12. Klein, Robert, 1999. "Computing lower bounds by destructive improvement - an application to resource-constrained project scheduling," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 10913, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. Leslie A. Hall & Andreas S. Schulz & David B. Shmoys & Joel Wein, 1997. "Scheduling to Minimize Average Completion Time: Off-Line and On-Line Approximation Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 513-544, August.
    14. Brucker, Peter & Knust, Sigrid, 2000. "A linear programming and constraint propagation-based lower bound for the RCPSP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 355-362, December.
    15. Aristide Mingozzi & Vittorio Maniezzo & Salvatore Ricciardelli & Lucio Bianco, 1998. "An Exact Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem Based on a New Mathematical Formulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 714-729, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moehring, Rolf & Uetz, Marc & Stork, Frederik & Schulz, Andreas S., 2002. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut," Working papers 4231-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Andrei Horbach, 2010. "A Boolean satisfiability approach to the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 89-107, December.
    3. Sophie Demassey & Christian Artigues & Philippe Michelon, 2005. "Constraint-Propagation-Based Cutting Planes: An Application to the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 52-65, February.
    4. Alexander Tesch, 2020. "A polyhedral study of event-based models for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 233-251, April.
    5. Fleszar, Krzysztof & Hindi, Khalil S., 2004. "Solving the resource-constrained project scheduling problem by a variable neighbourhood search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 402-413, June.
    6. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    7. Guo, Weikang & Vanhoucke, Mario & Coelho, José, 2023. "A prediction model for ranking branch-and-bound procedures for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 579-595.
    8. Sönke Hartmann, 2002. "A self‐adapting genetic algorithm for project scheduling under resource constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(5), pages 433-448, August.
    9. Hartmann, Sönke, 2011. "Project scheduling with resource capacities and requests varying with time," Working Paper Series 01/2011, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    10. Klein, Robert, 2000. "Bidirectional planning: improving priority rule-based heuristics for scheduling resource-constrained projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 619-638, December.
    11. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    12. Carlier, J. & Neron, E., 2003. "On linear lower bounds for the resource constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 314-324, September.
    13. Brucker, Peter & Knust, Sigrid, 2003. "Lower bounds for resource-constrained project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 302-313, September.
    14. Dieter Debels & Mario Vanhoucke, 2007. "A Decomposition-Based Genetic Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 457-469, June.
    15. Debels, Dieter & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2006. "A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 638-653, March.
    16. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Hartmann, Sönke, 1999. "Self-adapting genetic algorithms with an application to project scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 506, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. Carlier, Jacques & Neron, Emmanuel, 2007. "Computing redundant resources for the resource constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1452-1463, February.
    19. Shadrokh, Shahram & Kianfar, Fereydoon, 2007. "A genetic algorithm for resource investment project scheduling problem, tardiness permitted with penalty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 86-101, August.
    20. Bernardo F. Almeida & Isabel Correia & Francisco Saldanha-da-Gama, 2018. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm for the project scheduling problem with flexible resources," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(2), pages 283-308, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:49:y:2003:i:3:p:330-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.